![]() |
|
|
Vol. 282, Issue 1, 7-13, 1997
Denver Veterans Administration Medical Center (J.L., S.L.) and Department of Psychiatry (C.R.B., C.E.A., B.S., S.L.), University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado and Institute for Behavioral Genetics, Department of Psychology (M.J.M., A.C.C.), University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chronic nicotine administration in animal models evokes a dose-dependent increase in brain nicotinic receptor numbers. Genetically determined variability in nicotinic receptor number in different mouse strains has also been reported, which is thought to affect sensitivity to nicotine, as well as the development of tolerance. Humans self-administer nicotine principally in the form of cigarettes and other tobacco products. The present study compared [3H]nicotine binding in human postmortem brain from thalamus and hippocampus of nonsmoking subjects, subjects who had variable life-long smoking histories and subjects who had quit smoking. A significant increase was seen in [3H]nicotine binding in both hippocampus and thalamus of subjects with life-long smoking histories. In the hippocampus, this change resulted from a change in total receptor number (Bmax), with no change in receptor affinity (Kd). There was also a positive correlation between the degree of smoking, as measured by the average reported packs smoked per day, and the number of nicotine binding sites found in both the hippocampus and thalamus, showing that humans exhibit a dose-dependent increase in brain nicotinic receptor binding. Receptor levels in these brain regions after smoking cessation were at or below those found in the control population, which indicated that smoking-induced changes are reversible after cessation of nicotine treatment. These results suggest that increases in nicotinic receptor levels in the human brain may underlie nicotine tolerance and addiction in smokers.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chronic treatment with agonists
for most neurotransmitter receptor systems results in a decrease in
receptor number (Creese and Sibley, 1981
). However, it has been
demonstrated that chronic nicotine treatment in mice (Bhat et
al., 1991
; Collins et al., 1989
; Marks et
al., 1983
, 1985
, 1986a
, 1989a
; Wonnacott, 1990
) and rats (Flores
et al., 1992
; Ksir et al., 1987
; Nordberg
et al., 1989
; Schwartz and Kellar, 1983
, 1985
) will elicit a
dose-dependent increase in brain [3H]nicotine and
[125I]
BTX binding sites (Marks et al.,
1983
, 1986b
). High-affinity nicotine binding is up-regulated at a lower
dose than that required to elicit changes in the
[125I]
BTX site; however, at an adequate dose, the
number of [125I]
BTX sites increases more rapidly
(Miner and Collins, 1989
). The up-regulation of
[3H]nicotine binding is not permanent, with binding
levels returning to control values within 7 to 10 days in mouse (Marks
et al., 1985
) and in 15 to 20 days in rat (Collins et
al., 1990
) after cessation of nicotine treatment. The levels of
[125I]
BTX binding return to control levels within 2 to
4 days after nicotine treatment is discontinued in both rat and mouse
(Collins et al., 1990
; Miner and Collins, 1989
).
A genetically determined variability in the number of brain nicotinic
receptors has been reported in mice (Collins and Marks, 1989
, 1991
;
Marks et al., 1989a
). Analysis of nicotinic receptor binding
in regionally dissected brain samples obtained from 19 different inbred
mouse strains demonstrated that the number of both
[3H]nicotine and [125I]
BTX binding sites
varied among the various mouse strains (Marks et al.,
1989a
). The variation in receptor density was significantly correlated
with differences among the strains in response to an acute challenge of
nicotine (Marks et al., 1989b
), and could reflect differences in the development of tolerance to chronic nicotine treatment.
A genetic component may also exist for the sensitivity and tolerance of
humans to cigarette smoking (Collins, 1990a
). Studies of monozygotic
and dizygotic twins, discordant for smoking, suggest that there is a
strong genetic component in humans for both initiation and persistence
of smoking. The concordance rate for smoking was higher among
monozygotic twins than it was among dizygotic twins (Carmelli et
al., 1992
). There also appears to be a genetic effect on smoking
persistence, because monozygotic twins were more likely to be
concordant for smoking cessation (Heath and Martin, 1993
; Heath
et al., 1993
, 1995
).
In contrast to what is known about the regulation of neuronal nicotinic
receptor levels in rodents, regulation of the nicotinic receptor family
is poorly understood in human brain. Although it has been reported that
human tobacco users may show an increase in brain
[3H]nicotine binding (Benwell et al., 1988
),
it is unknown whether receptor number increases with extent and
persistence of smoking, or if binding returns to control levels when a
person ceases to smoke. In the present study, the levels of
[3H]nicotine binding were examined in human postmortem
hippocampus and thalamus for changes in nicotinic receptor levels in
relation to smoking history. To examine the regulatory effect and the
dose dependency of tobacco use on nicotinic receptor numbers in humans, nicotine binding was examined in tissue samples from nonsmoking subjects, subjects who had variable life-long smoking histories and
subjects who had quit smoking.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human postmortem brain collection and storage.
Human brains
were collected at autopsy. Hospital and autopsy records were reviewed
to determine age, sex, race, cause of death, mental illness, cigarette,
alcohol and drug use. Family members and physicians were also
interviewed to detail the smoking history of the subject. After the
brain was weighed and examined for gross pathology, it was divided
sagittally and one hemisphere was preserved in formalin for
neuropathological analysis. The other hemisphere was sliced coronally
into 1-cm slices, and regions of interest were dissected in
approximately 1-g blocks, frozen in dry ice snow and packaged for
storage at
75oC (Leonard et al., 1993
). The
patient histories and tissue characteristics, including mental health
status and alcohol abuse, smoking history, age of the patient, cause of
death, postmortem interval and storage time are listed in table
1. Subjects included in this study had no history of
chronic psychotic disorders. Binding studies were performed in two
separate experiments. The initial experiment included only hippocampal
tissue (n = 9) on which Scatchard analyses were
performed. The second experiment included both hippocampus (n = 32, total n = 41) and thalamic
tissue (n = 32), on which single-point determinations
of nicotine binding were performed. Of these subjects, 11 where
nonsmokers, 21 were life-long smokers and 9 subjects were smokers who
had quit at least 2 months before death.
|
Tissue preparation.
Dissected regions of human postmortem
hippocampus and thalamus were weighed and homogenized in 10 volumes of
ice-cold Krebs-Ringer HEPES buffer (118 mM NaCl, 4.8 mM KCl, 2.5 mM
CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5) in a
Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer with a motor-driven Teflon pestle.
Membranes were prepared by the method of Romano and Goldstein (1980)
,
as described previously (Marks et al., 1983
). Three
additional centrifugation steps after resuspension and rehomogenization in 0.1× Krebs-Ringer HEPES were included to provide thorough washing of the membranes. After the final wash, pellets were resuspended in
0.1× Krebs-Ringer HEPES buffer (1 ml/g original wet weight), aliquoted, and assayed for protein content (BCA assay, Pierce, Rockford, IL). Membranes were stored at
75°C until analyzed for [3H]nicotine binding.
L-[3H]Nicotine
binding.
[3H]Nicotine binding
([N-methyl-3H]nicotine, specific activity 60.0 Ci/mmol;
Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, IL; repurified by the method of Romm
et al. (1990)
to reduce nonspecific binding of the labeled
ligand) was measured at 4°C by a modification of the method of Romano
and Goldstein (1980)
, as previously described (Marks et al.,
1986a
). The assay was modified to allow filtration of samples in an
Inotech filtration apparatus (Inotech Biosystems, Lansing, MI).
Incubations were conducted in an incubation volume of 100 µl in
96-well polystyrene culture dishes. Samples containing 100 to 200 µg
of protein were incubated at 4°C for 90 min in Krebs-Ringer HEPES
containing 200 mM Tris. The binding reaction was terminated by
filtration in an Inotech apparatus equipped with a 96-well head. Two
glass fiber filters [top filter: GB100 (Micro Filtration Systems,
Dublin, CA); bottom filter: Type A/E (Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor,
MI)], previously soaked in buffer containing 0.5% polyethylenimine, were used to trap protein. The use of two filters provided results that
did not differ from those obtained using Millipore filter flasks with
#30 glass fiber filters (Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, NH). Blanks
were established by including 10 µM unlabeled nicotine in the
incubation. Single-point assays were done at a
[3H]nicotine concentration of 5 nM. Total binding was
analyzed in triplicate and nonspecific binding in duplicate. In
selected hippocampal samples, saturation curves were constructed by use
of six concentrations of [3H]nicotine (1-29 nM) to
determine whether smoking history affected the receptor affinity for
nicotine. After filtration of the samples, the glass fiber filters were
placed in polypropylene vials with 2.5 ml of scintillation fluid
(Budget Solve, Research Products International, Mt. Prospect, IL), the
filters mixed by shaking for 30-60 min and radioactivity determined
(Packard 1600CA Liquid Scintillation Spectrometer; counting efficiency,
53%).
Data analysis.
Specific binding was calculated (fmoles/mg
protein) and the data were analyzed by comparing the nicotine levels in
adult nonsmokers, smokers up to the time of death and smokers who had
quit at least 2 months before death. All data were statistically
analyzed by ANOVA (Crunch statistical software, Oakland, CA) followed
by ad hoc specific contrasts to identify the source of the
variance (Scheff 233 test for multiple comparisons; Keppel, 1982
).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Postmortem brain tissue samples.
Patient histories and tissue
characteristics, including mental health status, alcohol abuse, age of
patient, cause of death, postmortem interval and storage time are
listed in table 1, grouped by smoking history. The means and standard
errors for each category are listed for each of the groups.
Neuropathological analysis revealed that tissue samples used in this
study were free of any neuropathological disorders. No statistical
difference (all P > .15) was found among the three experimental
groups compared for age of the subjects at death (average age,
55.8 ± 2.4 years; P = .43), postmortem interval (average
PMI, 14.1 ± 1.1 hours; P = .24) or tissue storage (average
time in storage, 859 ± 74 days; P = .23). In addition, no
significant correlations were found between any of these parameters and
[3H]nicotine binding (fig. 1; all P > .05). On average, smokers who had quit smoked fewer packs per day
than those subjects with life-long smoking histories (smokers,
1.62 ± 0.16 packs/day; smokers who quit, 0.87 ± 0.15 packs/day, P < .009).
|
L-[3H]Nicotine
binding.
Results and group means of single-point
[3H]nicotine binding data ([3H]nicotine
concentration of 5 nM) for both the hippocampus and thalamus are listed
in table 1. Scatchard analyses were performed with a selected number of
subjects in hippocampal tissue (n = 9), and results for
three subjects with different smoking histories are shown in figure
2. The inset graph shows data for sample SL010, a
moderate smoker, which indicate that [3H]nicotine binding
was saturable in human postmortem brain. Regression analysis of the
data for these subjects fit a straight line, consistent with that
expected for a single binding site that uses repurified [3H]nicotine (Romm et al., 1990
). As shown in
figure 2, there was an increase in the Bmax for
[3H]nicotine binding with increasing degree of smoking
(figure 2; SL007, heavy smoker, Bmax = 5.5 fmol/mg protein; SL010, moderate smoker, Bmax = 26.8 fmol/mg protein; SB154, nonsmoker, Bmax = 46 fmol/mg protein). Parallelism of the lines shows that the slopes are
nearly identical, which indicates that smoking history did not
correlate with any change in the affinity of nicotine for its receptor
in hippocampus. The mean Kd, which included
members from nonsmokers, smokers and smokers who had quit, was
2.79 ± 0.19. (Individual data are listed in the legend of fig. 2;
group means: nonsmoker, 2.4; smokers, 2.58 ± 0.08; smokers who
quit, 3.27 ± 0.48). No difference was found in receptor affinity
(Kd) between these groups (F(1,6) = 3.46, P = .11), or in the correlation between receptor affinity
and the number of packs smoked per day at the time of death
(r =
0.38, P = .31). Although binding affinity was not specifically examined in thalamic tissue, previous results in
mice (Marks et al., 1985
, 1989a
) and human postmortem brain (Benwell et al., 1988
) have shown that the receptor affinity
for nicotine was similar throughout the brain and was not changed as a
result of nicotine treatment or smoking history.
|
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies in rodents have shown that chronic nicotine
treatment induces an increase in high-affinity nicotinic receptor binding, which persists for up to 20 days after treatment is suspended (Collins et al., 1990
; Marks et al., 1985
). It
has also been shown that a similar increase in
[3H]nicotine binding to high-affinity receptors occurs in
human postmortem cortex, cerebellum and hippocampus of smokers, when compared to non-smokers (Benwell et al., 1988
). The present
study examined the effects of both nicotine intake and smoking
cessation on the high-affinity nicotinic receptors in human postmortem
hippocampus and thalamus. Nicotine binding was increased in the
hippocampi of smokers, as well as in the thalamus, a brain region with
high [3H]nicotine binding levels (Clarke et
al., 1985
; Rubboli et al., 1994
). In the hippocampus,
the changes in nicotinic receptor binding resulted from a change in
total receptor numbers (Bmax) and not from a
change in receptor affinity (Kd) (Benwell
et al., 1988
; Marks et al., 1985
, 1989a
). There
was no apparent effect of age on receptor numbers, nor a significant
change in receptor numbers as a result of tissue handling parameters
such as PMI or storage time, which suggests that nicotinic receptors
are relatively stable under the conditions used in our assay system
(Benwell and Balfour, 1985
). Nicotinic receptor numbers were also found
to be positively correlated with the level of nicotine intake, defined
as the number of cigarettes smoked per day. Smokers who had quit
smoking at least 2 months before death had levels of
[3H]nicotine binding which were comparable to levels
found in nonsmoking subjects.
The effect of the degree of smoking and daily nicotine intake on the level of [3H]nicotine binding was examined by comparing two measures of smoking with nicotinic receptor levels. Packs smoked per day was used as a measure to examine the influences of nicotine dose dependency, and pack years was used to examine the effect of the overall amount smoked during the subject's lifetime. Although [3H]nicotine binding levels increased with smoking history in both brain regions, use of the number of packs smoked per day for the correlational analysis provided a more robust effect than did pack years. This would indicate that the increase in [3H]nicotine binding levels in humans was dose-dependent and most affected by the daily nicotine intake before death, rather than the overall amount smoked during a lifetime. In addition, it was found that only subjects that smoked had a significant correlation between the [3H]nicotine binding in hippocampus and thalamus. This confirms the dependence of nicotine intake on the observed increases in [3H]nicotine binding levels in smokers and suggests that the regulatory mechanisms that increase nicotinic receptor numbers in smokers may be similar in both of these tissues.
Although several studies have examined the effect of chronic and acute
nicotine exposure in rodents, the exact nature of the increase in
nicotine binding has yet to be fully understood. The
4/
2
containing receptors have been reported to account for >90% of the
nicotinic receptors in rat brain (Lindstrom et al., 1990
; Whiting and Lindstrom, 1987
), and western blotting has shown that the
increase in nicotinic receptors in rats was caused by an increased expression of the
4/
2 containing receptors, although other
receptor subtypes were not examined (Flores et al., 1992
).
It has been shown in various strains of mice that nicotine-induced
increases in nicotinic receptor numbers do not increase to the same
degree in all brain regions, or even within a brain region (Collins
et al., 1989
; Marks et al., 1992
). For example,
mouse thalamus was one brain area that showed regional variations in
the nicotine-induced increases in [3H]nicotine binding,
whereas hippocampal [3H]nicotine binding was consistently
increased throughout the structure (Collins et al., 1989
;
Marks et al., 1992
). Heterogeneous up-regulation of
nicotinic receptor expression within human thalamus may account for the
reduced correlation of smoking with [3H]nicotine binding,
when compared with that in human hippocampus. A detailed
autoradiographic analysis of [3H]nicotine binding will be
required to examine regional variations in human brain.
The increase in nicotinic receptor numbers in rodents is not caused by
an increase in mRNA levels (Marks et al., 1992
). Whether this is true in human brain remains to be determined. However, the lack
of an effect on nicotinic receptor transcription in mice suggests that
nicotine-induced increases in nicotinic receptor levels could result
from changes in post-translational processing, or as shown in tissue
culture, a decrease in receptor turnover (Peng et al.,
1994
). It has been hypothesized that the increase in nicotinic receptor
number and the decreased rate of receptor turnover may be related to
nicotinic receptor channel desensitization, which appears to reflect
the conformational state of the receptor channel (Marks et
al., 1983
; Peng et al., 1994
; Schwartz and Keller, 1985). Once the nicotinic receptor channels are desensitized and rendered inactive, additional receptors would be recruited to maintain
the nicotinic response of the neuron, which results in an overall
increase in nicotine binding (Bencherif et al., 1995
).
It is interesting to note that smokers who had quit at least 2 months
before death had nicotinic receptor binding levels that were similar to
those found in nonsmokers. This suggests that nicotine-induced
up-regulation of receptor numbers is a temporary effect, similar to
that found in rodents (Collins et al., 1990
; Marks et
al., 1985
). It is also possible that these subjects may have had a
lower basal nicotinic receptor level before smoking initiation. Such
individuals might be less sensitive to the rewarding effects of
nicotine and would, therefore, be less likely to persist in a smoking
behavior than a person with higher nicotinic receptor levels (Eysenck,
1983
; Collins, 1990a
). Conversely, it could be speculated that humans,
who continue to smoke after initial experimentation with cigarette use,
might have had either a higher basal nicotinic receptor level or an
increase in the rate of the observed nicotinic receptor up-regulation.
In either case, these subjects would be more sensitive to the rewarding
effects of nicotine, and more likely to persist in smoking behaviors
(Collins, 1990b
). This hypothesis suggests an underlying heterogeneity
in expression of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor family in human
brain, which is supported by the observed variability in
[3H]nicotine binding levels within the various groups
examined in these studies (see fig. 3). Regional variations in basal
nicotinic receptor levels in mouse brain have also been reported among
different mouse strains (Marks et al., 1989a
).
Several studies in laboratory animals suggest that genetic factors may
be involved in regulating both neuronal nicotinic receptor expression
and behavioral and physiological response to nicotine (Collins et
al., 1989
). Epidemiological studies of smoking history in humans
also supports the involvement of a genetic component in the propensity
for nicotine sensitivity, use and withdrawal (Carmelli et
al., 1992
; Collins, 1990a
; Heath and Martin, 1993
; Health et
al., 1993). Continued use of tobacco products in humans results in
nicotine tolerance (Collins, 1990b
). The dose-dependent increase in
nicotinic receptor numbers in human subjects that persists in smokers
may, at least in part, influence the development of nicotine tolerance
and addiction. Studies are currently underway to examine the effect of
smoking history on the mRNA levels for specific nicotinic receptor
subunits to investigate the mechanism involved in nicotinic receptor
up-regulation in humans.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication March 6, 1997.
Received for publication October 15, 1996.
1 This work was supported by USPHS Grants, DA09457 and VA Medical Research Service to S.L., DA03194 and DA00197 to A.C.C. and AA11164 to C.R.B.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Sherry Leonard, Department of Psychiatry, Box C268-71, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 E. 9th Avenue, Denver, CO 80262.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
BTX,
-bungarotoxin;
HEPES, N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N
-2-ethanesulfonic acid;
PMI, postmortem
interval.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
)-[3H]nicotine binding sites in human brain.
J. Neurochem.
50: 1243-1247, 1988[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. G. Mukhin, A. S. Kimes, S. I. Chefer, J. A. Matochik, C. S. Contoreggi, A. G. Horti, D. B. Vaupel, O. Pavlova, and E. A. Stein Greater Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Density in Smokers Than in Nonsmokers: A PET Study with 2-18F-FA-85380 J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 1628 - 1635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mamede, K. Ishizu, M. Ueda, T. Mukai, Y. Iida, H. Kawashima, H. Fukuyama, K. Togashi, and H. Saji Temporal Change in Human Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor After Smoking Cessation: 5IA SPECT Study J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1829 - 1835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. T. Hope, D. Nagarkar, S. Leonard, and R. A. Wise Long-Term Upregulation of Protein Kinase A and Adenylate Cyclase Levels in Human Smokers J. Neurosci., February 21, 2007; 27(8): 1964 - 1972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Wada, M. Naito, H. Kenmochi, H. Tsuneki, and T. Sasaoka Chronic Nicotine Exposure Enhances Insulin-Induced Mitogenic Signaling via Up-Regulation of {alpha}7 Nicotinic Receptors in Isolated Rat Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells Endocrinology, February 1, 2007; 148(2): 790 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Staley, S. Krishnan-Sarin, K. P. Cosgrove, E. Krantzler, E. Frohlich, E. Perry, J. A. Dubin, K. Estok, E. Brenner, R. M. Baldwin, et al. Human Tobacco Smokers in Early Abstinence Have Higher Levels of beta2* Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors than Nonsmokers. J. Neurosci., August 23, 2006; 26(34): 8707 - 8714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Brody, M. A. Mandelkern, E. D. London, R. E. Olmstead, J. Farahi, D. Scheibal, J. Jou, V. Allen, E. Tiongson, S. I. Chefer, et al. Cigarette Smoking Saturates Brain {alpha}4beta2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors. Arch Gen Psychiatry, August 1, 2006; 63(8): 907 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Alkondon and E. X. Albuquerque Nicotinic Receptor Subtypes in Rat Hippocampal Slices Are Differentially Sensitive to Desensitization and Early in Vivo Functional Up-Regulation by Nicotine and to Block by Bupropion J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2005; 313(2): 740 - 750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Roman, J. D. Ritzenthaler, R. Bechara, L. A. Brown, and D. Guidot Ethanol stimulates the expression of fibronectin in lung fibroblasts via kinase-dependent signals that activate CREB Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): L975 - L987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hukkanen, P. Jacob III, and N. L. Benowitz Metabolism and Disposition Kinetics of Nicotine Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2005; 57(1): 79 - 115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Sacco, K. L. Bannon, and T. P. George Nicotinic receptor mechanisms and cognition in normal states and neuropsychiatric disorders J Psychopharmacol, December 1, 2004; 18(4): 457 - 474. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z.-G. Huang, X. Wang, C. Evans, A. Gold, E. Bouairi, and D. Mendelowitz Prenatal Nicotine Exposure Alters the Types of Nicotinic Receptors That Facilitate Excitatory Inputs to Cardiac Vagal Neurons J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2548 - 2554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bibevski and M. E. Dunlap Prevention of diminished parasympathetic control of the heart in experimental heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): H1780 - H1785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Y. Lopez-Hernandez, J. Sanchez-Padilla, A. Ortiz-Acevedo, J. Lizardi-Ortiz, J. Salas-Vincenty, L. V. Rojas, and J. A. Lasalde-Dominicci Nicotine-induced Up-regulation and Desensitization of {alpha}4{beta}2 Neuronal Nicotinic Receptors Depend on Subunit Ratio J. Biol. Chem., September 3, 2004; 279(36): 38007 - 38015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mamede, K. Ishizu, M. Ueda, T. Mukai, Y. Iida, H. Fukuyama, T. Saga, and H. Saji Quantification of Human Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors with 123I-5IA SPECT J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1458 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Orb, J. Wieacker, C. Labarca, C. Fonck, H. A. Lester, and J. Schwarz Knockin mice with Leu9'Ser {alpha}4-nicotinic receptors: substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons are hypersensitive to agonist and lost postnatally Physiol Genomics, August 11, 2004; 18(3): 299 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nashmi, M. E. Dickinson, S. McKinney, M. Jareb, C. Labarca, S. E. Fraser, and H. A. Lester Assembly of {alpha}4{beta}2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Assessed with Functional Fluorescently Labeled Subunits: Effects of Localization, Trafficking, and Nicotine-Induced Upregulation in Clonal Mammalian Cells and in Cultured Midbrain Neurons J. Neurosci., December 17, 2003; 23(37): 11554 - 11567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. N. Nguyen, B. A. Rasmussen, and D. C. Perry Subtype-Selective Up-Regulation by Chronic Nicotine of High-Affinity Nicotinic Receptors in Rat Brain Demonstrated by Receptor Autoradiography J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2003; 307(3): 1090 - 1097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Avila, M. I. Davila-Garcia, V. S. Ascarrunz, Y. Xiao, and K. J. Kellar Differential Regulation of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in PC12 Cells by Nicotine and Nerve Growth Factor Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2003; 64(4): 974 - 986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zhao, Y.-P. Kuo, A. A. George, J.-H. Peng, M. S. Purandare, K. M. Schroeder, R. J. Lukas, and J. Wu Functional Properties of Homomeric, Human {alpha}7-Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Heterologously Expressed in the SH-EP1 Human Epithelial Cell Line J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2003; 305(3): 1132 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Rose, F. M. Behm, E. C. Westman, R. J. Mathew, E. D. London, T. C. Hawk, T. G. Turkington, and R. E. Coleman PET Studies of the Influences of Nicotine on Neural Systems in Cigarette Smokers Am J Psychiatry, February 1, 2003; 160(2): 323 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Partridge, S. Apparsundaram, G. A. Gerhardt, J. Ronesi, and D. M. Lovinger Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Interact with Dopamine in Induction of Striatal Long-Term Depression J. Neurosci., April 1, 2002; 22(7): 2541 - 2549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Girod and L. W. Role Long-Lasting Enhancement of Glutamatergic Synaptic Transmission by Acetylcholine Contrasts with Response Adaptation after Exposure to Low-Level Nicotine J. Neurosci., July 15, 2001; 21(14): 5182 - 5190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||