![]() |
|
|
Vol. 284, Issue 1, 323-336, 1998
Department of Histochemistry (J.W., K.M., R.A.D.R., J.M.P.), Imperial College School of Medicine, The Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 ONN, UK; Vascular Biology Centre (J.D.C.), Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia; Heart Science Centre (A.C., M.H.Y.), Harefield Hospital, Harefield, Middlesex UB9 6JH, UK; and Cardiothoracic Unit (B.F.W., M.R.DeL.), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London WC1 3JH, UK
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cardiac expression of angiotensin II (Ang II) AT1 and
AT2 receptor subtypes is species dependent, and changes in
their relative proportion may influence myocardial hypertrophy and
fibrosis. Regional differences in the distribution of Ang II receptors
in the normal and failing human heart were assessed using
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding and
quantitative autoradiography. Receptor subtypes were distinguished by
their affinity for selective nonpeptide antagonists (losartan and
PD123319) and sensitivity to dithiothreitol. Ventricular and atrial
tissues displayed a heterogeneous distribution of ligand binding sites.
AT2 receptors predominated, representing 70% to 77% of
the sites in normal and noninfarcted myocardium. Endocardial,
interstitial, perivascular and infarcted regions in the ventricles of
patients with end-stage ischemic heart disease or dilated
cardiomyopathy exhibited a significantly greater density (P < .001) of high affinity AT2 binding sites
(Kd = 0.57 nmol/liter) compared
with adjacent noninfarcted myocardium. Regions displaying the relative
increase in AT2 binding sites corresponded to areas of
fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition, shown by picrosirius
red staining. AT1 binding sites were localized to nerves,
occurred at relatively low density in coronary vessels and represented
only 23% to 29% of myocardial
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding
sites. The border zone between infarcted and noninfarcted myocardium
characteristically contained numerous microvessels, exhibiting
perivascular AT2 receptors and endothelial angiotensin converting enzyme activity, as demonstrated by binding of
125I-351A. Specific myocardial AT2 receptor
mRNA transcripts (
3 kb) were identified and exhibited alternative
splicing of untranslated 5
exons. The differential distribution of
cardiac Ang II receptor subtypes and selective increase in binding to
AT2 sites in the diseased heart suggest that cells bearing
the AT2 receptor represent a significant target for Ang II,
possibly contributing to its growth-related actions.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Increasing
evidence indicates that the renin-angiotensin system is important in
the physiology and pathology of the heart and that Ang II acts as a
growth factor, influencing myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis
(Blaufarb and Sonnenblick, 1996
; Pfeffer et al., 1995
; Weber
et al., 1993
; Weber and Brilla, 1991
). Expression of
angiotensinogen, renin, ACE and Ang II receptors has been demonstrated in human cardiac tissues (Morgan et al., 1994
; Paul et
al., 1993
; Schütz et al., 1996
) and changes in
the expression of these genes associated with cardiac hypertrophy,
myocardial infarction and impaired cardiac function (Blaufarb and
Sonnenblick, 1996
; Pfeffer et al., 1995
; Weber et
al., 1993
; Weber and Brilla, 1991
). At the cellular level, Ang II
induces expression of both immediate-early genes and late markers of
cardiac hypertrophy in neonatal rat myocytes (Sadoshima and Izumo,
1993
) and stimulates mitogenesis, collagen synthesis and expression of
transcription factors in cultured rat cardiac fibroblasts (Crabos
et al., 1994
; Sadoshima and Izumo, 1993
; Schorb et
al., 1993
; Villarreal et al., 1993
). Although
relatively little is known about the growth-related actions of Ang II
in the human heart, it has been reported to influence collagen (Brilla
et al., 1995
) and DNA synthesis in isolated human cardiac
fibroblasts (Neu
et al., 1994
, 1996
). The importance of
the renin angiotensin system in humans has also been underlined by the
effectiveness of ACE inhibitors in the treatment of patients with
various forms of heart disease (Blaufarb and Sonnenblick, 1996
; Pfeffer
et al., 1995
; Weber et al., 1993
; Weber and
Brilla, 1991
).
The actions of Ang II are mediated by specific membrane bound
receptors, of which two main subtypes have been identified, AT1 and AT2 receptors, by
their pharmacological and molecular characteristics (Timmermans
et al., 1993
). Although both receptors have a similar
affinity for Ang II and the peptide antagonist (Sar1,Ile8)Ang II, they may
be distinguished by their distinct affinity for receptor selective
peptide analogs and nonpeptide compounds. AT1
receptors display a high affinity for nonpeptide antagonists such as
losartan (Chiu et al., 1990
; Whitebread et al.,
1989
) and eprosartan (Weinstock et al., 1991
), whereas
AT2 receptors have high affinity for the
nonpeptide antagonist PD 123319 (Dudley et al., 1990
), and
peptide analogs such as CGP 42112A (Whitebread et al., 1991
)
and [p-amino-Phe6]Ang II (Speth and
Kim, 1990
). The two receptors may also be identified on the basis of
their sensitivity to the disulfide reducing agent DTT, binding to
AT1 receptors being inhibited by DTT, whereas that to AT2 receptors is unaffected or enhanced
in the presence of DTT (Chiu et al., 1989
; Whitebread
et al., 1989
). Agonist binding to the two receptors also
exhibits a differential sensitivity to guanine nucleotides (Dudley
et al., 1990
). Using these criteria, AT1 and AT2 receptors have
been identified on isolated rat cardiac myocytes (Meggs et
al., 1993
; Reiss et al., 1993
) and fibroblasts (Crabos
et al., 1994
; Sadoshima and Izumo, 1993
; Schorb et
al., 1993
; Villarreal et al., 1993
) and in the
myocardium of several mammals (Rogg et al., 1990
; Chang and
Lotti, 1991
; Nozawa et al., 1994
), including humans (Nozawa
et al., 1994
; Regitz-Zagrosek et al., 1995
; Rogg
et al., 1996
). The nucleotide sequences and genomic
organization of the human AT2 (Martin and Elton,
1995
; Martin et al., 1994
) and AT1
receptor (Bergsma et al., 1992
; Guo et al., 1994
;
Konishi et al., 1994
) genes have been determined, and the
expression of both receptors has been demonstrated in human heart. At
the receptor level, however, there are significant species differences
in the distribution of Ang II receptor subtypes, with most studies
indicating that AT1 sites represent the majority of cardiac receptors in experimental animals (Nozawa et al.,
1994
), whereas the AT2 subtype predominates in
membrane preparations of the human heart (Nozawa et al.,
1994
; Regitz-Zagrosek et al., 1995
; Rogg et al.,
1996
).
Expression of the AT2 receptor subtype in the
cardiovascular system changes during development (Hunt et
al., 1995
; Matsubara et al., 1994
; Sechi et
al., 1992
; Shanmugam et al., 1996
) is growth dependent
and modulated by vasoactive factors such as Ang II (Kijima et
al., 1996
). Cardiac expression of the AT2
receptor is also increased, together with the AT1
receptor, in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (Suzuki et
al., 1993
) and after myocardial infarction (Nio et al.,
1995
). Furthermore, a switch from AT1 to
AT2 receptor subtype expression has been
demonstrated in the hypertrophic rat heart after pressure and volume
overload (Lopez et al., 1994
; Poole et al., 194)
and in a canine model of right ventricular hypertrophy (Lee et
al., 1996
). Although the functional significance of the cardiac
AT2 receptor has yet to be established, it has been shown to mediate a number of Ang II-induced responses in the
cardiovascular system. These include modulation of collagen metabolism
in isolated rat cardiac fibroblasts (Brilla et al., 1994
),
stimulation of arachidonic acid release from rat cardiac myocytes
(Lokuta et al., 1994
) and inhibition of cell proliferation and growth by antagonizing the growth-promoting effects of the AT1 receptor (Booz and Baker, 1996
; Levy et
al., 1996
; Nakajima et al., 1995
; Stoll et
al., 1995
).
The proportion of Ang II receptors in human atrial tissues is
influenced by cardiac function, with the number of
AT2 binding sites increasing and
AT1 sites declining with the degree of impairment of cardiac function (Rogg et al., 1996
). Establishing the
localization of these receptors, in ventricular as well as atrial
tissues, and determining disease-related differences in receptor
distribution represent important steps toward further understanding the
cellular targets for Ang II and the pathophysiological significance of Ang II receptor subtypes in the human heart. Two studies to date have
attempted to localize these receptors in human cardiac tissues but were
either unable to distinguish receptor subtypes due to the lack of
selective ligands (Urata et al., 1989
) or because only the
presence of receptors in the right atrial appendage was examined (Brink
et al., 1996
). Furthermore, although ACE expression is
reported to be increased in the failing human heart (Studer et
al., 1994
; Zisman et al., 1995
) the cellular
distribution of ACE expression was not determined and has not been
compared with that of Ang II receptors in human cardiac tissues.
The purpose of this study was therefore to determine the localization and binding characteristics of Ang II receptors in the explanted failing and normal human heart, using selective peptide analogs and nonpeptide antagonists to distinguish AT1 and AT2 receptor subtypes, and to compare by autoradiography the distribution of specific Ang II and ACE binding sites.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II and 125I-CGP 42112A
[125I-(N-
-nicotinoyl-Tyr-(N-
-CBZ-Arg)Lys-His-Pro-Ile-OH);
specific activity, 2200 Ci/mmol] were purchased from DuPont-New
England Nuclear (Stevenage, UK). 125I-Ang IV
(specific activity, 2000 Ci/mmol) was obtained from Amersham International (Amersham, UK). Losartan [DuP 753:
2-n-butyl-4-chloro-5-(hydroxymethyl)-l-[(2
(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)-methyl]imidazole] was obtained from DuPont Merck (Wilmington, DE). Eprosartan
(SKF-108566: E-
-2-[2-butyl-1-[(carboxyphenyl)methyl]1H-imidazol-5-yl)methylene]-2-thiophenepropanoic acid)was from SmithKline Beecham (Collegeville, PA). PD123319 [1(4-amino-3-methylphenyl)methyl-5-diphenylacetyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid-2HCl] was from Parke-Davis (Ann Arbor, MI). Unlabeled CGP 42112A
and [p-amino-Phe6]Ang II were
purchased from Neosytem Laboratorie (Strasbourg, France). Unlabeled
(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II, Ang II,
Ang IV (Ang II 3-8 fragment) and other chemicals were purchased from
Sigma Chemical (Poole, UK). Primary antisera (JC/70A, A082) were
obtained from DAKO (High Wycombe, UK). Biotinylated horse anti-mouse
IgG and goat anti-rabbit IgG and avidin-biotin complex were from Vector
Laboratories (Peterborough, UK).
Patients and tissues.
Heart tissues were obtained from
patients undergoing cardiac transplantation and donor tissues not
suitable for transplantation (table 1)
and comprised transmural samples from the lateral walls of the
ventricles and the interventricular septum. Atrial tissues were also
obtained in a proportion of cases. Tissue samples were either
snap-frozen, for mRNA extraction, or mounted on cork mats, embedded in
mounting medium (Tissue Tek; Miles, Elkhart, IN) and frozen in melting
dichlorodifluoromethane (Arcton-12; I.C.I., Runcorn, Cheshire, UK) or
isopentane, for autoradiography and staining. Frozen tissues were
stored either in liquid nitrogen or at
40°C.
|
In vitro autoradiographic analysis of Ang II binding
sites.
Cryostat sections (10 µm thick) were cut, and
thaw-mounted onto chrome-alum-gelatin-coated microscope slides and
stored at
20°C. Sections were preincubated in 10 mmol/liter sodium
phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 150 mmol/liter NaCl, 10 mmol/liter MgCl2 and 28 µmol/liter bacitracin for 10 min
at 20° to 22°C, followed by incubation in buffer containing 250 pmol/liter
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II and 1% bovine serum albumin, for 5 to 180 min at 20° to 22°C,
as previously described in studies on other human tissues (Knock
et al., 1994
; Walsh et al., 1994
). Sections were
washed in ice-cold buffer twice for 5 min at 4°C, quickly rinsed in
ice-cold distilled water and dried under a stream of cold air.
Nonspecific binding was determined by coincubating adjacent sections
with 10
6 mol/liter unlabeled
(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II; the
proportion of AT1 and AT2
binding sites was assessed by coincubating adjacent sections with
10
5 mol/liter
AT1-selective (losartan) and
AT2-selective (PD123319) antagonists. Association
time course experiments were undertaken at 20° to 22°C, and ligand
stability was assessed by reapplying the incubation medium to fresh
adjacent sections, under identical conditions. Ang II binding sites
were further characterized by incubating consecutive sections with 250 pmol/liter
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II in the presence of increasing concentrations
(10
10 to 10
5 mol/liter)
of unlabeled (Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II, Ang II, losartan, eprosartan, PD123319, CGP 42112A or [p-amino-Phe6]Ang II. Saturation
studies were performed by incubating consecutive sections with
increasing concentrations (50-2000 pmol/liter) of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II for 150 min at 20° to 22°C. The sensitivity of ligand binding to
the sulfhydryl reducing agent DTT was investigated by incubating
sections in the absence and presence of 10 mmol/liter DTT. The
distribution of
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II binding sites was also compared with that of 250 pmol/liter 125I-CGP 42112A and
125I-Ang IV.
2) were obtained for each film.
Calculations and statistical analysis.
The equilibrium
dissociation constant (Kd) and
maximum binding capacity (Bmax) were
derived from saturation experiments. The concentrations of unlabeled
ligands producing 50% inhibition of binding
(IC50) of 250 pmol/liter
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II were calculated for each case from binding inhibition experiments.
Inhibition constant (Ki) values were
derived from IC50 values according to the
equation of Cheng and Prusoff (1973)
: Ki = IC50/(1 + [L]/Kd), where [L] is the ligand
concentration and Kd is the
equilibrium dissociation constant derived from saturation experiments.
Data from inhibition experiments were fitted to one- and two-site
models, and the "best fit" was compared by F tests. Curve fitting and experimental derivation of binding constants were
performed by iterative nonlinear regression using GraphPAD Inplot
version 4 (GraphPAD Software, San Diego, CA). Binding data are
expressed as arithmetic or geometric means as appropriate, with 95% CI
or S.E.M. values. Comparisons between groups were made by Student's
t test (two-tailed) or one-way analysis of variance followed
by Bonferroni's correction, as appropriate. Values of P < .05 were taken as significant.
In vitro autoradiographic localization of ACE.
Autoradiographic techniques were also used to localize ACE in unfixed
cryostat sections of human heart, using a
125I-labeled tyrosyl-derivative of lisinopril,
125I-351A
(N-[(s)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-L-lysyl-tyrosyl-L-proline), essentially as described previously (Allen et al., 1988
).
125I-351A (specific activity, 2000 Ci/mmol) was
iodinated, as described previously (Fyhrquist et al., 1984
),
and high-performance liquid chromatography purification was performed
with a Waters C18 µBondapak analytical column using a mobile phase
consisting of 88% 0.04 mol/liter phosphoric acid with triethylamine,
pH 3 (A), and 12% acetonitrile (B) for 10 min, followed by a linear
gradient from 12% to 25% B over the next 40 min. The retention time
for the monoiodinated product was 24 min. The stability of
125I-351A has been determined previously (Jackson
et al., 1986
). Sections were processed as described above
for Ang II receptor autoradiography and incubated in phosphate buffer
containing 0.3 nmol/liter 125I-351A for 60 min at
20° to 22°C, and labeled sections were exposed to
Hyperfilm-3H for 3 to 7 days. Nonspecific binding
was defined as that remaining in the presence of either 1 mmol/liter
EDTA or 10
5 mol/liter lisinopril.
Microautoradiography.
Further anatomic resolution of
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II and 125I-351A binding sites was achieved by
microautoradiography. In comparison with other peptide binding sites,
ligand binding to angiotensin II receptors is more readily dissociated
when labeled sections are immersed directly in emulsion. Dry-apposition
techniques were therefore used (Hudson, 1993
), with labeled sections
being apposed to emulsion (Ilford K5; Ilford, Cheshire, UK) -coated
coverslips for 2 to 3 weeks at 4°C. After exposure,
microautoradiographs were developed in Kodak D-19 developer for 3 min
at 20°C and fixed, and the sections were stained with hematoxylin and
eosin and mounted in dibutylpthalate polystyrene xylene (DPX; BDH
Laboratory Supplies, Poole, UK).
Picrosirius red staining.
Collagen deposition was
demonstrated by picrosirius red staining, essentially as described
(Dobler and Spach, 1987
) and validated (Pickering and Boughner, 1990
)
previously. This is a collagen-specific stain that enhances the natural
birefringence of collagen fibers when viewed with polarized light.
Briefly, sections were immersed in 0.2% (w/v) aqueous phosphomolybdic
acid for up to 5 min, stained for 60 to 90 min in a 0.1% solution of
sirius red F3B (BDH Laboratory Supplies) in saturated picric acid,
rinsed in 0.01 M HCl, dehydrated, mounted in DBX and examined with an
Olympus BX-60 microscope using polarized light.
Immunohistochemistry.
To examine further the localization of
specific ligand binding, consecutive sections to those used for
autoradiography were processed for immunostaining using primary
antisera raised to endothelial cell marker PECAM CD31 (clone JC/70A)
(Parums et al., 1990
). Cryostat sections were fixed in 10%
formal saline for 10 min, rinsed and incubated with antiserum (diluted
1:1000) overnight at 4°C. Immunoreactivity was visualized by the
avidin-biotin method of Hsu et al. (1981)
, with glucose
oxidase/nickel enhancement (Shu et al., 1988
). Controls
included omission of the primary antiserum and replacement with
nonimmune serum.
Angiotensin AT2 receptor expression.
Detection of AT2 receptor expression in human
cardiac tissues was confirmed by RT-PCR and Northern blot analysis.
Total RNA was extracted from tissue samples using the single-step acid
guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method (Chomczynski and
Sacchi, 1987
). Yield (
300 µg/g wet weight of tissue) and purity
were assessed spectrophotometrically (optical density, 260 and 280 nm).
Then, 5-µg amounts of total RNA were reverse transcribed into cDNA
with random primers using a cDNA Cycle kit (InVitrogen, San Diego, CA).
Oligonucleotide primers were synthesized (R&D Systems Europe, Abingdon,
UK) according to the nucleotide sequences and genomic organization of
the human AT2 receptor (Martin and Elton, 1995
).
AT2 primer sequences were
5
-CGTCCCAGCGTCTGAGAG-3
, which starts at position 74 in exon 1 (sense), and 5
-TCACAGGTCCAAAGAGCCA-3
, which starts at position 1941 in exon 3 (antisense). Aliquots of cDNA (50 ng) were amplified using
gene-specific pairs of primers in 50-µl reactions containing 1×
NH4 buffer, 0.5 mmol/liter
MgCl2, 0.1 µmol/liter concentration of each
primer, 0.5 mmol/liter concentration of dNTPs, 1 µCi of
[
-32P]dCTP and 2.5 units BioTaq
DNA polymerase (Bioline, London, UK). After 5-min denaturation at
95°C, hot-start reactions were run into plateau phase (up to 50 cycles, denaturation at 93°C for 30 sec; annealing 60°C for 30 sec;
extension at 72°C for 30 sec) and finally incubated at 72°C for 10 min, using a PHC-3 thermocycler (Techne, Cambridge, UK). Appropriate
negative controls included omission of the RT step and inclusion of
water blanks. PCR products were analyzed by nondenaturing 6%
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. Individual
amplification products were excised from the gel, and the identity of
each band was confirmed by direct cycle sequencing using a Circumvent
kit (New England Biolabs, Letchworth, Hertfordshire, UK).
-GCGGTCTTCACTTCGGGC-3
(sense) and 5
-ATCACAGGTCCAAAGAGCCA-3
(antisense) primers.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Localization and characterization of angiotensin binding
sites.
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II binding sites were demonstrated in sections of microscopically
normal atrium and ventricle obtained from patients with cystic
fibrosis, congenital heart defects, craniocerebral trauma or ruptured
aorta (table 1, patients 1-8). Specific binding sites were localized
to the myocardium, throughout both atria and ventricles; the medial
layer in coronary arteries and to nerves running with coronary vessels
in the epicardium and myocardium (fig.
1).
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II binding to all these structures was totally inhibited in the
presence of an excess (10
6 mol/liter) of
unlabeled (Sar1,Ile8)Ang II
or Ang II and was differentially inhibited by AT1
and AT2 antagonists (figs. 1,
2, and 3).
The relative density of myocardial binding sites was 2- to 3-fold
greater (P < .001) in the atria (9.6 amol·mm
2; 95% CI, 6.6-12.6;
n = 7) compared with the ventricles (3.9 amol·mm
2; 95% CI, 2.9-4.9;
n = 9) and comprised both AT1 and
AT2 subtypes. AT2 sites
predominated, representing 77% (95% CI, 70-80) and 71% (95% CI,
58-84) of the total binding in the atrial and ventricular myocardium,
respectively (fig. 2). The density of
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II binding to the wall of coronary arteries (4.1 amol·mm
2; 95% CI, 2.4-5.8;
n = 6) was similar to that observed in ventricular myocardium, but AT1 sites represented 85% (95%
CI, 76-94) of all the binding sites identified (figs. 2 and 3). The
density of binding sites localized to nerves (30.2 amol·mm
2; 95% CI, 19.6-40.8;
n = 10) was 3- to 7-fold greater than that measured in
the myocardium and coronary arteries, and AT1
sites comprised 96% (95% CI, 94-98) of the total binding (figs. 2
and 3). The same relative proportion of AT1 and
AT2 sites was demonstrated in all the regions
examined after inhibition of
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II binding by either losartan or PD123319 (fig. 3). No binding was
detected that lacked affinity for either AT1 or
AT2 antagonists, and no specific
125I-Ang IV binding sites were observed. A
similar distribution and density of binding sites were observed in
cardiac tissues obtained from patients undergoing retransplantation due
to acute or chronic allograft failure (table 1, patients 9-14), and no
association was found between the distribution of specific
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II binding sites and inflammatory cell infiltration. It was not
possible to distinguish between binding to myocardial and interstitial
cells due to the homogeneous distribution of
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II binding sites in normal myocardium and the limited resolution of the
autoradiographic technique.
|
|
|
2; 95%
CI, 8.8-12.8; n = 11) compared with that found in
adjacent noninfarcted myocardium (4.2 amol·mm
2; 95% CI, 2.8-5.6;
n = 10). Equilibrium binding density in noninfarcted myocardium was indistinguishable (P = .64) from that detected in
microscopically normal heart tissues. The focal increase in 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II binding in failing explanted hearts was specifically inhibited in
the presence of either 10
6 mol/liter unlabeled
(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II or Ang II
and by 10
5 mol/liter of the
AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319 (figs. 4 and 5). The addition of the
AT1 receptor-selective antagonist losartan (10
5 mol/liter) had no apparent affect, and the
presence of 10 mmol/liter DTT significantly increased (P < .001)
the density of binding (figs. 4 and 5). Incubation of adjacent sections
of ventricle with
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II and the AT2 receptor-selective ligand
125I-CGP 42112A resulted in identical
autoradiographic images, indicating the similar distribution of the
binding sites (fig. 4). No specific 125I-Ang IV
binding sites were demonstrated in human ventricular myocardium,
although binding was observed in sections of bovine heart processed at
the same time (data not shown).
|
|
2 (95% CI, 37.6-68.1), and
nonspecific binding represented <10% of the total binding (fig. 6).
Binding was specifically inhibited by coincubation with either
unlabeled (Sar1,Ile8)Ang II
or Ang II and by the AT2 receptor-selective
compounds CGP 42112A,
[p-amino-Phe6]Ang II and PD123319
but not by losartan and eprosartan (fig. 7). Nonlinear regression analysis of this
data was best fitted to a one-site model and demonstrated significant
differences in the potency of the inhibitors, with a rank order of CGP
4211 > (Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II > Ang II > [p-amino-Phe6]Ang II > PD123319, characteristic of binding to AT2 sites
(table 2). The cellular localization and
equilibrium constants of ligand binding sites in noninfarcted
myocardium could not be reliably determined due to the limited
resolution of the autoradiographic technique and the comparatively low
density of binding. The relative proportion of
AT1 and AT2 binding sites
detected in noninfarcted ventricular myocardium was, however, similar
to that demonstrated in the normal heart, with
AT2 sites representing 76% (95% CI, 66-86) and
AT1 sites representing 23% (95% CI, 13-33) of
the total.
|
|
|
|
Comparative distribution of AT2 and ACE
binding sites.
125I-351A bound specifically
to the coronary vascular endothelium in arteries, arterioles and
microvessels and was completely inhibited in the presence of either 1 mmol/liter EDTA or 10
5 mol/liter lisinopril.
125I-351A binding was observed in both
noninfarcted myocardium and infarcted areas, with the latter
corresponding to the regions exhibiting a high density of
AT2 binding sites (fig.
9). A differential distribution of
vascular ACE and AT2 binding sites was
demonstrated using microautoradiography, with
125I-351A and
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II binding being mainly localized to the endothelial and adventitial
layers of the vessel wall, respectively (fig. 9). In contrast to the
high density of silver grains overlying the vascular endothelium,
relatively few specific 125I-351A binding sites
were detected either on the endocardium or the other regions that
displayed
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II binding characteristic of AT2 sites (fig. 9).
The distribution of 125I-351A binding
corresponded with that of CD31-immunoreactive endothelium in small
arteries, arterioles and microvessels, and the border zone between
infarcted areas and noninfarcted myocardium characteristically contained numerous microvessels, exhibiting
125I-351A binding to the vessel wall and
perivascular AT2 binding sites (fig.
10).
|
|
AT2 receptor expression.
Specific
products corresponding to human AT2 receptor cDNA
sequences were generated by RT-PCR from both atrial and ventricular tissue samples and the expression of the gene displayed alternative splicing of 5
untranslated exons (fig.
11). Two AT2
receptor transcripts were found, with the identity of each being
confirmed by direct cycle sequencing. A 507-bp fragment encoding exons
1, 2 and 3 predominated, and a 448-bp fragment encoding exons 1 and 3 was also detected. Expression of the AT2 receptor
gene was confirmed by Northern blot analysis of mRNA isolated from
ventricle tissues of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy or ischemic
heart disease, with a single
3-kb band being demonstrated (fig. 11).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present data indicate that the human heart contains two populations of 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites, displaying characteristics of AT1 and AT2 receptors, and the relative density and proportion of these two binding sites varies according to the specific structures that bear them. We have shown that 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang II binding sites are differentially distributed in the human heart and that the AT2 subtype predominates in the myocardium of both the normal and failing heart, representing 70% to 77% of the specific binding sites identified. This subtype occurred throughout the myocardium and was relatively more numerous in the atria than the ventricles. A selective increase in AT2 binding sites was observed in the ventricular myocardium of explanted failing hearts from patients with ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy and localized to endocardial, interstitial, perivascular and infarcted regions, corresponding to sites of collagen deposition and fibroblast proliferation. In contrast, a homogeneous population of AT1 binding sites was localized to nerves and, albeit at relatively low density, in coronary vessels, as well as in the myocardium.
The two
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II binding sites were distinguished on the basis of differences in
their respective affinity for the AT1 and
AT2 nonpeptide antagonists losartan and PD123319
and their sensitivity to DTT. Specific high affinity
AT2 sites displayed a similar distribution
pattern to binding sites for the AT2
receptor-selective ligand 125I- CGP 42112A and
were further characterized by competitive inhibition experiments. The
rank order of inhibitory potency of peptide analogs and nonpeptide
antagonists for
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II binding sites in the failing human heart (CGP 42112A > (Sar1,Ile8)Ang II > Ang II > [p-amino-Phe6]Ang
II > PD123319 
losartan = eprosartan)
corresponded to that exhibited by the AT2
receptor in other mammalian tissues (Iimmermans, et al.,
1993) and by the cloned human AT2 receptor
expressed in vitro (Martin et al., 1994
; Tsuzuki
et al., 1994
). The identification of cardiac
125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II binding sites as either AT1 or
AT2 receptors was verified by demonstrating well
established differences in the sensitivity of the two receptors to DTT
(Chui et al., 1989; Nozawa et al., 1994
;
Whitbread et al., 1989), with ligand binding to
AT1 sites being inhibited by DTT, whereas binding
to AT2 sites was increased. Finally, expression
of the AT2 receptor gene in human cardiac tissues
was confirmed at the molecular level by the demonstration of a specific
3-kb AT2 mRNA transcript in both atrial and
ventricular tissues, corresponding in size to that demonstrated in
other human tissues (Koike et al., 1994
).
The proportion of AT2 binding sites determined
autoradiographically in both normal and noninfarcted myocardium in
failing explanted hearts corresponds with that found in radioligand
binding studies using atrial and ventricular myocardial membrane
preparations from normal individuals and patients with impaired cardiac
function or end-stage heart failure due to ischemic heart disease or
dilated cardiomyopathy (Nozawa et al., 1994
; Regitz-Zagrosek
et al., 1995
; Rogg et al., 1996
). Rogg et
al. (1996)
also demonstrated that the proportion of
AT1 and AT2 receptors in
the right atrial myocardium, from patients with normal or moderately
impaired cardiac function, correlates with atrial pressure and left
ventricular ejection fraction, but the tissue distribution of the
receptor subtypes was not determined. Our data, together with the
recent observations of Brink et al. (1996)
on atrial
appendage tissues, indicate that changes in the proportion of cardiac
Ang II receptor subtypes are associated with disease-related
differences in cardiac structure, with a selective increase in
AT2 receptor binding occurring in regions of
fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition in the hearts of
patients with ischemic heart disease, idiopathic dilated
cardiomyopathy, mitral valve disease and adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy. These observations are in contrast to those obtained in
experimental models of heart disease, for example, after myocardial infarction in the rat, where we (Lefroy et al., 1996
) and
others (Sun and Weber, 1994
) have demonstrated a marked increase in
specific AT1 binding sites in regions of fibrosis
and collagen deposition. The present observations therefore serve to
further emphasize the fact that there are species differences in both
the regulation and proportion of cardiac AT1 and
AT2 receptors.
Although the functional significance of the human cardiac
AT2 receptor has yet to be established, the
receptor has been shown to mediate distinct Ang II-induced effects in a
variety of cell types, influencing, for example, collagen metabolism in
cultured rat cardiac fibroblasts (Brilla et al., 1994
).
Several studies have also demonstrated an antigrowth role for the
AT2 receptor in the cardiovascular system,
inhibiting the proliferation of rat coronary endothelial cells (Stoll
et al., 1995
) and transfected vascular smooth muscle cells
(Nakajima et al., 1995
), inhibiting arterial hypertrophy and
fibrosis in Ang II-induced hypertensive rats (Levy et al.,
1996
) and opposing Ang II-induced growth of cultured neonatal rat
myocytes (Booz and Baker, 1996
). The cellular expression of the
AT2 receptor is growth dependent (Kijima et al., 1996
; Yamada et al., 1996
), and apoptosis
represents one mechanism by which it may induce an antigrowth effect
(Yamada et al., 1996
). Indeed, apoptotic myocytes have been
found to occur relatively frequently in the border zone of infarcted
human heart tissues (Saraste et al., 1997
), and it has been
speculated that the AT2 receptor may influence
changes in myocardial structure by mediating apoptosis (Dzau and
Horiuchi, 1996
). Our observations indicate that the tissue-selective
distribution pattern of AT2 receptor expression
in the failing human heart is common to a number of cardiac diseases in
which there is myocardial infarction and fibrosis, suggesting that it
is not a primary event specific to a particular disease but rather that
it represents part of a general mechanism contributing to
disease-related changes in myocardial structure.
The distribution of 125I-351A binding sites
corresponds with immunohistochemical localization of ACE
immunoreactivity to the vascular endothelium in the human heart
(Danilov et al., 1987
; Falkenhahn et al., 1995
;
Hokimoto et al., 1996
). Increased ACE activity has been
reported to occur in human ventricular myocardium after myocardial
infarction (Hokimoto et al., 1995
, 1996
) and increased ACE
mRNA levels detected in the failing explanted hearts of patients with
ischemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy (Studer et
al., 1994
; Zisman et al., 1995
). The distribution of 125I-351A binding demonstrated in the present
study, together with the immunohistochemical observations of Falkenhahn
et al. (1995)
, indicate that the vascular endothelium is
also the main site of cardiac ACE expression in the failing human
heart, with 125I-351A binding and ACE
immunoreactivity being prominent in the vessels that proliferate in the
border zone between infarcted and noninfarcted myocardium. Although
cardiac myocytes and interstitial cells in the failing heart displayed
relatively little 125I-351A binding, the extent
to which nonendothelial cells may exhibit ACE activity requires further
investigation, particularly as recent immunohistochemical studies have
provided conflicting information concerning the localization of ACE
immunoreactivity after myocardial infarction (Falkenham et
al., 1995; Hokimoto et al., 1996
) and its distribution
has not been determined by immunohistochemistry in cardiac tissues from
patients with dilated cardiomyopathy or other forms of heart disease.
Clinical trials have provided unequivocal evidence that ACE inhibitor
therapy has a beneficial effect on patients with heart failure due to
ischemic or nonischemic forms of heart disease, notably dilated
cardiomyopathy, relieving symptoms and prolonging survival (Blaufarb
and Sonnenblick, 1996
; Pfeffer et al., 1995
). ACE
inhibitor therapy also appears to have a beneficial effect on patients
with epirubicin-induced cardiomyopathy (Jensen et al.,
1996
); however, the mechanisms underlying the beneficial actions of ACE
inhibitors remain incompletely understood. The inhibition of ACE is not
specific for Ang II production because it influences the metabolism of
other peptides, notably bradykinin, which may contribute to its
vasodilator and growth-inhibiting properties (Blaufarb and Sonnenblick,
1996
; Pfeffer et al., 1995
). In addition, an alternative
ACE-independent pathway for the generation of Ang II, by chymase,
exists in the human heart (Urata et al., 1990
), with
chymase-like immunoreactivity being localized to interstitial cells, as
well as endothelial and mast cells, in the ventricular myocardium of
the failing human heart (Urata et al., 1993
). Nevertheless, recent studies have indicated that ACE rather than chymase is the
predominant pathway responsible for the local generation of Ang II in
the human (Studer et al., 1994
; Zisman et al.,
1995
). Regardless of the pathways involved in the generation of Ang II in the heart, Ang II receptor subtypes represent a direct means of
influencing Ang II-induced changes in the growth and structure of the
myocardium and thereby its contribution to the progression of heart
failure. Experimentally, the AT1 receptor appears
to mediate many of the known growth-related changes induced by Ang II
in isolated rat cardiac fibroblasts and myocytes (Crabos et al., 1994
; Sadoshima and Izumo, 1993
; Schorb et al.,
1993
; Villarreal et al., 1993
), and treatment of animals
with an AT1 receptor antagonist attenuates most
of the growth-related changes identified in the hypertrophic heart,
including a reduction in cardiac size, DNA proliferation in
interstitial cells and collagen deposition (Kojima et al.,
1994
; Makino et al., 1996
; Nakamura et al., 1994
;
Schiefer et al., 1994
; Smits et al., 1992
; Suzuki
et al., 1993
). Clinically, AT1
receptor antagonists have also been shown to block the pressor response
to Ang II, reduce elevated blood pressure and exert beneficial hemodynamic effects in heart failure (Awan and Mason, 1996
; Goodfriend et al., 1996
; Johnston, 1995
). However, it remains to be
seen whether AT1 receptor antagonists will
influence human ventricular hypertrophy, reproducing the results
obtained in experimental animals, and display the same reduction in
mortality and morbidity associated with ACE inhibitors. Furthermore,
AT1 receptor blockade increases Ang II levels in
humans and might therefore indirectly induce AT2
receptor mediated responses (Awan and Mason, 1996
; Goodfriend et
al., 1996
; Johnston, 1995
).
Study limitations.
Due to limited resolution of the
autoradiographic technique and the homogeneous distribution of
relatively low density myocardial 125I-(Sar1,Ile8)Ang
II binding sites, the cellular resolution of AT1
and AT2 sites in normal and noninfarcted human
myocardium remains unclear. Ultrastructural examination of ligand
binding sites and immunohistochemical studies, using antibodies
selective for AT1 or AT2
receptors, represent possible alternative strategies for the cellular
resolution of Ang II receptor subtypes in human myocardium in
situ. Several studies have used isolated rat myocytes and cardiac
fibroblasts to investigate the cellular localization of Ang II receptor
subtypes (Crabos et al., 1994
; Sadoshima and Izumo, 1993
;
Schorb et al., 1993
; Villarreal et al., 1993
),
but the relevance of their findings to humans is uncertain in view of
species differences in the cardiac expression of Ang II receptors. In
addition, cultured cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts exhibit
differential expression and regulation of Ang II receptor genes
(Matsubara et al., 1994
), and results obtained using
isolated cardiac cells may be confounded by the apparent plasticity of
AT2 receptor gene expression. The proportion of
cardiac AT1 and AT2
receptors expressed in situ in the rat heart has, for
example, been found to vary from that detected in cultured cells
(Feolde et al., 1994
), possibly reflecting down-regulation of AT2 receptor expression after the isolation of
mammalian cells (Johnson and Aguilera, 1991
; Villarreal et
al., 1993
) and the growth-dependent regulation of
AT2 receptor expression in cultured cells (Kijima
et al., 1996
; Yamada et al., 1996
). Similarly,
the results of ligand binding studies on human heart tissues appear to
differ from those obtained with isolated cardiac cells. Although AT2 binding sites predominate in both tissue
sections and myocardial membrane preparations of the human heart,
cultured human cardiac fibroblasts are reported to display
AT1 rather than AT2
receptor-mediated effects on collagen synthesis (Brilla et
al., 1995
). Atypical Ang II binding sites have also been detected,
albeit transiently, on cultured human cardiac fibroblasts, which
internalize Ang1-7 and Ang II, but not Ang3-8, and influence DNA
synthesis (Neu
et al., 1994
, 1996
). Further atypical Ang
II binding sites, displaying high affinity for Ang3-8 (Ang IV) and low
affinity for losartan and PD123319, have been identified on rabbit
cardiac fibroblasts (Wang et al., 1995) and myocardial
membranes of guinea pig and rabbit heart (Hanesworth et al.,
1993
), but they have not been described in the human heart in
situ, and in the present study no specific
125I-Ang IV binding sites were detected in the
cardiac tissues examined.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We are indebted to Dr. R. D. Smith (DuPont Merck, Wilmington, DE) for supplying losartan (DuP 753); Dr. J. B. Reese (SmithKline Beecham, Collegeville, PA) for supplying eprosartan (SKF-108566), Dr. J. A. Keiser (Parke-Davis, Ann Arbor, MI) for supplying PD 123319; and Dr. M. Hitchens (Merck Sharp and Dohme Laboratories, West Point, PA) for supplying 351A.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication September 5, 1997.
Received for publication March 13, 1997.
1 This work was supported by a grant from the British Heart Foundation (PG/95017).
Send reprint requests to: Dr. John Wharton, Department of Histochemistry, Imperial College School of Medicine, The Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 ONN, UK. E-mail: jwharton{at}rpms.ac.uk
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; Ang II, angiotensin II; Ang IV, hexapeptide fragment 3-8 of angiotensin II; DTT, dithiothreitol; PECAM, platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule; CI, confidence interval; RT, reverse transcription; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
M,
Regitz-Zagrosek V,
Hildebrandt A and
Fleck E
(1994) Human cardiac fibroblasts express an angiotensin receptor with unusual binding characteristics which is coupled to cellular proliferation.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
204: 1334-1339[Medline].
M,
Regitz-Zagrosek V,
Hildebrandt A and
Fleck E
(1996) Isolation and characterisation of human cardiac fibroblasts from explanted adult hearts.
Cell Tissue Res
286: 145-153[Medline].
-adrenergic receptor blockade.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
203: 1865-1874[Medline].
M,
Rolfs A,
Steffen C,
Hildebrandt A,
Hetzer R and
Fleck E
(1995) Regulation chamber localization and subtype distribution of angiotensin II receptors in human hearts.
Circulation
91: 1461-1471This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Messadi-Laribi, V. Griol-Charhbili, A. Pizard, M.-P. Vincent, D. Heudes, P. Meneton, F. Alhenc-Gelas, and C. Richer Tissue Kallikrein Is Involved in the Cardioprotective Effect of AT1-Receptor Blockade in Acute Myocardial Ischemia J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2007; 323(1): 210 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Philipp, C. Broschk, A. Vollmar, and O. Distl Evaluation of Tafazzin as Candidate for Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Irish Wolfhounds J. Hered., July 9, 2007; (2007) esm045v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Stacy, Q. Yu, K. Horak, and D. F Larson Effect of angiotensin II on primary cardiac fibroblast matrix metalloproteinase activities Perfusion, January 1, 2007; 22(1): 51 - 55. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Warnecke, P. Mugrauer, D. Surder, J. Erdmann, C. Schubert, and V. Regitz-Zagrosek Intronic ANG II type 2 receptor gene polymorphism 1675 G/A modulates receptor protein expression but not mRNA splicing Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): R1729 - R1735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D'Amore, M. J. Black, and W. G. Thomas The Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Causes Constitutive Growth of Cardiomyocytes and Does Not Antagonize Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor-Mediated Hypertrophy Hypertension, December 1, 2005; 46(6): 1347 - 1354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S Anavekar and S. D Solomon Angiotensin II receptor blockade and ventricular remodelling Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2005; 6(1): 43 - 48. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L Ripley Valsartan in Chronic Heart Failure Ann. Pharmacother., March 1, 2005; 39(3): 460 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Watanabe, T. A. Barker, and B. C. Berk Angiotensin II and the Endothelium: Diverse Signals and Effects Hypertension, February 1, 2005; 45(2): 163 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nakayama, X. Yan, R. L. Price, T. K. Borg, K. Ito, A. Sanbe, J. Robbins, and B. H. Lorell Chronic ventricular myocyte-specific overexpression of angiotensin II type 2 receptor results in intrinsic myocyte contractile dysfunction Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): H317 - H327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Johren, A. Dendorfer, and P. Dominiak Cardiovascular and renal function of angiotensin II type-2 receptors Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2004; 62(3): 460 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. Batenburg, I. M. Garrelds, C. C. Bernasconi, L. Juillerat-Jeanneret, J. P. van Kats, P. R. Saxena, and A.H. J. Danser Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor-Mediated Vasodilation in Human Coronary Microarteries Circulation, May 18, 2004; 109(19): 2296 - 2301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yousufuddin, D. J. Cook, R. C. Starling, A. Abdo, P. Paul, E. M. Tuzcu, N. B. Ratliff, P. M. McCarthy, J. B. Young, and M. H. Yamani Angiotensin II receptors from peritransplantation through first-year post-transplantation and the risk of transplant coronary artery disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 5, 2004; 43(9): 1565 - 1573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yousufuddin, S. Haji, R. C. Starling, E. M. Tuzcu, N. B. Ratliff, D. J. Cook, A. Abdo, Y. Saad, S. S. Karnik, D. Wang, et al. Cardiac angiotensin II receptors as predictors of transplant coronary artery disease following heart transplantation Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2004; 25(5): 377 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Lako-Futo, I. Szokodi, B. Sarman, G. Foldes, H. Tokola, M. Ilves, H. Leskinen, O. Vuolteenaho, R. Skoumal, R. deChatel, et al. Evidence for a Functional Role of Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor in the Cardiac Hypertrophic Process In Vivo in the Rat Heart Circulation, November 11, 2003; 108(19): 2414 - 2422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Yan, R. L. Price, M. Nakayama, K. Ito, A. J. T. Schuldt, W. J. Manning, A. Sanbe, T. K. Borg, J. Robbins, and B. H. Lorell Ventricular-specific expression of angiotensin II type 2 receptors causes dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure in transgenic mice Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2003; 285(5): H2179 - H2187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Carey and H. M. Siragy Newly Recognized Components of the Renin-Angiotensin System: Potential Roles in Cardiovascular and Renal Regulation Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2003; 24(3): 261 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Pantev, E. Stenman, A. Wackenfors, L. Edvinsson, and M. Malmsjo Comparison of the antagonistic effects of different angiotensin II receptor blockers in human coronary arteries Eur J Heart Fail, December 1, 2002; 4(6): 699 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-M. Herrmann, V. Nicaud, K. Schmidt-Petersen, J. Pfeifer, J. Erdmann, T. McDonagh, H. J. Dargie, M. Paul, and V. Regitz-Zagrosek Angiotensin II type 2 receptor gene polymorphism and cardiovascular phenotypes: the GLAECO and GLAOLD studies Eur J Heart Fail, December 1, 2002; 4(6): 707 - 712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Solomon and M. A. Pfeffer Renin-Angiotensin System and Cardiac Rupture After Myocardial Infarction Circulation, October 22, 2002; 106(17): 2167 - 2169. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Berry, R. Touyz, A. F. Dominiczak, R. C. Webb, and D. G. Johns Angiotensin receptors: signaling, vascular pathophysiology, and interactions with ceramide Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2001; 281(6): H2337 - H2365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Schuijt, M. Basdew, R. van Veghel, R. de Vries, P. R. Saxena, R. G. Schoemaker, and A. H. Jan Danser AT2 receptor-mediated vasodilation in the heart: effect of myocardial infarction Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2001; 281(6): H2590 - H2596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Deinum, J. M.G. van Gool, M. J.M. Kofflard, F. J. ten Cate, and A.H. J. Danser Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptors and Cardiac Hypertrophy in Women With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Hypertension, December 1, 2001; 38(6): 1278 - 1281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lee, C. M. Kramer, S. Mankad, S.-e. Yoo, and K. Sandberg Combined angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin AT1 receptor blockade up-regulates myocardial AT2 receptors in remodeled myocardium post-infarction Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2001; 51(1): 131 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Schmieder, J. Erdmann, C. Delles, J. Jacobi, E. Fleck, K. Hilgers, and V. Regitz-Zagrosek Effect of the angiotensin II type 2-receptor gene (+1675 G/A) on left ventricular structure in humans J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 175 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Akishita, M. Iwai, L. Wu, L. Zhang, Y. Ouchi, V. J. Dzau, and M. Horiuchi Inhibitory Effect of Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor on Coronary Arterial Remodeling After Aortic Banding in Mice Circulation, October 3, 2000; 102(14): 1684 - 1689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. de Gasparo, K. J. Catt, T. Inagami, J. W. Wright, and Th. Unger International Union of Pharmacology. XXIII. The Angiotensin II Receptors Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2000; 52(3): 415 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Valen, G. Paulsson, A. M. Bennet, G. K. Hansson, and J. Vaage Gene expression of inflammatory mediators in different chambers of the human heart Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2000; 70(2): 562 - 567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Maruyama, E. Hatta, K. Yasuda, N. C. E. Smith, and R. Levi Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-Independent Angiotensin Formation in a Human Model of Myocardial Ischemia: Modulation of Norepinephrine Release by Angiotensin Type 1 and Angiotensin Type 2 Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2000; 294(1): 248 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Yi Xu, V. Menon, and B. I Jugdutt Cardioprotection after angiotensin II type 1 blockade involves angiotensin II type 2 receptor expression and activation of protein kinase C-{varepsilon} in acutely reperfused myocardial infarction in the dog: Effect of UP269-6 and losartan on AT1- and AT2-receptor expression and IP3 receptor and PKC{varepsilon} proteins Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2000; 1(2): 184 - 195. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. MARSHALL, R. J. MCANULTY, and G. J. LAURENT Angiotensin II Is Mitogenic for Human Lung Fibroblasts via Activation of the Type 1 Receptor Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2000; 161(6): 1999 - 2004. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. De Mello and A. H. J. Danser Angiotensin II and the Heart : On the Intracrine Renin-Angiotensin System Hypertension, June 1, 2000; 35(6): 1183 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kupfahl, D. Pink, K. Friedrich, H. R. Zurbrugg, M. Neuss, C. Warnecke, J. Fielitz, K. Graf, E. Fleck, and V. Regitz-Zagrosek Angiotensin II directly increases transforming growth factor {beta}1 and osteopontin and indirectly affects collagen mRNA expression in the human heart Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2000; 46(3): 463 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Matsumoto, R. Ozono, T. Oshima, H. Matsuura, T. Sueda, G. Kajiyama, and M. Kambe Type 2 angiotensin II receptor is downregulated in cardiomyocytes of patients with heart failure Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2000; 46(1): 73 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gallinat, S. Busche, M. K. Raizada, and C. Sumners The angiotensin II type 2 receptor: an enigma with multiple variations Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, March 1, 2000; 278(3): E357 - E374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ozono, T. Matsumoto, T. Shingu, T. Oshima, Y. Teranishi, M. Kambe, H. Matsuura, G. Kajiyama, Z.-Q. Wang, A. F. Moore, et al. Expression and localization of angiotensin subtype receptor proteins in the hypertensive rat heart Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2000; 278(3): R781 - R789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Horiuchi, W. Hayashida, M. Akishita, S. Yamada, J. Y. A. Lehtonen, K. Tamura, L. Daviet, Y. E. Chen, M. Hamai, T.-X. Cui, et al. Interferon-{gamma} Induces AT2 Receptor Expression in Fibroblasts by Jak/STAT Pathway and Interferon Regulatory Factor-1 Circ. Res., February 4, 2000; 86(2): 233 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Walsh, J. Catravas, and J. Wharton Angiotensin converting enzyme in human synovium: increased stromal [125I]351A binding in rheumatoid arthritis Ann Rheum Dis, February 1, 2000; 59(2): 125 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. I. Jugdutt, Yi Xu, M. Balghith, R. Moudgil, and V. Menon Cardioprotection Induced by AT1R Blockade After Reperfused Myocardial Infarction: Association With Regional Increase in AT2R, IP3R and PKC{varepsilon} Proteins and cGMP Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 2000; 5(4): 301 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P.M Cleutjens, W.M. Blankesteijn, M. J.A.P Daemen, and J. F.M Smits The infarcted myocardium: Simply dead tissue, or a lively target for therapeutic interventions Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 1999; 44(2): 232 - 241. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. W. Morrell, P. D. Upton, S. Kotecha, A. Huntley, M. H. Yacoub, J. M. Polak, and J. Wharton Angiotensin II activates MAPK and stimulates growth of human pulmonary artery smooth muscle via AT1 receptors Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, September 1, 1999; 277(3): L440 - L448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Brunner-La Rocca, G. Vaddadi, and M. D. Esler Recent insight into therapy of congestive heart failure: focus on ACE inhibition and angiotensin-II antagonism J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 1999; 33(5): 1163 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Horiuchi, M. Akishita, and V. J. Dzau Recent Progress in Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Research in the Cardiovascular System Hypertension, February 1, 1999; 33(2): 613 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. O. Lim, M. Nys, A. A. O. Naas, A. D. Struthers, M. Osbakken, and T. M. MacDonald Irbesartan Reduces QT Dispersion in Hypertensive Individuals Hypertension, February 1, 1999; 33(2): 713 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hafizi, J. Wharton, K. Morgan, S. P. Allen, A. H. Chester, J. D. Catravas, J. M. Polak, and M. H. Yacoub Expression of Functional Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme and AT1 Receptors in Cultured Human Cardiac Fibroblasts Circulation, December 8, 1998; 98(23): 2553 - 2559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jalowy, R. Schulz, H. Dorge, M. Behrends, and G. Heusch Infarct size reduction by AT1-receptor blockade through a signal cascade of AT2-receptor activation, bradykinin and prostaglandins in pigs J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 1998; 32(6): 1787 - 1796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chassagne, C. Adamy, P. Ratajczak, B. Gingras, E. Teiger, E. Planus, P. Oliviero, L. Rappaport, J.-L. Samuel, and S. Meloche Angiotensin II AT2 receptor inhibits smooth muscle cell migration via fibronectin cell production and binding Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2002; 282(4): C654 - C664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||