JPET Celsis microsomes equal better data

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, P.
Right arrow Articles by Smart, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, P.
Right arrow Articles by Smart, T. G.

Vol. 282, Issue 2, 513-520, 1997

Regulation of Neuronal and Recombinant GABAA Receptor Ion Channels by Xenovulene A, a Natural Product Isolated from Acremonium strictum

P. Thomas, H. Sundaram, B. J. Krishek, P. Chazot , X. Xie, P. Bevan, S. J. Brocchini, C. J. Latham, P. Charlton, M. Moore, S. J. Lewis, D. M. Thornton, F. A. Stephenson and T. G. Smart

The School of Pharmacy, Departments of Pharmacology (P.T., B.J.K., X.X., T.G.S.) and Pharmaceutical Chemistry (H.S., P.C., F.A.S.), London, WC1N 1AX, and Xenova Ltd., (P.B., S.J.B., C.J.L., P.C., M.M., S.J.L., D.M.T.), Slough, SL1 4EF, United Kingdom


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Xenovulene A (XR368) is a natural product exhibiting little structural resemblance with classical benzodiazepines yet is able to displace high-affinity ligand binding to the benzodiazepine site of the gamma -aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor. We have characterized this compound and an associated congener (XR7009) by use of radioligand binding and electrophysiological methodologies with native neurons and the Xenopus oocyte expression system. Xenovulene A, and the more potent XR7009, inhibited [3H]flunitrazepam binding to rat forebrain with Ki values of 7 and 192 nM, and 1.7 and 42 nM, respectively, each site accounting for approximately 50% of the total specific binding. In cerebellar and spinal cord membranes, these ligands identified only single binding sites. These ligands demonstrated no intrinsic agonist activity at recombinant GABAA receptors comprising alpha 1beta 1gamma 2S subunits expressed in Xenopus oocytes, yet at 1 µM both significantly potentiated the GABA-induced response and reduced the GABA EC50 from 10.9 (control) to 5.1 (Xenovulene A) or 2.7 µM (XR7009). The rank potency order for enhancement of the 10 µM GABA response is: XR7009 (EC50, 0.02 µM) > diazepam (0.03) > Xenovulene A (0.05) > flurazepam (0.17). The activity of XR368 and XR7009 was reduced by the benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil, and absent in receptors devoid of the gamma 2 subunit. These agents exhibited receptor subtype selectivity because alpha 3beta 1gamma 2S receptors were less sensitive to these compounds relative to alpha 1 subunit-containing receptors, whereas alpha 6beta 1gamma 2S receptors were completely insensitive. Potentiation of the response to GABA on native GABAA receptors in cortical neurons substantiates the profile of the novel structures of Xenovulene A and XR7009 as specific benzodiazepine agonists.


    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

It is over 30 years since the introduction of the benzodiazepines into clinical practice for the relief of anxiety. Since then, the usage of these agents has diversified into anticonvulsant, hypnotic and also muscle-relaxant applications (Woods et al., 1992). During this period of clinical application, considerable evidence has indicated that the major site of action of the benzodiazepines occurs at the GABAA receptor (Polc, 1988). Activation of this receptor accounts for the majority of inhibitory synaptic neurotransmission in the CNS and molecular cloning studies imply that the GABAA receptor probably is composed of five polypeptide subunits that participate in forming an integral ion channel (Nayeem et al., 1994; Rabow et al., 1995; Sieghart, 1995). The subunits are members of distinct "families," designated as alpha , beta , gamma  and delta , and, with the exception of the delta  subunit, the families comprise multiple subunit members, i.e., alpha (1-6), beta (1-4), gamma (1-4) and delta  (Sieghart, 1995).

Of particular interest to benzodiazepine pharmacology is the observation that the expression of different combinations of GABAA receptor subunits can influence the pharmacological sensitivity to benzodiazepine agonists (Wisden and Seeburg, 1992). Previously, the sensitivity of GABAA receptors to the benzodiazepines had been categorized into "type I or type II," a feature based largely on benzodiazepine agonist selectivity. Recently, the expression of recombinant GABAA receptors has indicated that the differentiation of benzodiazepine pharmacology into type I or II, and now type III categories, depends largely on the type of alpha  subunit present. For example, alpha 1 subunit-containing receptors are associated with type I benzodiazepine pharmacology, whereas alpha 2, alpha 3 and alpha 5 are associated with type II. The alpha 6 subunit presently constitutes the type III category. In addition to influencing the binding and benzodiazepine pharmacology, the positive regulatory effect of the benzodiazepines on GABAA receptor function can be removed by eliminating the gamma subunit from the receptor complex (Pritchett et al., 1989; Wisden and Seeburg, 1992).

The recent discovery of a secondary metabolite, (2aR*, 5aR*, 7E,11E,14aS* , 14bS* , 14cS*)- 2a,5a,6,9,10,13,14,14a, 14b,14c-decahydro - 4 - hydroxy-5a,9,9,12-tetramethyl-1,5dioxacyclopenta[cd]-cycloundec[f]inden-3(2H)-one (Xenovulene A), extracted from the microorganism, Acremonium strictum, and its ability to displace high-affinity ligand binding to the benzodiazepine site on the GABAA receptor (Ainsworth et al., 1995), was of interest, because this compound is structurally unrelated to the classical benzodiazepine ligands. We undertook the present study for two reasons: to ascertain the binding characteristics of this novel substance and a related derivative, with use of neuronal preparations noted for differences in benzodiazepine selectivity; and to analyze how these agents can functionally regulate both native neuronal and selected recombinant GABAA receptors by binding to the allosteric "benzodiazepine site."

A preliminary account of some of these results has been published previously in abstract form (Thomas et al., 1996; Sundaram et al., 1996).

    Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Production of Xenovulene A (XR368). Xenovulene A was prepared from A. strictum (Accession number IMI 354451) by fermentation and down-stream processing by procedures described previously (Ainsworth et al., 1995; Blackburn et al., 1996).

Preparation of XR7009. Dibasic sodium phosphate (1.58 g, 11.13 mmol) was added to a solution of Xenovulene A (400 mg, 1.12 mmol) in anhydrous dichloromethane (20 ml). The resulting mixture was cooled to 0°C, and a solution of 3-chloroperbenzoic acid (424 mg, 1.23 mmol) in anhydrous dichloromethane (5 ml) was added dropwise with rapid stirring. After addition was complete the reaction mixture was maintained at 0°C for a further 30 min.

Further dichloromethane (100 ml) was then added and the resultant mixture filtered through celite. The filtrate was washed with sodium thiosulfate solution (5% (w/v), 3 × 25 ml), saturated sodium carbonate solution (2 × 25 ml) and finally brine (2 × 25 ml). The solution obtained was dried briefly with MgSO4, filtered through celite and evaporated in vacuo to yield a colorless oil. This was redissolved in ethyl acetate (25 ml) and hexane (40 ml) was added. All solvents were immediately evaporated in vacuo to yield XR7009, ((2aR*,5aR*,7E,11E,14aS*,14bS*,14cS*)-11,12-epoxy-2a,5a,6,9,10,13,14,14a,14b,14c-decahydro-4-hydroxy-5a,9,9,12-tetramethyl-1,5-dioxacyclopenta[cd]-cycloundec[f]inden-3(2H)-one; 275 mg, yield 66%). XR7009 had the following spectroscopic characteristics:

1H NMR (d4-MeOH): delta  1.08 (3H, s), 1.24 (3H, s), 1.30 (3H, s), 1.36 (2H, m), 1.48 (3H, s), 1.52 (2H, m), 1.78 (1H, d, J = 12Hz), 1.92 (1H, m), 2.08 (1H, m), 2.50 (1H, m), 2.74 (2H, m), 2.96 (1H, m), 3.64 (1H, t, J = 6Hz), 3.72 (1H, m), 3.78 (1H, m), 3.96 (1H, d, J = 10Hz), 5.48 (2H, m). Mass spectrum: (CI, NH3) MH+ 375. Mass spectrum: (CI, CH4). Calculated for C22H31O5 375.2172 (as MH+); found 375.2164 (Delta  = 2 ppm). Tlc: (MeOH/CH2Cl2 1:80 (v/v) on silica gel) Rf = 0.2.

Radioligand binding. Rat brain membranes were prepared as described previously (Duggan and Stephenson, 1988). Membranes were isolated from adult rat forebrain, cerebellum and spinal cord, then thoroughly washed and freeze-thawed three times before incubation with 0.5 nM [3H]flunitrazepam or 5 nM [3H]Ro15-4513 in the presence and absence of competing drugs at 4°C for 1 h. Assays were performed in triplicate with a final volume of 1 ml. Samples were harvested by rapid filtration and washed in ice-cold phosphate buffered saline. Specific binding (calculated from the total and nonspecific binding) was defined as that inhibited by 10 µM diazepam and the results, expressed as mean ± S.E. mean, were analyzed by nonlinear least squares analysis using INPLOT (Ver 4.0; Graphpad Software). To assess the goodness-of-fit provided by single or two binding site models, the experimental results were compared with the theoretical fit by use of the Fisher (F) test.

Cell preparation: Xenopus oocytes. Oocytes were removed from anesthetized Xenopus laevis as described previously (Smart and Krishek, 1995) and placed in MBM containing (mM): 110, NaCl; 1, KCl; 2.4, NaHCO3; 7.5, Tris-HCl; 0.33, Ca(NO3)2; 0.41, CaCl2; 0.82, MgSO4; 50 µg/ml gentamycin (pH 7.6). Suitable oocytes (stages IV and V) were centrifuged at 700 to 1100 × g for 10 min at 10°C to reveal the nucleus into which 10 to 20 nl of cDNA solution (1 mg/ml), encoding for murine GABAA receptor subunits, was injected. Oocytes were then incubated at 19°C for 24 h and the MBM was replaced every 2 to 3 days. Murine cDNAs were cloned as EcoR1 fragments into the mammalian expression vector pGW1, as described previously (Krishek et al., 1994).

Cultured cortical neurons. Cerebral hemispheres were removed from postnatal rats (Wistar, day 1) and cut into 3 mm cubes before incubating in 0.25% (w/v) trypsin in Hanks' calcium-magnesium free balanced salt solution for 10 min at 37°C. Trypsin was inactivated by adding serum-containing growth medium. The tissue was triturated with polished Pasteur pipettes with decreasing orifice diameters. Cells were pooled and plated on poly-L-lysine coated 35 mm dishes in fresh growth medium based on: MEM (Earle's salts); 10% (v/v) horse serum, 2 mM glutamine, 5 mg/ml glucose, 200 U/ml and 200 µg/ml penicillin G and streptomycin, respectively. The cells were incubated at 37°C in 95% air/5%CO2. Non-neuronal cell growth was controlled after 5 days by including 10 µM cytosine arabinoside in the growth medium for 24 h. Sympathetic neurons were prepared according to the methods described by Smart (1992).

Electrophysiology: Intracellular recording. Whole-cell membrane currents and conductances were recorded from Xenopus oocytes using a two-electrode voltage clamp technique. Oocytes were superfused with an amphibian Ringer's solution containing (mM): 110, NaCl; 2, KCl; 5, HEPES; 1.8, CaCl2 (pH 7.4), at 10 to 15 ml/min (bath volume, 0.5 ml). Voltage and current microelectrodes (1-5 megohm) were filled with 3 M KCl and 0.6 M K2SO4, respectively. Currents were recorded using an Axoclamp 2A amplifier in conjunction with a Brush-Gould Ink pen recorder.

Whole-cell channel recording. Patch electrodes (1-5 megohm) were filled with the following solution containing (mM): 140, KCl; 2, MgCl2; 1, CaCl2; 10, HEPES; 11, ethyleneglycol-bis(beta -aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid; 2, ATP, pH 7.1. The cells were continuously superfused in the culture dish with a Krebs' solution containing (mM): 140, NaCl; 4.7, KCl; 1.2, MgCl2; 2.5, CaCl2; 10, HEPES; 11, glucose, pH 7.4. Membrane currents were recorded using an Axopatch 1C patch amplifier. Series resistance compensation of 80% was routinely achieved and membrane currents were filtered at 10 kHz (-3 dB, 6 pole Bessel filter, 36 dB/octave).

Analysis of ligand-modulated membrane conductances. The ligand-induced membrane conductance change (Delta G) was calculated by subtraction of the resting conductance. Conductances were ascertained by the application of brief hyperpolarizing voltage command steps (1 s duration, -10 mV amplitude, 0.2 Hz) which were superimposed on the holding potential (-30 to -50 mV) in the absence and presence of ligand as described previously (Krishek et al., 1994). These data were used to construct equilibrium concentration-response relationships for GABA. To pool dose-conductance data from more than one oocyte, all the conductances were normalized (Delta GN) to the conductance change produced by 10 µM GABA. These data were used to construct equilibrium concentration-response curves and fitted according to the following equation: Delta G/Delta Gmax = 1/(1 + (EC50/A)n), where Delta G and Delta Gmax represent the conductance increases induced at a given concentration (A) and a saturating concentration of ligand, respectively. EC50 defines the ligand concentration producing a half-maximal response, and nH represents the Hill coefficient.

Compounds. For electrophysiology, stock solutions of Xenovulene A and XR7009 were made up in ethanol and diluted before use in Ringer's solution. Final ethanol concentrations did not exceed 0.05% (v/v) and did not affect the GABA-activated responses. For radioligand binding, to avoid the precipitation of XR368 and XR7009 in the assay buffer, 10% (v/v) ethanol was also incorporated. This concentration of ethanol did not significantly affect [3H]flunitrazepam binding which was determined as 93 ± 4% of the controls in the absence of ethanol (n = 3, mean ± S.E.M.).

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Structures of Xenovulene A and XR7009. Xenovulene A and XR7009 bear no apparent resemblance to the structure of classical benzodiazepines (see fig. 1). The structure of Xenovulene A comprises an 11-membered humulene ring fused to a very unusual tricyclic ring system, the structure of which has been described previously (Ainsworth et al., 1995). The humulene ring is conformationally restricted by the presence of two trans double bonds and the rigid tricycle, which contains five chiral centers present at the ring junctions. The relative stereochemistries of these chiral centers leads to an overall concave conformation for the Xenovulene A molecule. XR7009 occurs as a minor co-metabolite of Xenovulene A and was first detected on the scale-up of the fermentation of Xenovulene A. However, XR7009, which differs from the parent compound by the selective epoxidation of one face of the trisubstituted C11-C12 double bond in the humulene ring, was routinely and more conveniently prepared as a semisynthetic derivative of Xenovulene A. 


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Structural comparison of diazepam with Xenovulene A and its synthetic derivative, XR7009. Diazepam (A) bears little structural resemblance to the compounds isolated in this study. Most significantly, the metabolite Xenovulene A (B) and its derivative XR7009 (C) uniquely possess an 11-membered humulene ring which appears to be significant in determining affinity for the "benzodiazepine receptor." It should be noted that bonds to hydrogen atoms are not represented, except in cases where their stereochemistry has particular importance.

Radioligand binding studies on GABAA receptors. The first indication that Xenovulene A could specifically interact with the "benzodiazepine binding site" on the mammalian GABAA receptor was evident from the ability of Xenovulene A to inhibit [3H]flunitrazepam binding to bovine brain membranes with an IC50 of 40 nM (Ainsworth et al., 1995). To further analyze the radioligand binding profile, three neuronal preparations containing GABAA receptors exhibiting differential sensitivities to some benzodiazepines (classified as types I to III) were selected from the rat CNS. These included membranes prepared from the forebrain (types I and II), cerebellum (predominantly type I and diazepam-insensitive type III) and spinal cord (type II > type I).

In competition radioligand binding assays, Xenovulene A inhibited [3H]flunitrazepam binding to adult rat forebrain membranes with an IC50 of 56 ± 9 nM (mean ± S.E.M., n = 5 experiments). Analysis of the binding data revealed that a two-binding site model was required to adequately describe the displacement of [3H]flunitrazepam by Xenovulene A (table 1, fig. 2). Two apparent inhibition constants (Ki) of 7 ± 2 and 192 ± 44 nM, were defined for Xenovulene A binding to designated high (Khigh) and low (Klow) affinity binding sites. Each dissociation constant accounted for approximately 50% of the total number of Xenovulene A binding sites. In comparison, the binding of both the type I selective ligands, zolpidem and beta -CCE, to forebrain membranes, were also described by a two-binding site model with equal proportions of high and low affinity sites (table 1; n = 3). In contrast, the binding of the nonselective (type I over type II) agents, diazepam, lorazepam, flurazepam and clobazepam (up to 100 µM, n = 3), were all described by a single binding site model (table 1). Competition assays for Xenovulene A on forebrain membranes were also analyzed in the presence of 100 µM GABA, which caused a 1.3-fold shift in the Ki values for Xenovulene A to an apparently higher affinity (data not shown).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Inhibition constants for a range of ligands displacing [3H]flunitrazepam binding from rat brain membranes

Specific [3H]flunitrazepam binding was determined in the presence and absence of individual ligands at 0.5 nM radioligand concentration. Competition curves for Xenovulene A, XR7009, zolpidem and beta -CCE, determined on forebrain membranes, were best described by a two-binding site model with the values for Khigh(a) and Klow(b) as shown. Values in parentheses correspond to the relative proportions (%) of high and low affinity sites. For cerebellar and spinal cord preparations, a single-binding site model sufficed. Independent of the membrane preparation, the data for the benzodiazepines, diazepam, lorazepam, flurazepam and clobazepam, fitted best to a single-binding site model. Results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. for three to seven experiments.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Inhibition of [3H]flunitrazepam binding by Xenovulene A and XR7009 in rat brain membranes. Results are expressed as percentages (mean ± S.E.M. of triplicate determinations) of specific [3H]flunitrazepam inhibition by Xenovulene A (X-A; A) and XR7009 (B) in rat forebrain (square ), cerebellar (bullet ) and spinal cord (black-triangle) membranes. Curves were fitted to data by use of a nonlinear least squares method, and the goodness-of-fit to theoretical single or two-binding site models was assessed with the Fisher (F) test. Similar results were obtained for displacements by Xenovulene A and XR7009 in three to seven separate experiments, the inhibition constants for which are summarized in table 1.

Xenovulene A also inhibited the binding of [3H]flunitrazepam to rat cerebellar and spinal cord membranes, but in contrast to the forebrain, the competition curves were adequately described by a single binding site model with apparent Ki values of 15 ± 4 (cerebellar, n = 5) and 177 ± 47 nM (spinal cord, n = 5). Competition curves for the Type I selective agents, zolpidem and beta -CCE, and the nonselective agents (Type I > Type II), diazepam, flurazepam, lorazepam and clobazepam, on cerebellar and spinal membranes, were also fitted to single binding site models (table 1).

The binding profile of the synthetic 11,12-epoxy derivative of Xenovulene A, designated as XR7009 (see fig. 1), was also investigated. With forebrain membranes, the displacement of [3H]flunitrazepam binding by XR7009 resulted in competition curves best described by assuming two binding sites with Khigh of 1.7 ± 0.5 nM and Klow of 42 ± 8 nM (n = 7; fig. 2, table 1)). Thus XR7009 exhibited a 4-fold higher apparent affinity for the forebrain benzodiazepine receptors when compared with Xenovulene A. The relative proportions of high and low affinity sites for XR7009 was shifted slightly in favor of the low-affinity site (42 ± 5 and 58 ± 5%, respectively, table 1). The displacement of [3H]flunitrazepam binding by XR7009 in cerebellar and spinal membranes was fitted with a single binding site model yielding Ki values of 6 ± 2 and 63 ± 20 nM, respectively (n = 7). The binding profiles for both Xenovulene A and XR7009 suggested that these agents may be Type I selective ligands. In agreement with this concept, both Xenovulene A and XR7009 did not affect the diazepam-insensitive high-affinity binding of the benzodiazepine [3H]Ro15-4513. This compound is associated with alpha 6 subunit-containing recombinant GABAA receptors and does not bind with high affinity to the alpha 1 subunit-containing receptors usually associated with Type I benzodiazepine pharmacology.

The apparent selectivity of Xenovulene A for the benzodiazepine receptor was confirmed by profiling Xenovulene A against a panel of 42 ligand binding assays targeting different neurotransmitter receptors and ion channel proteins. At 1 µM, Xenovulene A was found to be inactive (classified as < 50% inhibition of binding) against all of these receptors, except the central benzodiazepine receptor.

Regulation of GABAA receptors: Electrophysiological studies on native and recombinant receptors. The investigation of the functional effects of Xenovulene A, and the derivative XR7009, was conducted initially on recombinant GABAA receptors expressed in X. laevis oocytes. Both Xenovulene A and XR7009 (0.1-1 µM) were devoid of any intrinsic agonist activity when applied to oocytes expressing alpha 1beta 1gamma 2S subunit-containing GABAA receptors; however, 10 µM GABA-activated responses were significantly enhanced by these agents in a reversible manner (fig. 3A). The equilibrium-concentration response curve for GABA was shifted to the left by Xenovulene A, and more so by XR7009 (1 µM), without increasing the maximum response to GABA (fig. 3B). The EC50 for GABA was 10.9 ± 0.4 µM (n = 7) in control Ringer's solution, decreasing to 5.1 ± 0.2 µM (n = 4) in the presence of 1 µM Xenovulene A and 2.7 ± 0.1 µM (n = 4) in 1 µM XR7009. This type of positive modulation at the GABAA receptor is similar to that observed with benzodiazepines, but different from that expected for the barbiturates which generally increase the maximum response to GABA. Similarly, 1 µM flurazepam displaced the concentration-response curve to the left reducing the EC50 to 3.2 ± 0.16 µM (n = 3) without affecting the maximum response; whereas, 50 µM pentobarbitone displaced the curve leftward, reducing the EC50 to 1.06 ± 0.1 µM (n = 3), but increasing the maximum response to GABA (data not shown).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Positive modulation of the recombinant murine alpha 1beta 1gamma 2S GABAA receptor by Xenovulene A and XR7009. (A) Traces represent whole-cell membrane currents and conductance changes recorded from Xenopus oocytes after application of 10 µM GABA or 1 µM Xenovulene A (X-A), either alone or in combination. In this, and subsequent traces, membrane conductance was monitored continuously by application of brief hyperpolarizing voltage steps (1 s, -10 mV, 0.2Hz) superimposed on the holding potential (-30 to -50 mV). Solid lines represent the period of drug application, typically 30 s. Xenovulene A was observed to have no direct effect, yet was able to positively modulate the GABA-activated response in a reversible manner. (B) Equilibrium concentration-response curves for GABA (bullet ), and in the presence of 1 µM Xenovulene A (open circle ) or XR7009 (triangle ). The data are normalized to the response evoked by 10 µM GABA. Points represent mean ± S.E.M. of data gathered from four to seven experiments with 18 cells. These and subsequent curves were fitted to the logistic model described under "Materials and Methods."

To compare the relative potencies of Xenovulene A and XR7009 with some classical benzodiazepines and pentobarbitone, the response to 10 µM GABA was measured in the presence of different concentrations of these modulators. The percentage increase in the GABA-activated membrane conductance depended on the concentration of the modulator (fig. 4). For Xenovulene A, XR7009, diazepam and flurazepam (concentration range, 0.001-2.5 µM), the maximum enhancement induced was approximately 50% of the control response induced by 10 µM GABA. In comparison, pentobarbitone (0.1-500 µM) induced a maximum enhancement of approximately 180% (fig. 4). The EC50 values for the modulators enhancing the response to 10 µM GABA on alpha 1beta 1gamma 2S GABAA receptors are: Xenovulene A (EC50, 0.05 ± 0.02 µM; Hill coefficient, 1.6 ± 0.2), XR7009 (0.02 ± 0.01 µM; 2.5 ± 0.2), diazepam (0.03 ± 0.001 µM; 1.8 ± 0.2), flurazepam (0.17 ± 0.02 µM; 1.4 ± 0.2) and pentobarbitone (21.4 ± 3.6 µM; 1.1 ± 0.1; n = 4 cells). These values resulted in a relative potency order of: XR7009 >=  Diazepam > Xenovulene A > Flurazepam >>  Pentobarbitone. The benzodiazepine-type profiles of Xenovulene A and XR7009 were further established by the inhibition of the enhancements with the benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil (1-5 µM, fig. 5A). Moreover, effectively removing the gamma 2 subunit from the receptor complex, by expressing alpha 1beta 1 subunits in oocytes, resulted in a loss of activity for Xenovulene A (fig. 5B), XR7009, flurazepam and diazepam, whereas the activity of pentobarbitone was apparently unaffected (data not shown).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Relative potencies of Xenovulene A and XR7009 in modulating the control GABA response in oocytes expressing alpha 1beta 1gamma 2S GABAA receptors. Concentration-response relationships for Xenovulene A (open circle ) and XR7009 (triangle ), relative to the GABA modulators diazepam (black-square), flurazepam (black-triangle) and pentobarbitone (down-triangle) in enhancing the control response to 10 µM GABA (defined as 0% enhancement). Values represent the mean ± S.E.M. of data gathered from 18 cells.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Pharmacological profile of Xenovulene A. (A) Potentiation of the 10 µM GABA-activated response by 1 µM Xenovulene A (X-A) in oocytes expressing alpha 1beta 1gamma 2S GABAA receptors was significantly compromised in the presence of the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil (FLZ: 5 µM). (B) Exclusion of the gamma 2S subunit by the expression of alpha 1beta 1 constructs resulted in a loss of activity for Xenovulene A (1 µM).

To investigate the selectivity of Xenovulene A and XR7009 as potential agonists at the benzodiazepine recognition site (i.e., type I-III pharmacology), recombinant GABAA receptors were expressed in oocytes with different alpha  subunits. Responses to GABA mediated by receptors composed of alpha 3beta 1gamma 2S were enhanced by Xenovulene A and XR7009, resulting in displaced concentration-response curves and lower EC50 values (fig. 6). For the control GABA curve, the EC50 was 104 ± 11 µM (n = 6) for alpha 3beta 1gamma 2S receptors, representing a 10-fold decrease in potency when compared with the GABA EC50 for alpha 1beta 1gamma 2S receptors. In the presence of Xenovulene A or XR7009, the EC50 was reduced to 45 ± 4 µM (n = 3) and 64 ± 6 µM (n = 3), respectively. Interestingly, for alpha 3beta 1gamma 2S receptors, the relative potentiation of GABA-activated responses (between EC20 and EC80) was greater for Xenovulene A than XR7009, which is in contrast to the order obtained for alpha 1beta 1gamma 2S receptors, where XR7009 was the more potent moiety in terms of the displacement of the concentration-response curve (figs. 3B and 6).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   GABAA receptor subtype selectivity exhibited by Xenovulene A and XR7009. Control equilibrium concentration-response curves for GABA (bullet ), and in the presence of either 1 µM Xenovulene A (open circle ) or XR7009 (triangle ) derived from cells expressing alpha 3beta 1gamma 2S or alpha 6beta 1gamma 2S GABAA receptors. A leftward displacement of the control curve was observed for these ligands with alpha 3 subunit-containing receptor constructs. The GABA concentration-response relationship for alpha 6 subunit-containing, diazepam-insensitive, GABAA receptors was not enhanced by Xenovulene A. Curves are normalized with respect to the response evoked by 100 µM (alpha 3beta 1gamma 2S) or 1 µM (alpha 6beta 1gamma 2S) GABA. Points represent means ± S.E.M. of data from three to six cells.

Although Xenovulene A and XR7009 both induced leftward displacements in the GABA concentration-response curves with corresponding reductions in the GABA EC50 values for both alpha 1 and alpha 3 subunit-containing receptors, these compounds exhibited some degree of receptor subtype selectivity. The percentage enhancements of the responses to GABA (EC20 concentrations) were significantly larger for alpha 1 compared with alpha 3 subunit-containing receptors (table 2). Selectivity was also evident when expressing alpha 6beta 1gamma 2S receptor subunits. GABA-activated responses for these "diazepam-insensitive receptors" were unaffected by either Xenovulene A (fig. 6) or XR7009 (not shown), but could be enhanced by 30 to 40% by the agent classified from radioligand binding studies as a partial inverse agonist, Ro15-4513 (200 nM), and previously demonstrated to interact with alpha 6 subunit-containing receptors.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
Potentiation of the GABA EC20 response for alpha-1 subunit- and alpha-3 subunit-containing GABAA receptors in the presence of Xenovulene A and XR7009

Measurements taken directly from the equilibrium concentration-response curves in figures 3 and 6 for the enhancement of the GABA EC20 value by Xenovulene A (1 µM) or XR7009 (1 µM) reveal the selectivity exhibited for the alpha 1beta 1gamma 2S GABAA receptor.

To establish that Xenovulene A also regulated the function of native neuronal GABAA receptors, GABA-activated responses were recorded from cultured cortical and sympathetic neurons. Whole-cell recording of GABA-activated currents revealed that Xenovulene A or XR7009 (1 µM) enhanced the current amplitudes (fig. 7). This effect could be prevented by prior incubation with flumazenil (1 µM).


View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Regulation of GABA-activated responses of cortical neurons by Xenovulene A. Traces represent whole-cell membrane currents recorded from cultured cortical neurons after application of 5 µM GABA in the presence and absence of 1 µM Xenovulene A (X-A). The positive modulatory effect of co-applied Xenovulene A was fully reversible.

The preincubation time required for Xenovulene A-induced enhancement of GABA-activated responses to attain a steady state was assessed by the rapid application of GABA to recombinant alpha 1beta 1gamma 2L subunit-containing GABAA receptors transiently expressed in human embryonic kidney cells. This revealed that the preincubation time required for a steady-state enhancement was approximately 30 s (fig. 8A). Moreover, by varying the preincubation times of Xenovulene A, the relationship of the enhanced GABA-activated response could be described by a single exponential function with a time constant of 5.8 ± 0.8 s (n = 3; fig. 8B).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Steady-state enhancement of the GABA-induced response by Xenovulene A. (A) Traces represent whole-cell membrane currents recorded from a single human embryonic kidney cell transiently expressing alpha 1beta 1gamma 2L GABAA receptors after the rapid application of 10 µM GABA in the absence, or presence (after preincubation for 5, 15 or 30 s) of Xenovulene A (X-A: 1 µM). The positive modulatory effect of Xenovulene A was fully reversible. (B) The percentage enhancement of the 10 µM GABA-activated response (IGABA) after various pre-exposure times with 1 µM Xenovulene A was adequately described by a single exponential curve. The time constant was 5.8 ± 0.8 s (n = 3). A steady state enhancement was attained in approximately 15 to 20 s.

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Benzodiazepines and the GABAA receptor. The usefulness of the benzodiazepines as therapeutic agents, particularly in treating anxiety, has been compromised by several well-known side effects ranging from ataxia, sedation and amnesia to the chronic problems associated with benzodiazepine addiction. Two approaches have been adopted to obviate some of the side effects and to improve the therapeutic potential of anxiolytic benzodiazepines. The first has targeted the synthesis of numerous agents, derived with the purpose of improving therapeutic selectivity. Secondly, the realization of potential GABAA receptor heterogeneity, following studies with recombinant GABAA receptors, offers the prospect that novel benzodiazepines, targeting receptors comprising specific subunit constructs, may possess unique therapeutic profiles perhaps devoid of many of the deleterious side effects. In particular, agents that can distinguish Type II over Type I benzodiazepine receptors would be of considerable interest, particularly because the behavioral profile of such ligands is currently unresolved. An alternative approach to these strategies, which we have adopted, involves the isolation of novel compounds from natural sources, unrelated to the benzodiazepine class of ligands, that are identified by radioligand binding to be potential ligands for the benzodiazepine binding site(s).

Allosteric modulation of the GABAA receptor by Xenovulene A: Type I vs. Type II pharmacology. The displacement of [3H]flunitrazepam binding from rat brain membranes coupled with the electrophysiological observations of enhanced GABA-mediated currents, all indicated that the metabolite, Xenovulene A, and the synthetic derivative, XR7009, bind to the GABAA receptor. The ability of flumazenil to inhibit the enhancement of the GABA-induced current by Xenovulene A and XR7009, and the dependence of the potentiation by these agents on the presence of the gamma 2 subunit in recombinant GABAA receptors, is in accordance with Xenovlene A and XR7009 binding to the benzodiazepine recognition site. In comparison with classical benzodiazepines (e.g., diazepam and flurazepam), XR7009 was more potent in enhancing GABA-mediated responses, whilst the parent molecule, Xenovulene A, was less potent than diazepam; however, both compounds behaved as full agonists at the benzodiazepine receptor, achieving similar maximal responses.

The degree of receptor selectivity exhibited by Xenovulene A and XR7009 was evident from the radioligand binding studies. Zolpidem, a classical Type I benzodiazepine ligand, displaced [3H]flunitrazepam binding in rat forebrain membranes exhibiting both high (presumed Type I) and low (presumed Type II) affinity binding. Both Xenovulene A and XR7009 exhibited similar profiles with high and low affinity binding, which suggests approximately equal proportions of Type I and II benzodiazepine receptors. In spinal cord membranes, zolpidem, Xenovulene A and XR7009 resolved only a single, low affinity site, which indicated binding to Type II receptors. Moreover, in the cerebellum, single high affinity binding sites were also uncovered for zolpidem, Xenovulene A and XR7009. It is therefore apparent that the parent natural product, Xenovulene A, and its analog, appear to select for Type I receptors over Type II, displaying a binding profile similar to zolpidem.

The prospect of Xenovulene A and XR7009 acting as subtype-selective agents was equivocally demonstrated with recombinant GABAA receptors. GABA-mediated responses recorded from alpha 1 subunit-containing oocytes were enhanced to greater extents than currents recorded from alpha 3 subunit-containing receptors. In addition, Xenovulene A and XR7009 were ineffective at enhancing responses to GABA on alpha 6 subunit-containing receptors (Type III). Presumably the binding of Xenovulene A and XR7009 to cerebellar membranes occurs with alpha 1 and not alpha 6 subunit-containing receptors. This was supported by the observation of Xenovulene A displacing the binding of the partial inverse agonist, [3H]Ro 15-4513, only from diazepam-sensitive sites (alpha 1 subunit-containing receptors), whereas diazepam-insensitive sites (alpha 6 subunit-containing receptors) were unaffected.

Comparison with other novel ligands at the benzodiazepine binding site. Apart from the benzodiazepines, there are other ligands that appear to fulfill the structural requirements necessary to interact at the allosteric benzodiazepine binding site on the GABAA receptor. The most notable of these is beta -lumicolchicine, an inactive analog of the microtubule-disrupting agent, colchicine, which like our compounds also bears little structural resemblance to the benzodiazepines. beta -Lumicolchicine enhanced muscimol-mediated Cl- uptake in cortical microsacs and inhibited the binding of [3H]flunitrazepam binding (Mihic et al., 1994). With human recombinant GABAA receptors comprising alpha 1beta 2gamma 2S subunits, beta -lumicolchicine enhanced GABA-activated currents. An interaction at the benzodiazepine binding site was indicated by the inhibition of modulation with flumazenil and the inability of beta -lumicolchicine to enhance responses mediated by alpha 1beta 2 subunits (Mihic et al., 1994). Interestingly, as for Xenovulene A, beta -lumicolchicine was less active on Type II GABAA receptors (alpha 2beta 2gamma 2S), which suggests some degree of subtype selectivity.

Structure-function relationship for Xenovulene A. The structures of the A. strictum metabolites have little resemblance to the structures of the classical benzodiazepines (fig. 1). To understand the details of the benzodiazepine pharmacophore, we attempted some preliminary structural modifications to Xenovulene A to identify those parts of the structures that are important for their functional properties at the GABAA receptor, and to identify those which bestow subtype-selective characteristics. A range of semisynthetic derivatives were prepared and characterized. Modifications included: the removal of one or both of the humulene ring double bonds, blocking the enolized alpha -dicarbonyl group, complete reduction of the molecules to the corresponding diols and the selective reduction of the tricycle with retention of the humulene ring double bonds. With the exception of XR7009 (produced by epoxidation of the C11-C12 double bond in the humulene ring of Xenovulene A), removal or chemically blocking any of these structural features resulted in a substantial loss of activity in radioligand displacement binding and functional electrophysiological assays. In particular, the rigidity of the humulene ring appears to be essential for activity at the GABAA-benzodiazepine receptor. Interestingly, the diol analogs exhibited increased stability, a feature absent from the parent compounds. Despite these substantial structural modifications, we were unable to change the selectivity of the molecule such that it became a Type II preferring benzodiazepine receptor ligand. Xenovulene A and XR7009 therefore remain novel and fascinating templates for the design of new potentially subtype-selective ligands for the benzodiazepine receptor.

    Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 17, 1997.

Received for publication November 26, 1996.

Send reprint requests to: Professor T.G. Smart, Department of Pharmacology, The School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK.

    Abbreviations

GABAA, gamma -aminobutyric acid receptor (type A); CNS, central nervous system; MBM, modified Barth's medium; MEM, minimum essential medium; beta -CCE, beta -carboline-3-carboxylate; FLZ, flunitrazepam; HEPES, N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid.

    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References


0022-3565/97/2822-0513$03.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, P.
Right arrow Articles by Smart, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, P.
Right arrow Articles by Smart, T. G.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition