JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bustamante, D.
Right arrow Articles by Le Bars, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bustamante, D.
Right arrow Articles by Le Bars, D.

Vol. 281, Issue 3, 1381-1391, 1997

Effects of Intrathecal or Intracerebroventricular Administration of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs on a C-Fiber Reflex in Rats1

Diego Bustamante, Carlos Paeile, Jean-Claude Willer and Daniel Le Bars

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile (D.B., C.P.), Laboratoire de Neurophysiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétriêre, Paris, France (J.-C.W.), and INSERM U161, Paris, France (D.L.B.)


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

A C-fiber reflex elicited by electrical stimulation within the territory of the sural nerve was recorded from the ipsilateral biceps femoris muscle in anesthetized rats. The temporal evolution of the response was studied using a constant stimulus intensity (3 times threshold), and recruitment curves were built by varying the stimulus intensity from 0 to 7 times threshold. The intrathecal (i.t.) but not i.c.v. administration of aspirin, indomethacin, ketoprofen and lysine clonixinate resulted in dose-dependent depressions of the C-fiber reflex. In contrast, saline was ineffective. Regardless of the route of administration, the drugs never produced disturbances in heart rate and/or acid-base equilibrium. When a constant level of stimulation was used, 500 µg of aspirin i.t. induced a blockade of the reflex immediately after the injection, followed by a partial recovery. Indomethacin produced a stable depression, which reached 80 to 90% with an i.t. dose of 500 µg. Ketoprofen and lysine clonixinate produced a more stable effect; the highest doses (500 µg) produced a steady-state depression of approximately 50% for approximately 30 min. When the recruitment curves were built with a range of nociceptive stimulus intensities, all of the drugs except for indomethacin produced a dose-dependent decrease in the slopes and the areas under the recruitment curves without major modifications in the thresholds; indomethacin also induced a significant dose-related increase in the threshold. The orders of potency for both stimulation paradigms with the i.t. route were the same, namely aspirin > indomethacin > lysine clonixinate >=  ketoprofen. It is concluded that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs elicit significant antinociceptive effects at a spinal level, which do not depend on the existence of a hyperalgesic or inflammatory state. Such effects were not seen after injections within the lateral ventricle.


    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

In a previous paper, we reported the actions of various i.v. administered NSAIDs on a C-fiber reflex elicited by stimulation within the territory of the sural nerve and recorded electromyographically from the biceps femoris muscle (Bustamante et al., 1996a). This test does not produce inflammation at the site of nociceptive stimulation and was used to investigate central analgesic actions because the reflex response is elicited by direct stimulation of nerve terminals and fibers, thus bypassing all transduction processes at a peripheral level; it also allows the examination of responses to a wide range of stimulus intensities (Strimbu-Gozariu et al., 1993; Falinower et al., 1994; Guirimand et al., 1994). After i.v. administration, NSAIDs exhibited an ability to affect essentially reflexes elicited by suprathreshold stimuli. Although these effects were weak, they appeared in the absence of any "central facilitation," at least when nontoxic doses were used, as in our previous study. Indeed, with our experimental approach there were no inflammatory processes or ongoing sustained afferent barrages generated by irritant sustained stimuli. However, we had no way of knowing whether the drugs acted at a spinal level, a supraspinal level or both. We have used i.t. and i.c.v. applications of NSAIDs to examine the spinal and supraspinal components of the central effects that we previously observed after i.v. administration. For the present study, we chose a NSAID from each of four different families of drugs, namely salicylates (aspirin), indol-acetic acid derivatives (indomethacin), aryl-propionic acid derivatives (ketoprofen) and fenamates (lysine clonixinate). After i.t. administration, all of these drugs exhibited dose-related depressive effects on the responses to suprathreshold stimuli. This was not the case after i.c.v. administration. These results have been presented in abstract form (Bustamante et al., 1996b).

    Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

General procedure. The general procedure was essentially similar to that described previously (Strimbu-Gozariu et al., 1993; Falinower et al., 1994; Guirimand et al., 1994; Bustamante et al., 1996a).

Animal preparation. Experiments were carried out in male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 250 to 300 g. During the surgical procedure, the animals were deeply anesthetized with 2.5% halothane in a nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture (2:1). The surgical procedure consisted of a performing a tracheotomy, cannulating a jugular vein and inserting either a polyethylene catheter i.t. to the lumbar enlargement of the spinal cord or a needle into the lateral ventricle for the administration of drugs.

The method of i.t. injection was the same as that described by Yaksh and Rudy (1976), which permits delivery of small amounts of drug into the subarachnoid space. Basically, it consists of fixing the animals in a stereotaxic frame, with the head ventroflexed by means of a metal bar, and inserting a polyethylene (PE-10) catheter 8.5 cm down the spinal subarachnoid space through a slit in the cisternal dura and arachnoid membranes. The actual dorsal location of the i.t. catheter was checked after a laminectomy at the end of each experiment. When it was not located properly, i.e., dorsal to the lumbar enlargement, the results were disregarded. After they were prepared, the animals were removed from the head-holder and the experimental protocol was followed.

When i.c.v. injections were to be made, the rats were placed in a stereotaxic frame and a craniotomy was made over the lateral ventricle, with care being taken not to disturb the vessels. A microinjection needle was then placed stereotaxically at the following coordinates: anteroposterior, +29.6 mm; lateral, +4.8 mm; vertical, +30 mm (with zero corresponding to the interauricular axis). These animals were maintained in the head-holder during the electrophysiological and pharmacological procedures.

After surgery, the concentration of halothane was lowered to 0.9% in 100% oxygen. Throughout the experiments, the animals were artificially ventilated and the heart rate was monitored. Respiratory rate (50 counts/min), O2, end-tidal CO2 (3.2-3.5%) and halothane level (0.9%) were monitored continuously using a capnometer (Capnomac II; Datex Instruments, Helsinki, Finland). The measurements of CO2 and halothane were made by IR absorption and those of O2 with a fast paramagnetic analyzer. These parameters were displayed digitally, and each was controlled by an alarm. Body temperature was maintained at 37 ± 0.5°C by means of a homeothermic blanket system.

Electrophysiological recordings. This method has been described previously (Strimbu-Gozariu et al., 1993; Guirimand et al., 1994; Falinower et al., 1994). Electrophysiological recordings were made, in the ipsilateral biceps femoris muscle, of reflex activity evoked by electrical stimulation of the C-fibers within the receptive field of the sural nerve. A pair of noninsulated platinum-iridium needle electrodes were inserted s.c. into the medial part of the fourth and lateral part of the fifth toe. EMG responses were recorded via another pair of noninsulated platinum-iridium needles inserted through the skin into the biceps femoris muscle.

The electrical stimuli were single-square shocks of 2-msec duration and were delivered once every 6 sec (0.17 Hz) from a constant-current stimulator. The stimulus intensities and the EMG responses were fed to an oscilloscope for continuous monitoring and to a computerized system that digitized and recorded responses from 50 msec before until 450 msec after the stimulus onset. The digitized EMG responses were full-wave rectified, and the C-fiber evoked responses were integrated within a time-window from 100 to 450 msec after the stimulus. This procedure allowed a quantitative study of the reflex in its usual time-window without including the EMG base line between successive stimuli. The individual reflex responses were plotted either against time, to allow the study of their temporal evolution, or against stimulus intensity, to build recruitment curves. The integrals were expressed in millivolts·milliseconds and the current intensities in milliamperes. When the recruitment curves were investigated, the stimuli were applied at increasing intensities from 0 mA to 7 times threshold.

Control period characteristics. All individual experiments began with a control period in which the characteristics of the responses were determined; 20 to 30 min after the end of the surgical preparation and the decrease in the level of anesthesia to 0.9% halothane, the application of 15-mA stimuli to the sural nerve resulted in stable supramaximal reflex responses with minimal spontaneous fluctuations. This was the prerequisite finding before the pharmacological procedures were started. A control recruitment curve was built by increasing the intensity of the stimulus. Reflex responses increased monotonically and reached a plateau at high intensities. The threshold of the C-fiber evoked response was determined as the intersection of the polymodal regression curve and the abscissa. Thereafter, a constant level of stimulation (3 times threshold) was applied. During the first 10 min, the stability of EMG responses was checked. The mean of the 50 successive reflex responses (corresponding to a 5-min period) that immediately preceded the first injection was considered as the mean control value. The constant level of stimulation was applied for 30 min after i.t. or i.c.v. injections. A new recruitment curve was then established.

Pharmacological procedures. To determine the effect and the relative potencies of the i.t. administered NSAIDs on a C-fiber reflex, several doses of each one were used, as follows: aspirin, 10, 50, 100 and 500 µg; indomethacin, 100, 200, 300 and 500 µg; ketoprofen, 100, 200, 300 and 500 µg; lysine clonixinate, 100, 200, 300, 500 and 1000 µg. All drugs were dissolved in saline (0.9% NaCl) to give a total volume of 10 µl for administration. The drugs were injected using a 50-µl Hamilton syringe, at a constant rate, over a 60-sec period. Saline (10 µl) was used as a control.

The effects of i.c.v. NSAIDs on the C-fiber reflex were determined using only one dose for each drug, namely 500 µg of aspirin, 250 µg of indomethacin, 250 µg of ketoprofen and 500 µg of lysine clonixinate. The drugs were dissolved in saline to give a total volume of 5 µl for administration. The drugs were injected using a 20-µl Hamilton syringe, at a constant rate, over a 60-sec period. Again, saline was used as a control.

Only one dose of one drug was used in each rat. The rats were sacrificed with an overdose of pentobarbital at the end of the experiments.

Processing of data. To analyze the results of the constant-stimulation paradigm, the EMG responses were expressed as percentages of the mean control value and the final individual results were expressed as means of 10 successive responses (corresponding to 1 min of the procedure). A graph of the temporal evolution over a 30-min period was built to evaluate the drug action at the constant level of stimulation; this allowed the magnitude of the effects to be calculated as the AUC by means of a trapezoidal procedure. This was then expressed as a percentage effect (percentage of AUC), where 100% represented complete blockade of the C-fiber EMG signal during the 30-min period.

To analyze the results with the recruitment curve paradigm, each individual EMG response was expressed as a percentage of the maximal C-fiber control response. The stimulus intensities were expressed as multiples of the threshold calculated during the control period, with the maximal response generally occurring at an intensity of 7 times threshold. More than 15 intensity points were used for building each recruitment curve. However, to simplify the processing of data, only nine intensity points, namely those obtained at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 times threshold intensity, were considered. In cases where one of these intensities had not been applied during the experiment, the response was estimated by linear regression between the two nearest intensity points. Such interpolations never involved intensities greater than 2 mA. The AURC values from the control (AURCcontrol) and after-drug (AURCtreated) curves were calculated by a trapezoidal approximation for each animal, and the percentage effect (percentage of AURC) was expressed as
% AURC<IT>=</IT>[(AURC<SUB>control</SUB><IT>−</IT>AURC<SUB>treated</SUB>)/AUC<SUB>control</SUB>] × 100
The linear regression procedure used to extrapolate the threshold intensity allowed the calculation of the slope of each recruitment curve. Thus, the treated/control ratio for thresholds and slopes were also used to analyze the drug action.

Dose-response curves were determined as semilogarithmic plots to illustrate the effect of each drug on percentage of AUC and percentage of AURC. To compare the antinociceptive potencies of the i.t. administered drugs, ED50 values and their 95% confidence limits were calculated, using both experimental paradigms. The resulting slopes ± S.E.M. of the dose-response curves were tested for linearity and parallelism, assuming that the curves were parallel if no significant differences were found between the slopes (Kenakin, 1993).

One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the efficacy of drug treatment and to compare point by point the effects of drugs (or saline) with controls over whole recruitment curves. Similar analyses were made for the temporal evolution paradigm for the drug-treated curves vs. saline. Post hoc comparisons of individual means were made using Fisher's a posteriori least-significant difference test. Differences were considered significant at P < .05. Results are expressed as means ± S.E.M. for the number of animals indicated in table 1.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
General analysis of data related to the recruitment curve paradigm, after i.t. treatments and after i.c.v. treatments

For each treatment, the table gives the percentage of variation of the AURC and the treated/control ratios for the threshold and the slope of the recruitment curve.

Drugs. The following drugs were used: aspirin (lysine acetylsalicylate, Aspegic; Synthélabo, Meudon-la-Forêt, France), indomethacin (Indocid; Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Brussels, Belgium), ketoprofen (Profenid; Roda Mérieux, Santiago, Chile) and lysine clonixinate (pure substance; Roemmers, S.A.I.C.F., Buenos Aires, Argentina).

    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

General Characteristics of the Reflex Responses and Effects of Saline Administration

Electrical stimulation (2 msec, 0.17 Hz, at a suprathreshold intensity) within the territory of the sural nerve elicited a two-component EMG reflex response in the ipsilateral biceps femoris muscle. The first component, which had a short latency, a low threshold and a short duration (<50 msec), was due to activation of myelinated fibers and was not analyzed in this study. The second component, with a longer latency (around 160 msec at 3 times threshold), a longer duration and a higher threshold (6.1 ± 0.3 mA), resulted from activation of cutaneous unmyelinated afferent fibers; it has been termed the C-fiber reflex (Strimbu-Gozariu et al., 1993; Falinower et al., 1994; Guirimand et al., 1994) and has been used to compare the pharmacological profiles of opioids and NSAIDs administered by an i.v. route (Bustamante et al., 1996a). In the present study, we focused on this nociceptive flexion reflex, analyzing the EMG response in a 100- to 450-msec poststimulus time window (see control example in fig. 1).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Example of a reflex response to C-fiber activation and the effect of 500 µg of i.t. aspirin. The EMG responses recorded from the biceps femoris were elicited by electrical stimulation within the territory of the sural nerve (2-msec duration, 3 times threshold, at the times indicated by the arrows below the records). Calibration bars (lower right corner) represent time (horizontal) and electrical potential variations (vertical). Note the strong depressive effect seen 10, 20 and 30 min after the i.t. injection of 500 µg of aspirin.

Saline administration had little effect on either the amplitude or the duration of the reflex. In the constant-stimulus intensity paradigm, after i.t. or i.c.v. saline administration, there were only minor variations in the reflex amplitude during the 30-min recording period (see the individual example in fig. 2A for i.t. treatment and the averaged results in figs. 3A and 6A for i.t. and i.c.v. treatments, respectively); consequently, the percentage variation in AUC at a constant stimulus intensity did not reach statistical significance.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Individual examples of the temporal evolution of the reflex responses to C-fiber activation before and after 10-µl i.t. injections of saline and various NSAIDs. A, saline; B, aspirin; C, indomethacin; D, ketoprofen; E, lysine clonixinate. All drugs were given as doses of 500 µg. The stimulus intensity was 3 times threshold for the C-fiber reflex, and the C-fiber responses were analyzed within a 100- to 450-msec time-window and expressed as percentages (ordinate) of the control responses (horizontal dotted line) recorded during the 5-min period that preceded the injection. Abscissa, time (in minutes), with 0 indicating the time of the injection (arrow).


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Overall results showing the time courses of the effects of i.t. saline or various NSAIDs. The C-fiber responses were expressed as percentages (ordinate) of the control responses recorded during the 5-min period that preceded the injection (indicated by an arrow at time 0 on the abscissa). The spatial representation of the overall results was constructed by sequentially displaying the time courses for the effects of each treatment, with the doses increasing from back to front, as indicated to the right of each graph. The time points significantly different from the corresponding saline time points are shown as black dots. A, saline (10 µl); B, aspirin (50, 100 and 500 µg); C, indomethacin (100, 200 and 500 µg); D, ketoprofen (100, 300 and 500 µg); E, lysine clonixinate (100, 300 and 500 µg).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effects of the i.c.v. administration of saline and various NSAIDs on the C-fiber reflex. Left, time courses of the effects on the C-fiber reflex elicited by constant-intensity stimulation, with presentation as in figure 3. Right, effects on the C-fiber responses to a wide range of stimuli, with presentation as in figure 4. A, saline (10 µl); B, aspirin (500 µg); C, indomethacin (250 µg); D, ketoprofen (250 µg); E, lysine clonixinate (500 µg).

In the recruitment curve paradigm, the control and treatment curves (1-7 times threshold) were almost superimposed for the i.t. route (fig. 4A). However, after i.c.v. administration of 5 µl saline, the curve was slightly above the control. No statistical differences were found between the paired intensity points for the pre- and post-saline curves in the 1 to 7 times threshold range (see fig. 6A), although overall the increase in percentage of AURC was significant (table 1). For both routes, the post/pre-saline threshold ratio was nearly 1, as was the post/pre-saline slope ratio for the i.t. route. In contrast, the post/pre-saline slope ratio for i.c.v. treatment was greater than 1, reflecting a small facilitatory effect after administration of saline into the ventricle (table 1).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effects of the i.t. injection of saline or various NSAIDs on the C-fiber responses to a wide range of stimuli. In each case, the first recruitment curve was built during the control period and the second recruitment curve was built 30 min after the injection; doses are indicated to the right of each curve. Abscissa, stimulus intensities expressed as multiples of the thresholds for the control C-fiber reflex responses. Ordinate, integrals of the C-fiber responses, expressed as percentages of the maximal C-fiber control value, generally recorded at an intensity 7 times threshold (horizontal dotted line). For clarity of presentation, only ±1 S.E.M. is indicated for each point. The intensity points significantly different from the corresponding controls are shown as black dots. A, saline (10 µl); B, aspirin (50, 100 and 500 µg); C, indomethacin (100, 200 and 500 µg); D, ketoprofen (100, 300 and 500 µg); E, lysine clonixinate (100, 300 and 500 µg).

General Effects of NSAIDs

No perturbations in respiratory gases or cardiac activity were observed during or after either i.t. or i.c.v. administration of any of the drugs tested. The i.t. administration of aspirin, indomethacin, ketoprofen and lysine clonixinate resulted in a dose-dependent depression of the EMG response. Figure 1 shows a typical individual example of the depressive effect of 500 µg aspirin on the C-fiber reflex elicited by an intensity 3 times threshold. Individual examples of the temporal evolution of the reflex responses to C-fiber activation (stimulus currents of 3 times threshold) after i.t. injections of saline and various NSAIDs can be seen in figure 2. In each case, the effect of NSAIDs (500 µg) was rapid in onset and, after a 5- to 10-min period of relative recovery, remained constant for the whole period of the recording. In contrast, the i.c.v. administration of aspirin, indomethacin, ketoprofen and lysine clonixinate resulted in minor nondepressive effects. The effects of the i.t. and i.c.v. administrations are detailed below for each drug for both the constant-stimulation and recruitment curve paradigms.

Effects of i.t. NSAIDs

Effects of i.t. aspirin. As illustrated in figure 2B with an individual example for 500 µg and in figure 3B with the averaged results for three selected doses, aspirin decreased, in a dose-related fashion, the C-fiber reflex elicited by an intensity of 3 times threshold. Whereas 10 µg had no effect (data not shown), 50 µg produced a small but significant depression of the C-fiber reflex. In contrast, after 100, 200 (data not shown) and 500 µg of aspirin, all time points were statistically different (P < .01) from the respective time points in the post-saline curve shown in figure 3A.

The percentage of AUC, which represents the overall effects seen over the 30-min recording period, clearly increased with dose, reaching significance (P < .001) after 100 µg. A dose of 500 µg produced a percentage of AUC of 88%, which represents almost complete abolition of the C-fiber reflex during the recording period.

In the recruitment curve paradigm (fig. 4B), we observed a clear dose-related depressive effect in the 50- to 500-µg range. These depressive effects were dependent on the stimulus intensity and had no effect on the threshold (table 1). The post/pre-treatment slope ratios were nearly 1 after 50 and 100 µg but 0.15 after 500 µg (table 1), reflecting the drastic downward shift of the recruitment curve. In contrast to these depressive effects, a small facilitation was observed after 10 µg (data not shown in fig. 4B), as indicated by a negative percentage of AURC value and a post/pre-treatment slope ratio greater than 1 (table 1).

Effects of i.t. indomethacin. As illustrated in figure 2C with an individual example for 500 µg and in figure 3C with the averaged results for three selected doses, indomethacin decreased, in a dose-related fashion, the C-fiber reflex elicited by an intensity 3 times threshold. None of the time points of the curve for 100 µg were statistically different from those for saline, except for those seen 1 to 2 min after the injections. In contrast, after 200, 300 (data not shown) and 500 µg, all time points were statistically different (P < .001) from the respective time points in the post-saline curve shown in figure 3A. The percentage of AUC clearly increased with dose, reaching significance (P < .001) after 200 µg and its maximum (84%) after 500 µg.

In the recruitment curve paradigm (fig. 4C), no effects were seen after 100 µg but there were clear dose-related depressive effects in the 200- to 500-µg range (see percentage of AURC in table 1). Interestingly, the thresholds were increased dose-dependently by i.t. indomethacin, with post/pre-treatment threshold ratios of >1 being obtained for all doses (significant for 300 and 500 µg) (table 1). There was a gradual decrease in the post/pre-treatment slope ratios as the dose increased (table 1).

Effects of i.t. ketoprofen. As illustrated in figure 2D with an individual example for 500 µg and in figure 3D with the averaged results for three selected doses, ketoprofen decreased, in a dose-related fashion, the C-fiber reflex elicited by an intensity of 3 times threshold. None of the time points of the curves for 100 and 200 µg (data not shown) were statistically different from those for saline, except for those seen 1 to 4 min after the injections. In contrast, after 300 and 500 µg, all time points were statistically different (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively) from the respective time points in the post-saline curve shown in figure 3A. The percentage of AUC clearly increased with dose, reaching significance after 300 µg and its maximum (43%) after 500 µg.

In the recruitment curve paradigm (fig. 4D), no effects were seen after 100 µg but there were clear dose-related depressive effects in the 200- to 500-µg range (see percentage of AURC in table 1). Ketoprofen did not change the post/pre-treatment threshold ratios but did decrease, in a dose-dependent fashion, the post/pre-treatment slope ratios (table 1).

Effects of i.t. lysine clonixinate. As illustrated in figure 2E with an individual example for 500 µg and in figure 3E with the averaged results for three selected doses, lysine clonixinate decreased, in a dose-related fashion, the C-fiber reflex elicited by an intensity of 3 times threshold. None of the time points of the curve for 100 µg were statistically different from those for saline, except for those seen 1 to 2 min after the injections. However, from 10 min after administration of 200 µg (data not shown), all time points were statistically different (P < .05) from the respective time points for saline. After 300, 500 and 1000 µg, all time points were statistically lower (P < .001) than the respective time points in the post-saline curve.

In the recruitment curve paradigm (fig. 4E), there was a clear dose-related depressive effect in the 100- to 1000-µg range (see percentage of AURC in table 1). Lysine clonixinate did not change the post/pre-treatment threshold ratios in the 100- to 300-µg range but increased them in the 500- to 1000-µg range. The drug did decrease, in a dose-dependent fashion, the post/pre-treatment slope ratios (table 1).

Comparison of i.t. NSAIDs and Relative Potencies

The dose-response curves obtained in both the constant-stimulation and recruitment curve paradigms are shown in figure 5. These were established on the basis of the variations of AUC and AURC, respectively. The effective doses that produced 50% depression were used for comparisons. Based on the ED50 values with 95% confidence intervals, the following order of potencies was established: 1) in the constant-stimulation paradigm: aspirin [148 (126-164) µg] > indomethacin [236 (182-266) µg] > ketoprofen [724 (669-754) µg] >=  lysine clonixinate [639 (583-650) µg]; 2) in the recruitment curve paradigm: aspirin [172 (149-187) µg] > indomethacin [250 (155-336) µg] > lysine clonixinate [586 (500-650) µg] >=  ketoprofen [627 (525-699) µg].


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   A, dose-response curves obtained with the constant-stimulus intensity paradigm after i.t. treatments. The dose-response curves were built by making a semilogarithmic plot of the percentage depressions of the C-fiber response (ordinate) induced by different doses of the drug (abscissa), by applying the least-squares method. The corresponding percentage of AUC for saline was -1.2 ± 1.7% (data not shown). The regression lines were as follows: indomethacin, y = 113 log x - 216 (r21 = 0.835; P < .02); ketoprofen, y = 54 log x - 106 (r18 = 0.781; P < .02); lysine clonixinate, y = 60 log x - 118 (r22 = 0.928; P < .01); aspirin, y = 72 log x - 107 (r13 = 0.863; P < .01). B, dose-response curves obtained with the recruitment curve paradigm after i.t. treatments. For each experiment, the AURC values in the range of 1 to 7 times threshold were calculated before (AURCcontrol) and after (AURCtreated) drug treatment. The drug effect was calculated in percentage terms. The corresponding percentage of AURC for saline was 5.7 ± 3.6% (data not shown). The regression lines were as follows: indomethacin, y = 133 log x - 269 (r15 = 0.808; P < .01); ketoprofen, y = 91 log x - 205 (r18 = 0.796; P < .05); lysine clonixinate, y = 71 log x - 147 (r18 = 0.780; P < .02); aspirin, y = 66 log x - 98 (r13 = 0.751; P < .02). The ED50 for these curves are shown as dotted lines.

In the constant-stimulation paradigm, the slope of the indomethacin curve was significantly higher (P < .05) than the slopes of the ketoprofen or clonixinate curves but not that of the aspirin curve; there were no significant differences between the values for the aspirin, ketoprofen and clonixinate curves. In the recruitment curve paradigm, there were no significant differences between the slopes of the dose-response curves, although a trend similar to that seen with the constant-stimulation paradigm was observed.

Effects of i.c.v. NSAIDs

A general overview of the results obtained with i.c.v. administration of the drugs shows that they did not produce depressive effects, despite the high doses used. As illustrated in figure 6 (left) for the constant-stimulation paradigm, none of the drugs were able to decrease the magnitude of the C-fiber reflex during the 30-min recording period. The apparent small facilitatory effects were not statistically different from the respective time points in the post-saline curve shown in figure 6A (left). Similar results were obtained with the recruitment curve paradigm (fig. 6, right). The post-treatment curves were slightly above the corresponding control curves, which possibly reflected a small facilitatory effect; however, only a few intensity points were statistically different from the controls. These data are summarized in table 1 in terms of percentage of AURC, post/pre-treatment threshold ratios and slope ratios for the recruitment curve paradigm; none of these parameters showed significant effects.

    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References

This study shows that i.t. but not i.c.v. administration of various NSAIDs results in dose-dependent depression of a nociceptive flexion reflex elicited by activation of C-fiber afferents in the sural nerve of anesthetized rats. This work is of particular interest for the following reasons. 1) It involved the use of a simple noninvasive method for recording and analyzing a C-fiber reflex that previously had been shown to be very sensitive to i.t. µ-opioid agonists in anesthetized animals that had undergone minimal surgical preparation (Strimbu-Gozariu et al., 1993; Guirimand et al., 1994). The model is also sensitive to the systemic administration of high doses of NSAIDs (Bustamante et al., 1996a). Compared with most pharmacological tests related to nociception and analgesia, which involve either threshold measurements or responses to a single suprathreshold stimulus, we introduced a new parameter in these studies, namely the use of stimulus-response recruitment curves. Thus, information regarding the effects of drugs on the responses to threshold and suprathreshold stimuli can be obtained. 2) The C-fiber reflex was elicited by direct stimulation of nerve terminals and fibers, thus bypassing all transduction processes at a peripheral level. Moreover, because NSAIDs were injected directly into the spinal cord, any effects obtained with such a method must be interpreted in terms of central mechanisms. 3) No antinociceptive effects were obtained when the NSAIDs were injected into the lateral ventricle. 4) The depressive effects observed after the direct spinal administration were achieved in the absence of any inflammatory processes or ongoing sustained afferent barrages generated by an irritant sustained stimulus (in other words, in the absence of any "peripheral or central facilitation"); thus, these results firmly support a central analgesic action of NSAIDs on the spinal transmission of nociceptive signals. We discuss successively the antinociceptive effects of i.c.v. NSAIDs, the antinociceptive effects of i.t. NSAIDs, the effects of i.t. NSAIDs on threshold and suprathreshold responses and some possible mechanisms of action.

Antinociceptive effects of i.c.v. NSAIDs. Direct i.c.v. administration of NSAIDs has been reported to be active in animal models of experimental pain where inflammatory processes are involved and hyperalgesia is obvious. For example, Ferreira et al. (1978) reported that i.c.v. aspirin (200-400 µg), indomethacin (50-100 µg) or paracetamol (200-400 µg) decreased the hyperalgesia elicited by an injection of carragenin into the plantar surface of the rat paw. These results were confirmed with other tests in rats; i.c.v. paracetamol, indomethacin, diclofenac, ibuprofen and metamizol suppressed hyperalgesia after postischemic reperfusion (Gelgor et al., 1992), i.c.v. indomethacin diminished electrically induced vocalization responses in arthritic rats (Okuyama and Aihara, 1984), i.c.v. ketoprofen diminished thalamic neuronal firing elicited by ankle mobilization in arthritic rats (Braga, 1990) and increased the tail-flick latency (Rampin et al., 1988), i.c.v. diclofenac decreased the number of abdominal constrictions (Björkman et al., 1990, 1992) and salicylate inhibited the lame-walking reaction in adjuvant-induced, hind-paw-edematous rats (Higushi et al., 1986).

The doses injected in those studies were either lower than or of the same order as those used in our experiments. We do not believe, therefore, that our negative results after i.c.v. injections could be explained by the use of doses that were too low. It should be noted that others have also failed to demonstrate significant analgesia after i.c.v. administration of NSAIDs, using 50 µg of indomethacin in a visceral pain model in rabbits (Hu et al., 1994), 100 µg of ketoprofen or ibuprofen with the lame-walking reaction in adjuvantinduced, hind-paw-edematous rats (Higushi et al., 1986) and 250 to 500 µg of aspirin with the mouse-licking behavior in the formalin test (Meglio et al., 1991). It is possible that the supraspinal effects of NSAIDs are triggered only in the presence of a hyperalgesic or inflammatory state, whereas we are dealing presently with a model of acute nociception.

Antinociceptive effects of i.t. NSAIDs. Antinociceptive effects produced by the i.t. administration of various NSAIDs have been reported in studies using several models of experimental pain. Malmberg and Yaksh (1992a), using the formalin test, reported antinociceptive effects of i.t. NSAIDs and concluded that their actions were related to their ability to block prostanoid formation (Malmberg and Yaksh, 1992b). Ten micrograms of diclofenac have been reported to decrease the number of abdominal constrictions in the abdominal constriction test in mice (Björkman et al., 1990); antinociceptive effects have also been reported with the tail-flick and paw-withdrawal tests in rats (Taiwo and Levine, 1988; Wang et al., 1994) and the colorectal distension model in rabbits (Jensen et al., 1992). However, using the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration as an index of pain, Antognini (1993) reported a lack of effect, on the response to a suprathreshold mechanical stimulus, of i.t. doses as high as 500 µg/kg aspirin or indomethacin in rabbits. A general analysis of the results reviewed above shows that the range of active doses was variable, depending on the NSAID tested, the test used and the species. However, all active doses were in the 10- to 500-µg range, which is comparable to the effective doses in the present study.

Interestingly, i.t. indomethacin (250 µg but not less) reduced the responses of dorsal horn neurons to the s.c. injection of formalin within the hind paw but not to the activation of C-fibers (Chapman and Dickenson, 1992). The preparation used by those authors was similar, in terms of species and anesthesia, to that used presently and the dose was close to the ED50 (236 µg) that we found. We have mentioned already that the model used here seems very sensitive to opioids, because low doses of i.t. morphine strongly depressed the C-fiber reflex, with an ED50 of 0.2 µg (Strimbu-Gozariu et al., 1993). Dickenson and Sullivan (1986) reported a dose-dependent depression of the C-fiber evoked activity of dorsal horn neurons after i.t. morphine, with an ED50 of 5.5 µg. The apparently greater sensitivity of the present preparation to analgesic drugs, compared with recordings from dorsal horn neurons, could be due to the convergence of inputs onto motoneurons, as suggested by the higher mean threshold for the C-fiber reflex, compared with the mean threshold for C-fiber responses of dorsal horn neurons.

Jurna et al. (1992), using stimuli similar to those in the present study, reported that i.t. aspirin (37.5-50 µg) or indomethacin (50-100 µg) depressed the responses, to stimulation of the sural nerve, of single cells in the ventrobasal complex of the thalamus. As in the present study, those results were obtained with a method that bypassed all transduction processes at the peripheral level and did not involve any inflammatory processes. Note that the relative potencies of aspirin and indomethacin were similar to our findings, although the efficacious doses were slightly lower.

Finally, the potential of aspirin to exhibit a direct spinal effect for alleviating pain in humans has been confirmed in clinical trials with patients, including those suffering from cancer pain. Devoghel (1983) successfully used 500 µg/kg, whereas Pellerin et al. (1987) administered 120 to 750 mg of i.t. aspirin. Interestingly, because we used rats with body weights of 250 to 300 g, the ED50 for aspirin was in the 420 to 656 µg/kg range, which is close to the efficacious dose used by Devoghel (1983).

Effects of i.t. NSAIDs on threshold and suprathreshold responses. The study using recruitment curves revealed that the spinal administration of NSAIDs did not produce significant modifications of the C-fiber reflex elicited by the lower (<2.5 times threshold) stimulus intensities. In contrast, all NSAIDs clearly depressed the response to the higher stimulus intensities, in a dose-dependent fashion. Using the same approach, similar results were found after i.v. administration of the same drugs (Bustamante et al., 1996a). Interestingly, µ-opioid agonists not only produced a shift in the encoding functions of the spinal cord but above all reduced the gain of these functions, which produced a blockade of the C-fiber reflex regardless of the stimulus intensity; for instance, 1 µg i.t. or 10 mg/kg i.v. morphine completely suppressed all EMG responses elicited by the activation of C-fibers (Strimbu-Gozariu et al., 1993; Guirimand et al., 1994, 1995a). Interestingly, high doses of the opioid receptor partial agonist buprenorphine depressed the C-fiber reflex, but only at weak stimulus intensities (Guirimand et al., 1995a). Thus, from the use of the recruitment curve paradigm, it appears that analgesic drugs exhibit at least three pharmacological profiles, acting on responses to low, high or all stimulus intensities.

The constant-stimulus intensity and the recruitment curve paradigms produced the same order of potency, namely aspirin > indomethacin > lysine clonixinate = ketoprofen. Interestingly, after i.v. administration, the order of potency was different, namely indomethacin > lysine clonixinate = ketoprofen > aspirin (Bustamante et al., 1996a). In other words, the order of potency was identical for indomethacin, ketoprofen and lysine clonixinate but aspirin moved from last to first place when the route of administration was changed from i.v. to i.t. This observation is consistent with the fact that the rates of diffusion of acetylsalicylic acid and its metabolite salicylic acid through the blood-brain barrier are slower than those of ketoprofen and indomethacin (Netter et al., 1985; Ochs et al., 1985; Bannwarth et al., 1989, 1990). The constant-stimulus intensity paradigm allowed us to investigate the temporal evolution of the depressive action of each of the NSAIDs. In the present study, the effects of the i.t. drugs had an extremely rapid onset, suggesting that the active pharmacological sites of action were reached easily with this route of administration. This was not the case after i.v. administration, where the effects of aspirin were characterized by a slow progressive increase, whereas the actions of indomethacin, ketoprofen and lysine clonixinate peaked quickly, in a manner very similar to that of the effects described in the present study.

Possible mechanism(s) of action. As previously stated, the C-fiber reflex was elicited by stimulation of nerve terminals and fibers, thus bypassing all transduction processes at a peripheral level. In addition, the drugs were applied directly over the spinal cord. As a result, the NSAIDs tested in the present study are likely to have had a central action at the spinal level, as proposed previously (for reviews, see Brune, 1994; McCormack, 1994a,b; Björkman, 1995). However, the hypothesis that NSAIDs act at higher levels within the central nervous system and activate descending inhibitory influences on the spinal transmission of nociceptive information has been proposed for metamizol and aminophenazone (Carlsson and Jurna, 1987; Carlsson et al., 1986, 1988). It has also been suggested that monoaminergic mechanisms, e.g., through bulbospinal noradrenergic or serotonergic inhibitory systems, might account for the efficacy of NSAIDs (Shyu et al., 1984; Groppetti et al., 1988; Taiwo and Levine, 1988; Tjölsen et al., 1991). Interestingly, the effects of i.t. paracetamol in the paw-pressure test were abolished by the i.t. administration of tropisetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonist (Pelissier et al., 1995). A supraspinal site of action on the spinal transmission of nociceptive information is strongly suggested in humans, at least for ketoprofen, because the drug-induced increase in the threshold of the RIII reflex seen in normal volunteers was not seen in paraplegic patients with chronic spinal cord sections (Willer et al., 1989). However, the hypothesis that NSAIDs act at higher levels within the central nervous system and activate descending inhibitory influences on the spinal transmission of nociceptive information is not supported by the present findings, where NSAIDs administered via the i.c.v. route were without effect.

On the basis of the present study, we have no way of reaching definitive conclusions regarding the biochemical mechanism(s) of action of NSAIDs. However, on the basis of the similarity among the slopes in the dose-response relationships, it could be proposed, but not proven, that all of the drugs tested probably have identical mechanism(s) of action (Kenakin, 1984), possibly against prostaglandin biosynthesis, as suggested by the following lines of evidence. Intrathecal administration of prostaglandins has been reported to increase nociceptive responses (Yaksh, 1982; Taiwo and Levine, 1988; Uda et al., 1990; Minami et al., 1994a,b; Nishihara et al., 1995; Saito et al., 1995). Activation of high-threshold nociceptive afferent inputs has been found to release prostaglandins within the spinal cord (Ramwell et al., 1966; Coderre et al., 1990), which, in turn, can enhance Ca++ conductance and the subsequent release of substance P from dorsal root ganglion cells (Nicol et al., 1992). Furthermore, microdialysis studies in conscious rats have revealed that formalin injections into the hind paw elicit the spinal release of prostaglandin E2, in a dose-dependent fashion, which is reduced by pretreatment with morphine (Malmberg and Yaksh, 1995a) or cyclooxygenase inhibitors (Malmberg and Yaksh, 1995b). Finally, the i.t. administration of prostaglandin E receptor antagonists produces antinociceptive effects in the formalin test in rats (Malmberg et al., 1994).

One cannot exclude the possibility that other and/or complementary mechanisms might explain the results reported herein. In fact, an almost complete dissociation between analgesic efficacy and the potency to inhibit cyclooxygenase has been demonstrated for some NSAIDs (Brune et al., 1991, 1992; McCormack and Brune, 1991). It is possible that cyclooxygenase inhibitors have additional mechanisms of action (Vane, 1994); such possibilities were reviewed extensively (McCormack, 1994b; Bannwarth et al., 1995; Björkman, 1995).

Because i.t. NSAIDs block the behavioral signs of hyperalgesia elicited by an i.t. excitatory amino acid such as NMDA and alpha -amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid or substance P (Hunskaar et al., 1985; Malmberg and Yaksh, 1992b; Björkman et al., 1994), they have the potential to impair both the release and the effects of neurotransmitters or neuromodulators involved in the spinal transmission of nociceptive information. Direct or indirect effects of NSAIDs on NMDA receptors are suggested in the present study by the depressive action of the drugs on the responses to suprathreshold stimuli, with minimal effects on responses to lower levels of stimulation. The NMDA receptor is blocked by Mg++ ions in a voltage-dependent fashion (Asher and Nowak, 1987), which means that only very strong excitatory signals cause a depolarization of neurons sufficient to activate NMDA receptors. When the NMDA receptor is activated by glutamate, the rise of Ca++ ions in the cell activates phospholipase A2, resulting in the formation of arachidonic acid from membrane phospholipids (Dumuis et al., 1988). Because arachidonic acid potentiates NMDA currents, increases the release of glutamate from presynaptic terminals and impairs its glial reuptake (Chan et al., 1983; Rhoads et al., 1983; Miller et al., 1992), it follows that arachidonic acid would amplify the activation of NMDA receptors. Whether a NSAID-sensitive mechanism is involved in such an action remains to be investigated; for this purpose, a study of the effects of glucocorticoids on the C-fiber reflex could be interesting.

In summary, we have reported the antinociceptive potency of i.t. NSAIDs, belonging to different families of drugs, in a model of acute pain. These antinociceptive effects occurred without any facilitatory or hyperalgesic components. These findings suggest a crucial role for cyclooxygenase products in the spinal transmission of acute nociceptive signals when the intensity (afferent barrage) reaches a sufficient level. Because other analgesic drugs, such as buprenorphine, depress C-fiber responses only to low intensities of stimulation (Guirimand et al., 1995a,b), it is tempting to suggest a rational therapeutic association for these two types of compounds.

    Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. J. M. Benoist and S. W. Cadden for advice on the preparation of the manuscript.

    Footnotes

Accepted for publication February 3, 1997.

Received for publication October 3, 1996.

1   This work was supported by INSERM. D.B. was supported by a fellowship from Roemmers Labs, Argentina.

Send reprint requests to: Dr. D. Le Bars, INSERM U-161, 2, rue d'Alésia, 75014 Paris, France.

    Abbreviations

AUC, area under the curve; AURC, area under the recruitment curve; EMG, electromyographic; i.t., intrathecal; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References


0022-3565/97/2813-1381$03.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bustamante, D.
Right arrow Articles by Le Bars, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bustamante, D.
Right arrow Articles by Le Bars, D.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition