![]() |
|
|
Vol. 283, Issue 3, 979-992, 1997
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (W.R.K., V.M.M., R.L.P.), College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida and Anesthesia Research Unit (C.J.L.), Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We assessed the pharmacological activity of anabaseine, a toxin found in certain animal venoms, relative to nicotine and anabasine on a variety of vertebrate nicotinic receptors, using cultured cells, the Xenopus oocyte expression system, contractility assays with skeletal and smooth muscle strips containing nicotinic receptors and in vivo rat prostration assay involving direct injection into the lateral ventricle of the brain. Anabaseine stimulated every subtype of nicotinic receptor that was tested. It was the most potent frog skeletal muscle nicotinic receptor agonist. At higher concentrations it also blocked the BC3H1 (adult mouse) muscle type receptor ion channel. The affinities of the three nicotinoid compounds for rat brain membrane alpha-bungarotoxin binding sites and their potencies for stimulating Xenopus oocyte homomeric alpha7 receptors, expressed in terms of their active monocation concentrations, displayed the same rank order, anabaseine>anabasine> nicotine. Although the maximum currents generated by anabaseine and anabasine at alpha7 receptors were equivalent to that of acetylcholine, the maximum response to nicotine was only about 65% of the acetylcholine response. At alpha4-beta2 receptors the affinities and apparent efficacies of anabaseine and anabasine were much less than that of nicotine. Anabaseine, nicotine and anabasine were nearly equipotent on sympathetic (PC12) receptors, although parasympathetic (myenteric plexus) receptors were much more sensitive to anabaseine and nicotine but less sensitive to anabasine. These differences suggest that there may be different subunit combinations in these two autonomic nicotinic receptors. The preferential interactions of anabaseine, anabasine and nicotine with different receptor subtypes provides molecular clues that should be helpful in the design of selective nicotinic agonists.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Neuronal
nicotinic receptors have attracted much interest during the past few
years, largely due to the discovery that the Alzheimer's brain loses
many of its nicotinic receptors by the time of death, whereas
muscarinic receptors are much less affected (Kellar et al.,
1987
; Araujo et al., 1988
). So far, therapeutic approaches
directed toward cholinergic systems in the brain have focused on
stimulation of postsyaptic muscarinic cholinergic receptors, either
directly with muscarinic agonists or indirectly by cholinesterase inhibition. Unfortunately these two strategies have thus far yielded only modest improvements in the cognitive functions of Alzheimer's patients. Stimulation of brain nicotinic receptors has been shown to
enhance cognitive function in lower mammals (Woodruff-Pak et al., 1994
; Arendash et al., 1995a
, b; Decker et
al., 1995
; Bjugstad et al., in press), consistent with
the idea that these nicotinic receptors may be potential targets
treatment of Alzheimer's and other dementias (Newhouse et
al., 1993
).
Molecular biological studies have revealed a plethora of nicotinic
receptor subunits in the vertebrate brain (Papke, 1993
; McGehee and
Role, 1995
; Lindstrom, 1996
; Albuquerque et al., 1997
). Although there is still little understanding of the functional consequences of this receptor multiplicity, several labs are
investigating the pharmacological properties of the predominant
nicotinic receptor subtypes occurring in the nervous system to provide
a rational basis for the design of compounds selective for particular
nicotinic receptor subtypes that influence particular mental or motor
functions (Decker et al., 1995
; de Fiebre et al.,
1995
). Flores et al. (1992)
have shown that the major
receptor subtype displaying high nicotine, cytisine and
methylcarbamyl-choline affinity in the rat brain is the alpha4-beta2
combination. A major receptor subtype showing low affinity for nicotine
but high affinity for BTX contains alpha7 subunits
(Wonnacott, 1986
; Luetje et al., 1990
).
Alpha7-containing receptors have been implicated in
cognitive processes affected by hippocampal function, including sensory
gating and spatial memory (Luntz-Leybman et al., 1992
;
Bjugstad et al., in press).
Pharmacological investigations of nicotinic receptors have been
facilitated by the availability of many potent natural toxins, including curare, the erythrina alkaloids, the algal toxin anatoxin-a (Swanson and Albuquerque, 1992
), the frog toxin epibatidine (Badio and
Daly, 1994
; Alkondon and Albuquerque, 1995
), the flowering plant toxin
methyllcaconitine (Ward et al., 1990
), and of course, nicotine. The pharmacological properties of some other potent nicotinic
toxins, including leptodactyline (Erspamer, 1959
) and anabaseine, have
not yet been reported in much detail.
Anabaseine (fig. 1) was initially
isolated from a marine worm, but has subsequently been found in certain
species of ants (Kem et al., 1971
; Wheeler et
al., 1981
). It is as toxic as nicotine when injected in mice (Kem
et al., 1976
), stimulates acetylcholine release from rat
brain cortical minces (Meyer et al., 1987
) and elevates
cortical ACh and norepinephrine levels in the intact rat (Summers
et al., 1997
). As with nicotine, anabaseine enhances passive
avoidance behavior in nucleus basalis-lesioned rats (Meyer et
al., 1994
). At the molecular level anabaseine differs from nicotine and anabasine by having a tetrahydropyridyl ring whose imine
double bond is electronically conjugated with the 3-pyridyl ring (fig.
1). This causes its two rings to be approximately coplanar in their
relative orientation, whereas the two rings in the tobacco alkaloids
nicotine and anabasine are almost perpendicular to each other (Whidby
and Seeman, 1976
; Seeman, 1984
).
|
Because some anabaseine derivatives have been shown to enhance a
variety of cognitive behaviors (Meyer et al., 1994
;
Woodruff-Pak et al., 1994
; Arendash et al.,
1995b
), we examined the pharmacological properties of anabaseine on a
variety of vertebrate, mostly mammalian, nicotinic receptors. To
quantitatively compare anabaseine with the tobacco alkaloids, we
measured the potencies and binding affinities of all three compounds on
the same receptors under identical experimental conditions. Several
important pharmacological differences were found to exist between the
three compounds. Each displays a unique spectrum of action upon the
various nicotinic receptors. Our data indicate that these compounds
will be useful molecular models to design agonists selective for
particular nicotinic receptors. Portions of this study were previously
reported in abstract form (Kem and Papke, 1992
; Kem et al.,
1994a
).
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chemicals.
Anabaseine was synthesized according to Bloom
(1990)
. The fully ionized, synthetic ammonium-ketone dihydrochloride
salt (MW 251) was used in all of our experiments. DMAB-anabaseine
dihydrochloride was synthesized as previously described (Kem, 1971
;
Zoltewicz et al., 1989
). Stock solutions of anabaseine,
anabasine, nicotine and DMAB-anabaseine were kept in the dark at 5°C
for a maximum of 1 wk to avoid deterioration of the alkaloids.
(S)-Anabasine free base and reagents used to synthesize anabaseine were
obtained from Aldrich (Nukwayjee, WI); (S)-nicotine free base,
mecamylamine and other experimental drugs from Sigma Chemical Co. (St.
Louis, MO); BTX and TTX from Boehringer-Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN). Radioisotopically labeled compounds, 3H-MCC,
125ICl and 86RbCl were
purchased from Du Pont-New England Nuclear (Boston, MA).
Frog skeletal muscle contractility. The two symmetrical rectus abdominis muscles of each frog (Rana pipiens, purchased from Nasco, Ft. Atkinson, WI) were used so that anabaseine potency relative to nicotine or anabasine could be measured on muscles from the same animal. Each muscle was mounted in a 10-ml tissue bath containing frog saline (115 mM NaCl, 5.0 mM KCl, 7.0 mM CaCl2 and 2.0 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2) which was continuously bubbled with oxygen at room temperature. The resting tension was initially adjusted to 1.0 g. After 30 min the muscles were briefly (20 sec) contracted with isotonic KCl saline (NaCl replaced with KCl) to measure the maximum isometric force of contracture. After complete recovery, each muscle was challenged with a sequence of 9 or 10 increasing concentrations of agonist until a maximum contractural force was observed. After each application the muscles were washed twice with normal saline and allowed to recover at least 30 min before the next contracture, due to the relatively slow relaxation after exposure to the three alkaloids. After the various agonist concentrations were tested, the final contractility of each muscle was again measured with isotonic KCl saline. A concentration-response curve for each muscle was constructed and expressed as a percentage of the average KCl-induced contracture force. The concentration-response data for each compound was fitted to the Hill equation using SigmaPlot and the EC50 and its S.E. were calculated from the computer-fitted curve.
Patch clamp experiments with neuromuscular type nicotinic
receptors.
BC3H-1 cells were cultured according to Covarrubias
et al. (1989)
. During single channel recordings they were
bathed in a saline containing 140 mM NaCl, 5.4 KCl, 10 mM NaHEPES, 1.8 mM CaCl2 and 2.0 mM MgCl2
titrated to pH 7.4. Single channels were recorded from cell-attached
patches. The pipette saline containing agonist was otherwise identical
to the bath saline. In most cases, cells were incubated for 5 to 12 min
with 48 nM BTX before recordings to reduce the number of available
channels in a patch. Single channel records were stored on videotape
using a digital audioprocesser (20 kHz bandwidth). For computer
analysis of single channel records, recordings were replayed and
digitized at 50 kHz with analog filtering to yield a bandwidth of 5 kHz. Single channel events were analyzed with standard half amplitude
threshold crossing methods (Auerbach and Lingle, 1987
).
Xenopus oocyte expression and functional analysis of rat brain
nicotinic receptors.
Preparation of in vitro
synthesized cRNA transcripts and oocyte injection have been described
previously (de Fiebre et al., 1995
). Recordings were made 2 to 7 days after injections. Oocytes were placed in a Lucite recording
chamber with a 0.6 ml total volume and perfused at room temperature
with frog saline (115 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.8 mM
CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.3) containing 1 µM
atropine to block potential muscarinic responses. Calcium-activated chloride channels were not suppressed in our experiments, because their
functional presence does not affect the agonist concentration-response relation (Papke et al., 1977a). Drugs were diluted in
perfusion solution and then applied after preloading of a 2.0 ml length of tubing at the terminus of the perfusion system. A Mariotte flask
filled with Ringer saline was used to maintain a constant hydrostatic
pressure for drug deliveries and washes. The rate (6 ml/min) of drug
delivery was constant for all compound concentrations and receptor
subtypes. Current responses to drug administration were measured using
a two electrode voltage clamp with a holding potential of -50 mV.
Recordings were made using a Warner Instruments oocyte amplifier
interfaced with National Instruments LabView software.
Radioligand binding to nicotinic receptors.
The steady-state
binding of the three nicotinic compounds to neuromuscular type
receptors was measured indirectly by assessing their ability to inhibit
the rate of 125I-BTX binding to Torpedo
californica membranes prepared according to Eldefrawi et
al. (1980)
.
Measurement of ganglionic nicotinic receptor activation.
Rat
pheochromocytoma (PC 12) cells grown in the absence of nerve growth
factor on polylysine-coated plastic culture dishes were loaded
overnight with 86Rb preceding the efflux assays,
which were carried out essentially as described by Lukas and Cullen
(1988)
at pH 7.4. After washing away extracellular rubidium three
times, the agonist (in saline containing 10 µM atropine sulfate to
inhibit muscarinic receptors and 0.5 mM ouabain to prevent rubidium
reuptake by active transport) was added and 1 min later the released
rubidium was removed for gamma counting. The rubidium efflux during
agonist stimulation was expressed as a percent of total cellular
rubidium released by 1 mM carbachol during the same time. All efflux
estimates were corrected for spontaneous efflux in the absence of
agonist. The amount of 86Rb remaining after the 1 min test period in each cell sample was determined after exposure to
1.0 M NaOH for at least 1 hr. All measurements were done in
quadruplicate.
i.c.v. administration of anabaseine.
When injected i.c.v.
with a nicotinic agonist, rats rapidly become immobile with extended
legs (Abood et al., 1981
). This prostration response was
used to compare the central activity of anabaseine relative to
nicotine. After implantation of a metal cannula into the third
ventricle, 5 days were allowed for recovery from surgery. The rat
received injections with 2 or 4 µl of the experimental compound
dissolved in sterile 0.9% NaCl solution, pH 6.5. Prostration was
judged to have occurred when all four legs of the Sprague-Dawley male
rat (250-300 g) remained laterally extended for at least 10 sec. To
detect prostration each rat was observed for at least 5 min after
injection. All rats that were not prostrated after injection were
killed after an additional i.c.v. injection of Evan's blue dye to
ascertain that the cannula was operational; the result was not used if
the dye was absent from the lateral ventricular space.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Activation of frog neuromuscular nicotinic receptors by anabaseine. Anabaseine acted as a potent nicotinic agonist on frog rectus abdominis muscle. A wide variety of natural toxins and synthetic compounds have previously been tested on this preparation, which facilitated quantitative comparison of anabaseine with these other substances (table 1). When the median effective concentrations of the active, monocationic forms of each compound were compared, anabaseine was only 14- and 3.7-fold less potent, respectively, than epibatidine and anatoxin-a, which are the most potent nicotinic agonists thus far reported. Nicotine was 6.7-fold and cytisine 23-fold less potent than anabaseine.
|
|
|
Interaction of nicotinoid compounds with electric fish muscle nicotinic receptors. The relative abilities of the three nicotinoid compounds to inhibit 125I-BTX binding to Torpedo electric organ membranes are shown in figure 4. Anabaseine displayed the highest affinity of the three compounds although anabasine displayed the lowest affinity (table 2). The relative Kd for the electric fish muscle were very similar with the frog rectus muscle potency (EC50) estimates shown in table 3.
|
|
|
Activation of mammalian neuromuscular nicotinic receptors by
anabaseine.
The ability of anabaseine to activate mouse embryonic
neuromuscular type nicotinic receptors was examined using cell-attached single channel recordings from the clonal BC3H-1 cell line. The single
channel conductance in the presence of anabaseine was indistinguishable from that obtained using ACh. As reported for other nicotinic agonists
(Colquhoun and Sakmann, 1985
; Sine and Steinbach, 1986
; Papke et
al., 1988
), a low anabaseine concentration (40 nM) caused two
types of open channel activity: short duration (<500 µsec) bursts
resulting primarily from single brief openings and long duration (>3
msec) bursts that were often interrupted by brief closures (results not
shown). Histograms of burst durations revealed two components. The
average duration of the longer component was somewhat shorter than for
bursts activated by ACh, although the voltage-dependence of the burst
durations was similar for both agonists. In some cases three components
better described the distribution of burst durations, a characteristic
also noted for bursts activated by ACh (Colquhoun and Sakmann, 1985
).
|
1 sec
1. This
linear dependence of the short gap frequency on anabaseine concentration is consistent with simple channel block behavior, as
described for numerous channel blockers (Ogden and Colquhoun, 1985
1 sec
1.
Considering the correction for missed events in the latter case, this
blocking rate is comparable to that from analysis of the blocking gap
frequency. The duration (fig. 6C) of the corrected blocking gap
increased with membrane hyperpolarization (e-fold per 66 mV), although
the frequency per unit open time of the fast gap (fig. 6D) exhibited
only a slight increase (e-fold per 150 mV) with hyperpolarization.
Analysis of the voltage-dependence of open interval durations also
indicates that the forward rate of blockade is less voltage-dependent
than the unblocking rate.
|
|
Rat brain neuronal nicotinic receptors: Xenopus oocyte experiments. At alpha7 receptors anabaseine and anabasine displayed very similar efficacies, although nicotine was significantly less efficacious (fig. 8A). Anabaseine and anabasine displayed the highest potencies for homomeric alpha7 receptor. The concentration dependence of recovery in responsiveness to ACh to each compound displayed the same concentration dependence as its agonist activity (fig. 8B).
|
|
Rat brain neuronal nicotinic receptors: radioligand binding
experiments.
Next we examined the ability of anabaseine, anabasine
and nicotine to bind to rat brain neuronal receptors using two
radioligand binding assays, involving displacement of
125I-BTX and 3H-MCC
binding. Displacement of the first radioligand predominantly measures
interaction with alpha7-containing receptors although displacement of the second one measures
alpha4-beta2 receptor binding (Flores et
al., 1992
).
|
|
|
Anabaseine stimulation of autonomic nicotinic receptors.
All
three nicotinic agonists acted as high efficacy nicotinic receptor
agonists on PC12 cells (table 3). The major ganglionic nicotinic
receptor (Rogers et al., 1992
) in this transformed cell line
consists of alpha3 and beta4 subunits, and was
previously shown to possess relatively low affinity for nicotine and
ACh in functional assays (Lukas and Cullen, 1988
; Lukas, 1989; Wong et al., 1995
). Because maximum nicotinic stimulation of the
cells by the three alkaloids and carbamylcholine caused the release of
only a small (usually less than 10%) fraction of the internal rubidium, our efflux measurements with this ion should reflect the
average extent of receptor activation over the time (1 min) of the
measurement. All three compounds acted as full agonists relative to
carbachol (concentration-response curves not shown). When concentration
was expressed in terms of the active cationic form of each compound,
the potencies of the three nicotinoid compounds were very similar
(table 3).
|
Intracerebroventricular administration of anabaseine: rat
prostration experiments.
On a mole basis, anabaseine was
approximately 2.7-fold less potent than nicotine in causing prostration
when administered into the lateral ventricle of the unanesthetized rat
(fig. 14). If only the monocationic
forms of the two compounds are active, this equipotent mole ratio would
become nearly one. Nicotine was less potent in our experiments than was
previously reported by Abood et al. (1981)
. This may have
been due to our use of a slightly more stringent behavioral endpoint
for assessing prostration, as described in the Methods section.
Mecamylamine and DHBE both inhibited the prostrating action of
anabaseine. A large dose (80 µg) of DMAB-anabaseine failed to
prostrate rats but did partially inhibit the prostrating action of
nicotine.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anabaseine selectively stimulates nicotinic receptors.
Although anabaseine stimulated all of the nicotinic receptor
preparations that we investigated, its high potency upon neuromuscular and alpha7 nicotinic receptors is particularly noteworthy.
On the skeletal muscle membrane, anabaseine appears to work entirely on
nicotinic receptors, because its action could be completely blocked by
the insurmountable antagonist BTX. Nerve action potentials were
unaffected by this compound, even at millimolar concentrations (Kem,
1971
). However, an effect at nerve terminals cannot yet be ruled out,
as some mammalian motoneuron terminals seem to possess nicotinic
receptors. Anabaseine affected neither rat brain muscarinic receptors
nor plasma cholinesterase, except at very high concentrations (>100
µM) where nonspecific membrane effects often occur (Kem et
al., 1994c
). Stimulation of the rat brain
5-HT3 receptor, which possesses a subunit
sequence homologous with nicotinic receptor subunits, was only
inhibited by 24% in the presence of 100 µM anabaseine (Machu
et al., 1996
). Thus, anabaseine is expected to selectively
act on nicotinic receptors at concentrations of less than 100 µM.
Anabaseine actions upon single neuromuscular channels.
The
results show that the characteristics of openings and groups of
openings activated by anabaseine at both low and high concentrations
share many similarities to properties of openings activated by ACh.
Based on the total concentration (~10 µM) of anabaseine at which a
half maximal channel open probability is achieved, anabaseine activates
the mouse embryonic neuromuscular nicotinic receptor with an apparent
affinity slightly less than that of ACh (2-10 µM; Sine and
Steinbach, 1987
; C. Lingle, unpublished results). However, because the
cyclic minimum concentration of anabaseine is only 29% of its total
concentration at pH 7.4, this active form of anabaseine is probably
slightly more potent than ACh on this mammalian receptor, as at the
amphibian neuromuscular receptor (table 1). In our experiments the
intrinsic activity or true efficacy (after correcting for its
channel-blocking action) of anabaseine displayed a limiting open
probability of less than 0.8 compared with values in excess of 0.9 for
ACh (Sine and Steinbach, 1987
; Zhang et al., 1995
). A higher
limiting po value for the compound might have
been achieved if higher anabaseine concentrations had been tested.
Electrophysiological comparison of the three alkaloids on
oocyte-expressed neuronal nicotinic receptors.
Anabaseine (Papke
et al., 1994
) and anabasine (table 3) both displayed low
efficacies on the Xenopus oocyte expressed
alpha4-beta2 receptor. A submaximal efficacy on
this receptor has previously been observed with other potent nicotinic
agonists, including cytisine, anatoxin-a, epibatidine, nicotine
and the synthetic nicotinic agonist ABT-418 (Papke and Heinemann,
1994
; Alkondon and Albuquerque, 1995
; Papke et al., in
press). Apparently the ligand molecular requirements for activating
this receptor subtype are even more stringent than those for high
affinity binding. Because most of the agonists that display high
affinity are larger, less flexible molecules, high efficacy may be
related to an ability to bind within a relatively restricted space on
this receptor. An alternative interpretation would be that the
alpha4-beta2 receptor channel is more readily
blocked by receptor agonists, which would be reflected in a smaller
maximum response or efficacy (Papke et al., 1997
b).
Patch-clamp analyses of the actions of these agonists are clearly
needed to determine the basis for the reduced apparent efficacy of
these compounds on alpha4-beta2 and
alpha7 nicotinic receptors.
Anabaseine interaction with rat brain membrane nicotinic
receptors.
Our binding data with the naturally expressed
BTX-binding nicotinic receptor is in agreement with our functional data
on the oocyte-expressed homomeric alpha7 receptor. Quik
et al. (1996)
have reported an excellent correspondence
between the ligand binding properties of the rat brain
alpha7-containing receptor and those of the homomeric
alpha7 receptor expressed in a transfected cell line, which
is consistent with the notion that the alpha7 receptor in
the rat brain may also be homomeric. However, Anand et al. (1993)
have observed some pharmacological differences between the
artificially expressed homomeric chick alpha7 receptor and brain receptors containing the alpha7 subunit, so at least
in the chick brain the receptors are not the same.
anabaseine> anabasine
(table 2), were in excellent agreement with the rank order of potencies
shown in table 3, the Ki and
EC50 concentrations for each alkaloid were quite
different. These differences arise from the fact that the steady-state
binding assay measures the affinity of the desensitized receptor,
whereas the functional assay measures the affinity of the activateable receptor. It is interesting that the ratio,
EC50/Ki for
anabaseine was only 131, compared to a ratio of 3410 for nicotine.
Anabaseine actions on PC12 cells and parasympathetic neurons.
On PC12 cell receptors anabaseine displayed a potency similar to
nicotine and anabasine when the extent of ionization was taken into
consideration, and the maximal responses (data not shown) were nearly
identical with that of carbachol. The uncorrected EC50 value of 29 µM for nicotine stimulation of
86Rb efflux is in excellent agreement with other
reported nicotine EC50 values for these cells (29 µM, Kemp and Edge, 1987
; 20 µM, Lukas, 1989). However, our
observation that the maximal effect of nicotine on PC12 cells is
comparable with the 1 mM carbamylcholine response differs from some
previously reported data that indicated that nicotine's maximal effect
was significantly less than the effect of 1 mM carbamylcholine (Lukas
and Cullen, 1988
; Lukas, 1989). Several factors, such as differences in
the composition or degree of expression of nicotinic receptors between
different PC12 cultures, could possibly contribute to such a
difference. PC12 cells express other nicotinic receptor subunits
besides alpha4 and beta3 (Rogers et
al., 1992
). PC12 alpha7 receptors bind BTX, but
probably have at most, only a small contribution to the rubidium fluxes
we measured over a 1-min interval (Kemp and Edge, 1987
; Rogers et
al., 1991
).
Whole animal actions of anabaseine.
At an initial stage of
this investigation the rat prostration response to lateral ventricular
injection of nicotinic agonists was selected as an in vivo
bioassay for demonstrating neuronal nicotinic agonist activity of
anabaseine. The in vivo agonistic and antagonistic
activities of a variety of nicotinic compounds, neurotransmitters and
toxins had previously been demonstrated using this assay (Abood
et al., 1981
). The prostration response displayed pronounced
stereo-specificity for the (S)-form of nicotine, as had been observed
in radioligand binding experiments with the brain high nicotine
affinity binding site. Because displacement of BTX binding to low
affinity receptors shows little stereospecificity (Wonnacott, 1986
),
the existing data suggest that alpha7 type receptors do not
play a major role in causing this prostration response. Abood et
al. (1981)
reported that i.c.v. injection of hexamethonium or
mecamylamine immediately preceding nicotine administration partially
inhibited its prostrating action. They also reported that
preadministration of BTX or TC failed to inhibit the action of
prostrating action of nicotine, although TC injected alone caused
seizures.
Preferential actions of the three alkaloids upon particular
nicotinic receptors.
To compare nicotinic agonists in molecular
terms, it is necessary to quantitatively express potencies in terms of
the concentration of the active form of each compound. This can be
estimated with knowledge of the bulk pH of the saline and the pKa of
the ionizable group. Fixed negative charges might alter the local pH at
the ACh recognition site, so that it may differ from that of the bulk pH (Stauffer and Karlin, 1994
). For instance, a slightly lower local pH
at the ACh recognition site would enhance agonist ionization and
increase the estimated potencies of secondary and tertiary amine
compounds relative to a quaternary ammonium salt like carbamylcholine. Correction for the local pH effect would probably not greatly affect
the potency comparisons of the non-quaternary compounds in table 1.
Structural comparison of anabaseine with the two tobacco
alkaloids.
Both nicotine and anabasine possess a tetrahedral
chiral carbon at position 2 of the saturated ring, whereas the same
carbon atom in anabaseine is part of a trigonal imine bond whose pi
electrons are conjugated with those of the pyridyl ring. Conformational analyses predict that the saturated ring is twisted approximately 90 degrees out of the plane of the pyridyl ring in nicotine and anabasine
(Whidby and Seeman, 1976
; Seeman, 1984
), although the two rings of
anabaseine are coplanar (Prokai et al., in preparation).
Comparison of anabaseine with 3-substituted anabaseines.
Our
study now provides a foundation for understanding the pharmacological
properties of the benzylidene and cinnamylidene derivatives of
anabaseines, including DMAB-, DMXB- and DMAC-anabaseines, which
preferentially stimulate neuronal nicotinic receptors containing alpha7 subunits (Kem et al., 1994c
; Meyer
et al., 1994
; Papke et al., 1994
; de Fiebre
et al., 1995
) and enhance cognitive behavior (Woodruff-Pak
et al., 1994
; Meyer et al., 1994
; Arendash
et al., 1995b
; Bjugstad et al., in press). As
with anabaseine, these compounds display high affinity and efficacy on
alpha7 receptors but low affinity and efficacy with
alpha4-beta2 receptors. Thus, the 3-substitution of anabaseine merely increases further an alpha7
vs. alpha4-beta2 preferential activity
already present in anabaseine. 3-Substituted anabaseines also lack
significant agonist activity on peripheral nicotinic receptors of the
autonomic and neuromuscular types (Kem et al., 1994c
). It is
extremely interesting that the addition of a 3-substituent to
anabaseine seems to diminish its peripheral nervous system and
alpha4-beta2 stimulation without reducing central alpha7 stimulation. This is probably the major
pharmacodynamic advantage of the 3-substituted anabaseines over the
parent toxin. One of these derivatives, DMXB-anabaseine (also known as
GTS-21; Kem et al., 1996
), is currently in clinical trials
for possible treatment of Alzheimer's dementia. Further studies are
needed to fully understand the nature of the molecular differences
between the 3-substituted derivatives of anabaseine and the natural
toxin.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The authors thank Drs. Linda Bloom and Katalin Prokai-Tatrai for synthesizing anabaseine, Sima Jain and Jeff Thinschmidt for assistance in carrying out the Xenopus oocyte experiments, Baixi Lin for carrying out the intestinal smooth muscle experiments, Ma'an Raja for carrying out the frog rectus muscle experiments and many computer analyses, Linda Abraham for carrying out the rat prostration experiments, Dr. Scott Rogers for providing the PC12 cell line and Ms. Judy Adams for assistance in preparation of the manuscript.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication June 19, 1997.
Received for publication January 7, 1997.
1 This work was supported by Taiho Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd., Tokushima, Japan.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. William R. Kem, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0267.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
ACh, acetylcholine; BTX, alpha-bungarotoxin; DHBE, dihydro-B-erythroidine; i.c.v., intracerebroventricular; 3H-MCC, 3H-methylcarbamylcholine; TC, d-tubocurarine; TXX, tetrodotoxin.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
a new source of pyridine neurotoxins.
Experientia
32: 684-686, 1976[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. L. Papke, W. R. Kem, F. Soti, G. Y. Lopez-Hernandez, and N. A. Horenstein Activation and Desensitization of Nicotinic {alpha}7-type Acetylcholine Receptors by Benzylidene Anabaseines and Nicotine J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2009; 329(2): 791 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Freedman, A. Olincy, R. W. Buchanan, J. G. Harris, J. M. Gold, L. Johnson, D. Allensworth, A. Guzman-Bonilla, B. Clement, M. P. Ball, et al. Initial Phase 2 Trial of a Nicotinic Agonist in Schizophrenia Am J Psychiatry, August 1, 2008; 165(8): 1040 - 1047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Horenstein, T. J. McCormack, C. Stokes, K. Ren, and R. L. Papke Reversal of Agonist Selectivity by Mutations of Conserved Amino Acids in the Binding Site of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors J. Biol. Chem., February 23, 2007; 282(8): 5899 - 5909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Zhang, N. A. White, F. S. Soti, W. R. Kem, and T. K. Machu N-Terminal Domains in Mouse and Human 5-Hydroxytryptamine3A Receptors Confer Partial Agonist and Antagonist Properties to Benzylidene Analogs of Anabaseine J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2006; 317(3): 1276 - 1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Rayes, G. Spitzmaul, S. M. Sine, and C. Bouzat Single-Channel Kinetic Analysis of Chimeric {alpha}7-5HT3A Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2005; 68(5): 1475 - 1483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. R. Kem, V. M. Mahnir, L. Prokai, R. L. Papke, X. Cao, S. LeFrancois, K. Wildeboer, K. Prokai-Tatrai, J. Porter-Papke, and F. Soti Hydroxy Metabolites of the Alzheimer's Drug Candidate 3-[(2,4-Dimethoxy)Benzylidene]-Anabaseine Dihydrochloride (GTS-21): Their Molecular Properties, Interactions with Brain Nicotinic Receptors, and Brain Penetration Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2004; 65(1): 56 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Machu, M. E. Hamilton, T. F. Frye, C. L. Shanklin, M. C. Harris, H. Sun, T. E. Tenner Jr., F. S. Soti, and W. R. Kem Benzylidene Analogs of Anabaseine Display Partial Agonist and Antagonist Properties at the Mouse 5-Hydroxytryptamine3A Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2001; 299(3): 1112 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Vazquez and R. E. Oswald Identification of a New Amino Acid Residue Capable of Modulating Agonist Efficacy at the Homomeric Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor, alpha 7 Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 1999; 55(1): 1 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||