![]() |
|
|
Vol. 284, Issue 2, 599-605, February 1998
Division of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics,
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The purpose of this study was to determine if lipid transfer protein (LTP I) regulates the plasma lipoprotein distribution of cyclosporine (CSA). Experimental strategies that involved the supplementation and inhibition of LTP I were used to test these hypotheses. Incubation of CSA with human plasma supplemented with exogenous LTP I resulted in a significantly greater percentage of CSA recovered in the high-density lipoprotein (HDL)/lipoprotein deficient plasma (LPDP) fraction than in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL)/very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) fraction compared to plasma which had no exogenous LTP I added. Incubation of radiolabeled cholesteryl ester (CE) or CSA-enriched HDL or LDL in T150 buffer supplemented with LTP I resulted in a significantly greater percentage of CE than CSA being transferred from HDL to LDL and LDL to HDL. However, the percent transfer from LDL to HDL was significantly lower for CE than CSA when these particles were incubated in LPDP that contained endogenous LTP I. The percent transfer of CE from HDL to LDL and LDL to HDL was significantly decreased in the presence of TP2, a monoclonal antibody directed against LTP I, compared to controls. The percent transfer of CSA from LDL to HDL was significantly decreased in the presence of TP2. However, the percent transfer of CSA from HDL to LDL in the presence of TP2 was not significantly different compared to controls. These findings suggest that the transfer of CSA between HDL and LDL is only partially facilitated through LTP I CE transfer activity.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LTP
I, often referred to as cholesteryl ester transfer protein (Tall
et al., 1983
), is a glycoprotein with a molecular weight of
74,000 that has been shown to facilitate the transfer of CE, TG and
phospholipids between different plasma lipoprotein particles (Morton
and Zilversmit, 1982
; Morton and Zilversmit, 1983
; Morton, 1990
).
Although, other investigators have presented evidence for separate TG
and phospholipid transfer proteins (Rajaram et al., 1980
;
Jarnagin et al., 1987
) that lack the capacity to transfer neutral lipids (Tall et al., 1983
; Albers et al.,
1984
), LTP I remains the best characterized and understood of the lipid
transfer proteins in plasma.
Because the human body appears to recognize lipophilic drug compounds
as lipid-like particles (Wasan, 1996
), it has been hypothesized that an
increase in LTP I concentration and activity may facilitate the
movement of lipophilic drugs, such as the antifungal agent AmpB, among
different lipoprotein classes (Wasan et al., 1993
, 1994
). We
have previously demonstrated that AmpB initially associates with HDL
upon incubation in plasma (Wasan et al., 1993
, 1994
). However, when human plasma was supplemented with exogenous LTP I, AmpB
redistributes from HDL to LDL (Wasan et al., 1994
). This observation suggests that changes in LTP I concentration may regulate the distribution of AmpB among the different lipoprotein particles within human plasma. This notion was further supported by the work of
Hughes et al. (1991)
who hypothesized that the plasma lipoprotein distribution of another water insoluble compound, CSA, is
determined by factors other than simple diffusion between the
lipoprotein particles.
CSA is an effective immunosuppressant used in the treatment of a number
of autoimmune diseases as well as in human transplantation (Macoviak
et al., 1985
; Keown, 1990
; Wong et al., 1993
). In
addition, CSA has been shown to bind with lipoproteins upon incubation
in human plasma (Awani and Sawchuk, 1985
; Mraz et al., 1983
;
Sgoutas et al., 1986
). We have further shown that changes in
the total and plasma lipoprotein lipid concentration and composition
influence the lipoprotein binding of CSA (Wasan et al.,
1997
). One of the proposed biological consequences of CSA binding to
lipoproteins is the decrease in the drug's pharmacological effect.
Several investigators have reported decreased pharmacological effects of CSA with hyperlipidemia (particularly in hypertriglyceridemia) (Nemunaitis et al., 1986
; Kippel et al., 1992
),
and increased toxic effects of CSA with hypolipidemia (particularly
hypocholesterolemia) (de Groen et al., 1987
).
Investigations have demonstrated that the cellular uptake of CSA is
mediated through HDL (Hughes et al., 1991
) and LDL receptors (de Groen, 1988
), although recent work has shown that lipoproteins may
not serve as a vehicle for the cellular uptake of CSA into hepatic-derived cells (Rifai et al., 1996
). However, Lemaire
et al. (1988)
have suggested that the drug's availability
to tissue and hence, its pharmacological (or toxic) effects may depend
on which lipoprotein the drug is bound. They have observed enhanced antiproliferative effect of CSA when it was bound to LDL which was not
evident when the drug was bound to either VLDL or HDL (Lemaire et
al., 1988
; Pardridge, 1979
). Furthermore, transplantation patients, many who are administered CSA, exhibit plasma dyslipidemias (i.e., lipid disturbances) including hypocholesterolemia and
hypertriglyceridemia (Gardier et al., 1993
; Arnadottir
et al., 1991
). In addition, these dyslipidemic plasmas have
an elevation in LTP I concentration (Moulin et al., 1992
).
Thus, determining if LTP I facilitates the binding of CSA to certain
lipoproteins may help to explain differences in CSA's pharmacological
behavior after administration to hypocholesterolemic (de Groen et
al., 1987
) and/or hypertriglyceridemic patients (Nemunaitis
et al., 1986
; Kippel et al., 1992
).
The objectives of this study were to determine if LTP I regulates the plasma lipoprotein distribution of CSA and by what mechanisms. We hypothesized that the transfer of CSA between HDL and LDL was a result of direct movement of CSA and/or the cotransport of CSA and CE by LTP I.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chemicals and Plasma
Radiolabeled CSA
([mebmt-
-3H] cyclosporin A;
specific activity, 7.39 mCi/mg) and radiolabeled CE ([1
,2
(n)- 3H] cholesteryl oleate; specific activity,
71.9 mCi/mg) were purchased from Amersham Life Science
(Buckinghamshire, England). Sodium bromide was purchased from Sigma
Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Normolipidemic fasted human plasma was
obtained from the Vancouver Red Cross (Vancouver, British Columbia).
Ten µl of 0.4 M EDTA pH 7.1 (Sigma) was added to 1.0 ml of whole
blood. For all CSA plasma distribution studies,
3H-CSA was dissolved in a 100% ethanol solution.
However, the volume of ethanol used did not modify lipoprotein
composition or LTP I activity (data not shown).
Lipoprotein Separation
Ultracentrifugation.
The plasma was separated into its HDL,
LDL, VLDL, and LPDP fractions by ultracentrifugation (Ramaswamy
et al., 1997
; Havel et al., 1955
). Briefly, human
plasma (3.0 ml) samples were placed in centrifuge tubes and their
solvent densities were adjusted to 1.006 g/ml by sodium bromide. After
centrifugation (L8-80 M; Beckman, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) at 50,000 rpm for 18 hours at 4°C the VLDL-rich and VLDL-deficient plasma
fractions were recovered. The VLDL-deficient plasma fraction was
readjusted to a density of 1.063 g/ml and respun at 50,000 rpm for 18 hours at 4°C to separate the LDL-rich and VLDL/LDL-deficient plasma fractions. This fraction was readjusted to a density of 1.21 g/ml and
respun at 50,000 rpm for 18 h at 4°C to separate the HDL-rich and LPDP fractions.
Affinity chromatography and ultracentrifugation.
Lipoproteins were separated into the HDL/LPDP and LDL/VLDL fractions by
the LDL-Direct cholesterol chromatographic column (Wasan et
al., 1993
). This chromatographic column is a heparin-manganese polyacrylamide matrix, which separates lipoproteins based on their apolipoprotein content. Any plasma components that contain
apolipoproteins B or E are retained by the column while all other
components are eluted. Once the gel matrix was fully hydrated with 1 ml
of a preparatory solution (0.02% sodium chloride + 0.002%
chloramphenicol), plasma samples (200 µl) were placed onto the column
followed by an HDL eluting agent (1 ml containing 0.02% sodium
chloride + 0.002% chloramphenicol). The flow through fraction, which
contains HDL (1.2 ml), was collected. The LDL/VLDL eluting agent
(containing 2.9% sodium chloride + 0.002% chloramphenicol) was next
placed onto the column and the LDL/VLDL fraction (2.4 ml) was
collected. Subsequently, LDL is separated from VLDL and HDL is
separated from LPDP by density gradient ultracentrifugation.
Isolation and Purification of LTP I
LTP I was purified from human lipoprotein-deficient plasma as
has been previously described (Morton and Zilversmit, 1982
). Briefly,
citrated human plasma was made lipoprotein-deficient by the
dextran-MnCl2 procedure of Burstein et
al. (1970)
. LTP I was then partially purified by sequential
chromatography on phenyl-Sepharose and carboxy-methylcellulose gel
(CMC-52, Whatman Inc., Chifton, NJ). Purified LTP I (2.0 mg
protein/ml), enriched 800-fold relative to lipoprotein-deficient
plasma, was stored at 4°C in 0.01% disodium EDTA pH 7.4. The CMC
fraction of LTP I was used in all experiments. Lipid transfer protein
I-free CMC solution does not elicit any lipid or drug transfer activity
(data not shown).
Radiolabeling of Plasma Lipoproteins
Human HDL and LDL were labeled by the lipid dispersion technique
as previously described (Morton and Zilversmit, 1982
, 1983
). Briefly,
human plasma was incubated with a lipid dispersion containing egg PC
and 3H-CE (13.9 ng/ml) or
3H-CSA (1000 ng/ml) at 37°C for 20 to 24 hr in
the presence of LTP I. Then the HDL and LDL fractions were isolated
from the total lipoprotein precipitate by centrifugation as previously
described and further purified by dialyzing against PBS solution (4 liters) for 18 hr at 4°C. The molecular weight cut-off of the
dialysis tubing used was 1000. After dialysis these lipoprotein
fractions were filtered through a 0.2-µ filter. The dialysis and
filtration steps were performed to remove any radiolabeled CE or CSA,
which has not been incorporated into the core of HDL and LDL.
HDL labeled with 3H-CE had a specific activity of
1.9 × 10
3 µCi/10 µg HDL
cholesterol while HDL labeled with 3H-CSA had a
specific activity of 3.5 × 10
2
µCi/10 µg HDL cholesterol. Low-density lipoproteins labeled with 3H-CE had a specific activity of 1.6 × 10
3 µCi/µg LDL cholesterol while LDL
labeled with 3H-CSA had a specific activity of
1.6 × 10
2 µCi/10 µg LDL
cholesterol.
Lipid and Drug Transfer Assays
Lipid (CE) and drug (CSA) transfers were performed within the
T150 buffer and lipoprotein-deficient plasma as has been previously described (Wasan et al., 1994
; Morton and Zilversmit, 1982
;
Pattnaik and Zilversmit, 1979
). Typically, 10 µg (total cholesterol)
of radiolabeled donor and unlabeled acceptor are incubated ± LTP I (1.0 µg protein/ml; concentration was determined from a dose response curve in fig. 2A) in T150 buffer or delapidated human plasma
(delipidated human plasma was used as a LTP I source with a
concentration of 1.0 µg protein/ml as determined by ELISA), pH 7.4 for 60 min (time was determined from a time response curve in fig. 2B)
at 37°C. Lipid and drug transfer between donor and acceptor
lipoprotein is then quantitated by scintillation counting. The fraction
of lipid and drug transferred (kt) is calculated as described by
Pattnaik and Zilversmit (1979)
:
|
Quantification of CSA and Plasma Lipids
HDL, LDL, VLDL and LPDP fractions were analyzed for 3H-CSA against external standard calibration curves (corrected for quenching and luminescence) using radioactivity. Enzymatic assay kits from Sigma Diagnostics (St. Louis, MO) determined total and lipoprotein triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations.
Calculation of CE Molar Transfer Rates
To determine the molar transfer rates of CE between HDL and LDL
a molecular weight of 654 was used for radiolabeled CE. It was assumed
that 70% of total cholesterol within each lipoprotein fraction was
esterified (CE) (Grundy, 1990
). In addition, it was assumed that
radiolabeled CE transferred in the same manner as cold CE. The absolute
amount of radiolabeled lipid transferred was determined and the
transfer rate in pmoles per hour was calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
Experimental Design
To provide evidence that LTP I may facilitate the movement of CSA between lipoprotein fractions the lipoprotein distribution of CSA (1000 ng/ml) within human plasma which has been supplemented with exogenous LTP I was determined (fig. 1). In addition, to establish that HDL and LDL have the ability to sequester CSA and CE within their hydrophobic lipid core, radiolabeled CSA and CE were incubated in human plasma and the amount of radiolabeled CSA and CE incorporated into HDL and LDL were determined (table 1).
|
|
To investigate the hypotheses that the direct movement of CSA and/or the cotransport of CSA and CE is facilitated by LTP I, the experimental conditions by which the LTP I studies will be investigated under were established (table 2; fig. 2). Furthermore, two strategies that involved the supplementation and inhibition of LTP I were used to test the aforementioned hypotheses.
|
|
The first strategy was to incubate CSA-enriched HDL or LDL in 50 mM
Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.02% sodium azide, 0.01% disodium ETDA (T150
buffer), pH 7.4 which contain a drug-free lipoprotein counterpart in
the presence or absence of LTP I (1.0 µg protein/ml). Endogenous LTP
I concentration within normolipidemic human plasma is usually 1 to 2 ug
protein/ml (Morton and Zilversmit, 1982
,1983
). In a further experiment
LTP I was coincubated with TP2 (4 µg protein/ml) a monoclonal
antibody directed against LTP I (Hesler et al., 1988
) (figs.
3 and 4).
These experiments were designed to further confirm if the movement of
CSA between lipoprotein particles was partially facilitated by LTP I
and/or a result of nonfacilitated drug transfer rather than the
influence of other plasma components (e.g., TG and
phospholipid transfer proteins).
|
|
A second strategy was to incorporate CSA into HDL and LDL, reisolate these CSA enriched lipoprotein fractions and then incubate these lipoprotein particles in lipoprotein-deficient human plasma in the presence of a drug-free lipoprotein counterpart (e.g., 3H-CSA-HDL and CSA- free LDL) (figs. 3 and 4). The human plasma, which served as the source of LTP I in this experiment, contained a LTP I concentration of 1.0 µg protein/ml as determined by ELISA (data not shown). To confirm that the transfer of CSA is due to LTP I and not other endogenous plasma factors, TP2 (4 µg protein/ml; as determined by ELISA) (data not shown) was coincubated with CSA-enriched and -free lipoprotein particles in plasma (figs. 3 and 4). To assure that the antibody significantly inhibits LTP I activity, CE transfer between HDL and LDL in the presence and absence of TP2 was determined (table 2). These experiments were designed to directly measure the potential role of LTP I in mediating drug transfer vs. the ability of the drug molecules to spontaneously transfer among lipoprotein classes within human plasma.
For all the aforementioned experiments incubations were carried out for 60 min at 37°C. After each incubation the plasma and T150 buffer sample were separated into their individual lipoprotein constituents either by affinity chromatography only, affinity chromatography followed by density gradient ultracentrifugation or density gradient ultracentrifugation and assayed for CSA by radioactivity.
Statistical Analysis
Differences in drug distribution within plasma lipoproteins and differences in LTP I mediated CE and CSA transfer activity in the presence of different treatment groups were determined by a two-way analysis of variance (PCANOVA; Human Systems Dynamics, La Jolla, CA). Critical differences were assessed by Neuman-Keuls post hoc tests. Differences were considered significant if P < .05. All data are expressed as mean ± S.D.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Influence of LTP I on the plasma distribution of CSA.
To
assess the influence of LTP I on the lipoprotein distribution of CSA
within human plasma, radiolabeled CSA (1000 ng/ml) was incubated in
human plasma for 60 min at 37°C which had been supplemented with
exogenous LTP I (0, .5, 1, 2 µg protein/ml). A significantly greater
percentage of CSA was recovered in the HDL/LPDP fraction and a
significantly lower percentage of CSA was recovered in the LDL/VLDL
fraction in plasma supplemented with LTP I compared to plasma that was
not supplemented with exogenous LTP I (fig. 1). The endogenous LTP I
concentration for all human plasma used in these studies was 1.0 µg
protein/ml as determined by ELISA (data not shown). Because most
pharmacokinetic data reported by other investigators have shown that
CSA serum concentrations resulting from the daily administration of CSA
seldom exceeds 1000 ng/ml, this concentration was chosen for all
incubation experiments (Brunner et al., 1990
; Sgoutas
et al., 1986
; Awni et al., 1989
). CSA
concentrations of 250 and 500 ng/ml were also tested with similar
results (data not shown).
CE and CSA transfer between HDL and LDL. To determine the ability of LTP I to promote the transfer of CE and CSA from HDL to LDL, radiolabeled CE- or CSA-enriched HDL and radiolabeled CE- or CSA-free LDL particles were incubated in T150 buffer (which contained 1.0 ug protein/ml of exogenous LTP I) or in LPDP (which contained 1.0 µg protein/ml of endogenous LTP I) for 60 min at 37°C. The percent transfer of CE from HDL to LDL was significantly greater than the percent transfer of CSA in both T150 buffer and human plasma (fig. 3). Furthermore, the percent transfer of CE and CSA was greater in human plasma than in T150 buffer (fig. 3). When the percent transfer of CE and CSA were determined in the presence of TP2 (4 µg protein/ml), the percent transfer of CE was significantly decreased in T150 buffer and human plasma compared to controls (fig. 3). However, the percent transfer of CSA was not significantly different in T150 buffer and human plasma compared to controls (fig. 3).
To determine the ability of LTP I to promote the transfer of CE and CSA from LDL to HDL, radiolabeled CE- or CSA-enriched LDL and radiolabeled CE- or CSA-free HDL particles were incubated in T150 buffer (which contained 1.0 µg protein/ml of exogenous LTP I) or in LPDP (which contained 1.0 µg protein/ml of endogenous LTP I) for 60 min at 37°C. The percent transfer of CE from LDL to HDL was greater than CSA in T150 buffer (fig. 4). However, the percent transfer of CSA was significantly greater than CE in human plasma (fig. 4). Furthermore, the percent transfer of CE and CSA were significantly greater in human plasma than in T150 buffer (fig. 4). When the percent transfer of CE and CSA were determined in the presence of TP2, the percent transfer of CE and CSA were significantly decreased in T150 buffer and human plasma compared to controls (fig. 4).| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The objective of this study was to determine the influence of LTP
I on the plasma lipoprotein distribution of CSA. Our data suggests that
LTP I appear to have a direct role in the distribution of CSA among
plasma lipoproteins. This is similar to our observations with AmpB
(Wasan et al., 1994
; Wasan and Lopez-Berestein, 1995
). However, unlike AmpB, the transfer of CSA between HDL and LDL appears
to be only partially dependent on LTP I-facilitated transfer of CE.
We have previously demonstrated that the distribution of AmpB among HDL
and LDL after incubation in human plasma is facilitated by LTP I. However, once AmpB was incorporated into liposomes composed of
negatively charged and neutral phospholipids, the ability of LTP I to
transfer AmpB and 3H-CE from HDL to LDL
diminished (Wasan et al., 1994
; Wasan and Lopez-Berestein,
1995
). We concluded from these studies that because AmpB interacts with
free cholesterol and CE upon incubation in plasma (Wasan et
al., 1993
; Bolard et al., 1980
), LTP I's ability to
transfer AmpB between HDL and LDL was due to its ability to transfer CE
between HDL and LDL and not due to the direct transfer of AmpB between
lipoprotein fractions. In the case of CSA increases in LTP I
concentration resulted in an increased percentage of CSA recovered in
the HDL/LPDP fraction during short-term incubations (fig. 1). As LTP I
is the protein which catalyzes the transfer exchange of CE from CE-rich
lipoproteins (HDL and LDL) for TG from TG-rich lipoproteins (VLDL),
these findings suggest that CSA plasma distribution may be related to
its lipoprotein-lipid content.
In experiments that were designed to directly measure the potential role of LTP I to facilitate CSA transfer, LTP I-mediated percent transfer of CE among HDL and LDL particles were significantly different than that of CSA (figs. 3 and 4). The differences in the percent transfer of CE vs. CSA may be attributed to an ability of LTP I to transfer lipid and drug separately. Furthermore, differences could be attributed to the ability of HDL and LDL particles to accumulate a higher amount of CE than CSA (e.g., HDL sequesters approximately 1460 ng CE/ng CSA; LDL sequesters approximately 3564 ng CE/ng CSA). Our findings further suggest that HDL particles are much more effective at binding CSA than LDL particles (table 1).
Sgoutas et al. (1986)
have proposed that the nature of
CSA's association with HDL and LDL particles appears to be nonspecific and of low affinity and high capacity suggesting that CSA is physically dissolved within the lipoprotein-lipid component. Furthermore, because
CSA appears to be only partially recognized by LTP I as an endogenous
lipid compound, LTP I's ability to transfer CSA between HDL and LDL is
only part of the story. This is supported by evidence that demonstrates
the percent transfer of CSA from LDL to HDL is significantly greater in
human plasma than in T150 buffer (fig. 4) regardless of whether LTP I
activity was decreased or not. These findings suggest two
possibilities, 1) the spontaneous transfer of CSA and/or 2) the
facilitated transfer of CSA by other endogenous plasma factors
(e.g., TG and phospholipid transfer proteins). However, the
percent transfer of CSA from HDL to LDL, although significantly greater
in human plasma than in T150 buffer (fig. 3), does not decrease when a
significant reduction in LTP I-mediated CE transfer was observed. These
findings further support the notion that the transfer of CSA from HDL
to LDL is not LTP I-mediated and may be due to spontaneous and/or
facilitated transfer by other endogenous plasma factors. In addition,
these results suggest that LTP I may only be partially responsible for
the greater capacity of HDL than LDL to accept CSA. Different
physical-chemical characteristics of HDLs including lipid composition
and overall particle charge may possibly explain CSA's preference to
bind with HDL. Studies that investigate these characteristics are
currently being completed in our laboratory.
When the molar transfer rates of CE were calculated a number of additional conclusions could be made. The CE molar transfer rate between HDL and LDL was not significantly different in human plasma vs. T150 buffer (fig. 5). However, the percent transfer of CSA from HDL to LDL and LDL to HDL was five to nine times greater respectively in human plasma than T150 buffer (figs. 3 and 4). These observations provide further evidence that CSA transfer is independent of CE transfer and is mediated by plasma factors other than LTP I. Furthermore, when LTP I-mediated transfer of CE between HDL and LDL was inhibited by TP2, only the transfer of CSA from LDL to HDL was significantly decreased. These results suggest that the transfer of CSA from LDL to HDL is only partially facilitated by LTP I, however, the transfer of CSA from HDL to LDL is not facilitated by LTP I but by other plasma factors and/or spontaneous transfer (fig. 6).
|
|
In conclusion we have determined that the distribution of CSA among lipoproteins is partially influenced by LTP I. Because many bone marrow transplantation patients exhibit lipid disturbances, including hypocholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia, these results may provide an explanation for the unpredictable and inconsistent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of CSA after administration. Future studies will investigate the pharmacological implications of CSA's predominant association with plasma lipoproteins
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication October 28, 1997.
Received for publication May 16, 1997.
1 This work was supported with grants from the University of British Columbia Development Fund and the Medical Research Council of Canada (Grant MA-14484).
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Kishor M. Wasan, Assistant Professor of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia 2146 East Mall Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
LTP I, lipid transfer protein I; CE, cholesteryl ester; TG, triglyceride; AmpB, amphotericin B; HDL, high-density lipoproteins; LDL, low density lipoproteins; VLDL, very low density lipoproteins; CSA, cyclosporine; T 150 buffer, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.02% sodium azide, 0.01% disodium EDTA, pH 7.4; TP2, monoclonal antibody directed against lipid transfer protein I; LPDP, lipoprotein-deficient plasma; EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; CMC, carboxy-methylcellulose; PC, egg phosphatidylcholine; k, constant; fraction of label transferred, t, time.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0022-3565/98/2842-0599$03.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. M. Wasan, O. Sivak, R. A. Cote, A. I. MacInnes, K. D. Boulanger, M. Lynn, W. J. Christ, L. D. Hawkins, and D. P. Rossignol Association of the Endotoxin Antagonist E5564 with High-Density Lipoproteins In Vitro: Dependence on Low-Density and Triglyceride-Rich Lipoprotein Concentrations Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2003; 47(9): 2796 - 2803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||