![]() |
|
|
Vol. 281, Issue 2, 761-768, 1997
Departments of Medicine (C.A.K.-B., J.R., J.S., L.B.) and Pharmacology (J.K.H., M.O., L.B.), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida and Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania (M.J.)
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The allosteric enhancer PD 81,723, a 2-amino-3-benzoylthiophene
derivative, has been shown to potentiate agonist binding to A1 adenosine receptors (A1AdoRs) and to enhance
the functional effects of adenosine and adenosine analogs. The
objective of this study was to determine whether the apparent
agonist-independent effect of PD 81,723 observed in CHO cells stably
expressing the recombinant human A1AdoR was due to the
potentiation of the action of endogenous adenosine, to the presence of
constitutive receptor activity and/or to the binding of PD 81,723 to
the agonist binding site of the A1AdoR. The allosteric
enhancer PD 81,723, the A1AdoR agonist
(R)-N6-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine and
adenosine all significantly inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP
accumulation in intact cells and increased
[35S]-5
-(
-thio)triphosphate binding to cell
membranes. The effects of adenosine on cAMP formation and
[35S]-5
-(
-thio)triphosphate binding were attenuated
by adenosine deaminase, but the effects of PD 81,723 were not. In the
presence of ADA, the A1AdoR antagonist
8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine increased forskolin-stimulated cAMP
accumulation in cells expressing the recombinant human
A1AdoR but not in nontransfected CHO cells. In binding
experiments, the agonist
(R)-N6-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine, but not
PD 81,723, significantly displaced the specific binding of the
A1AdoR agonist
[3H]-N6-cyclohexyladenosine and the
antagonist [3H]-8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine. The
results of this study demonstrate that in CHO cells stably expressing
the recombinant human A1AdoR, the agonist-independent
effect of PD 81,723 is not due to potentiation of the action of
endogenous adenosine or mediated by the binding of the allosteric
enhancer to the agonist binding site of the recombinant human
A1AdoR. It is possible that these effects are due to
potentiation of constitutive receptor activity by PD 81,723.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The
2-amino-3-benzoylthiophene derivative PD 81,723 has been shown to
enhance A1AdoR-mediated responses of adenosine and
adenosine analogs in guinea pig isolated perfused hearts (Amoah-Apraku
et al., 1993
; Kollias-Baker et al., 1994a
,
1994b
), rat isolated atria (Mudumbi et al., 1993
), rat
hippocampal brain slices (Janusz et al., 1991
) and cultured
FRTL-5 rat thyroid cells (Bruns and Fergus, 1990
). It has been
hypothesized that PD 81,723 potentiates A1AdoR-mediated actions by enhancing the binding of agonists to the receptor (Bruns and
Fergus, 1990
; Kollias-Baker et al., 1994a
). PD 81,723 has been shown to enhance the binding of adenosine agonists to
A1AdoR but not A2AdoR in membranes from human,
guinea pig, rat and dog brain tissue (Bruns and Fergus, 1990
) and human
and guinea pig cardiac tissue (Kollias-Baker et al., 1994a
).
These results are entirely consistent with those reported in functional
studies (Bruns and Fergus, 1990
; Kollias-Baker et al.,
1994a
). In the heart, where both A1AdoRs and
A2AdoRs are present, PD 81,723 selectively enhances the
A1AdoR- but not A2AdoR-mediated actions of
adenosine agonists (Kollias-Baker et al., 1994a
). In
addition, in the heart (Kollias-Baker et al., 1994a
) and in
hippocampal brain slices (Janusz et al., 1991
), PD 81,723 alone (i.e., in the absence of adenosine or
A1AdoR agonists) does not mimic the effect of adenosine or
A1AdoR agonists. Thus, in these preparations, PD 81,723 enhances agonist-mediated responses but by itself it has no effect.
In a recent study carried out in CHO cells stably expressing the
recombinant human A1AdoR, PD 81,723 was found to increase (1) the fraction of receptors in the high-affinity binding state, (2)
the concentration of GTP
S required to half maximally uncouple receptor/G proteins complexes, (3) the binding of an A1AdoR
agonist and (4) the potency of that same agonist to decrease
forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation (Bhattacharya and Linden, 1995
).
These findings are consistent with the results of previous studies in
human and guinea pig cardiac membranes; rat, dog and guinea pig
forebrain membranes; and cultured FRTL-5 cells (Bruns and Fergus, 1990
; Kollias-Baker et al., 1994a
). A provocative finding of the
study in CHO cells was that PD 81,723 alone, in the absence of an
agonist, inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation (Bhattacharya and Linden, 1995
). This apparent agonist-independent effect of PD
81,723 was not present in functional studies in isolated guinea pig
hearts (Amoah-Apraku et al., 1993
; Kollias-Baker et
al., 1994a
, 1994b
), rat isolated atria (Mudumbi et al.,
1993
) or rat hippocampal brain slices (Janusz et al., 1991
)
but was noted in cultured FRTL-5 cells (Bruns and Fergus, 1990
). It was
postulated that this effect of the allosteric enhancer was due to PD
81,723 potentiating the action of either endogenous adenosine in the
media or constitutive receptor activity (Bhattacharya and Linden,
1995
). Alternatively, this effect of the allosteric enhancer could have
been mediated by the binding of PD 81,723 to the agonist binding site
of the recombinant human A1AdoR. Which of these mechanisms,
however, is responsible for this effect of PD 81,723 remains to be
determined. Therefore, in the present study we sought to determine
whether the apparent agonist-independent effect of PD 81,723 observed in CHO cells stably expressing the recombinant human A1AdoR
was due to the potentiation of the action of endogenous adenosine, to
the presence of constitutive receptor activity and/or to the binding of
PD 81,723 to the agonist binding site of the A1AdoR.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials.
PD 81,723 was the generous gift of Dr. Noel
Cusack (Discovery Therapeutics, Richmond, VA). The human
A1AdoR cDNA (GenBank accession no. X68485) was cloned as a
1.4-kb HindIII/XbaI fragment into the expression
vector pCMV5 (Mumby et al., 1990
) and cotransfected with
pWLneo (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) into CHO-KI cells (American Type
Culture Collection CCL 61, Rockville, MD) according to the calcium
phosphate method. Neomycin-resistant colonies were selected in 1 mg/ml
G-418 and screened for expression of A1 receptors using the
A1AdoR agonist [3H]CHA binding. cAMP,
GTP
S, GDP, Tris·HCl, hydroxyapatite, dithiothreitol, ADA and
bovine adrenal extract were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St.
Louis, MO). CPX, CPA, and (R)-PIA were purchased from Research Biochemicals Inc. (Natick, MA). [3H]CHA,
[3H]CPX, [3H]cAMP and
[35S]GTP[S] were purchased from DuPont-New England
Nuclear Research Products (Boston, MA). G-418, trypsin EDTA and HBSS
were purchased from GIBCO Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD). Ham's
F-12 cell culture media and fetal bovine serum were obtained from
Mediatech Inc. (Washington, D.C.).
Cell Culture
CHO cells stably expressing the recombinant human A1AdoR were grown as monolayers on 150-mm plastic culture dishes in Ham's F-12 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum in the presence of 0.5 mg/ml G-418 in an atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air at 37°C. Cells were subcultured twice weekly after detachment using 0.25% trypsin and 1 mM EDTA in HBSS. Cells were used 1 day before confluency.
Protocols
Membrane preparations. CHO cells stably expressing the recombinant human A1AdoR were collected from culture dishes, homogenized in 25 ml of ice-cold 50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.4, and centrifuged at 48,000 × g for 15 min. The membrane pellet was washed twice by resuspension in fresh buffer and centrifugation. Final pellets were resuspended in 50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.4.
Radioligand binding. To determine the effect of the allosteric enhancer on the binding of ligands to the A1AdoR, CHO cell membranes (0.04-0.1 mg of protein) were incubated in a buffer solution (300 µl) containing 50 mM Tris·HCl and the radioligand ([3H]CHA or [3H]CPX) for 2 hr at 19°C to 22°C in the absence and presence of PD 81,723. Specific binding of the radioligand was determined by subtracting nonspecific binding from total binding. Nonspecific binding of [3H]CHA and [3H]CPX was determined using unlabeled CPA (10 µM) and CPX (10 µM), respectively. Experiments were carried out in buffer containing 2 units/ml ADA unless otherwise stated.
To determine the effect of the allosteric enhancer on [35S]GTP[S] binding to G proteins in the absence and presence of A1AdoR agonists, CHO cell membranes (0.05-0.1 mg of protein) were incubated for 45 min at 19°C to 22°C in buffer (200 µl) containing 50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 µM GDP, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 100 mM NaCl, 0.3 to 0.5 nM [35S]GTP[S] (~50,000 cpm) and 0.5% bovine serum albumin in the presence and absence of PD 81,723 (Lorenzen et al., 1994cAMP assays. cAMP assays were carried out on cells in suspension or on attached cells plated in 12-well clusters. Results presented are from experiments performed with cells in suspension unless otherwise indicated.
For cell suspensions, cells were removed from culture plates by treatment with 1 mM EDTA in HBSS for 10 min. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 500 × g for 5 min, followed by resuspension in fresh HBSS and repeat pelleting. Cells were then resuspended in HBSS containing 2 units/ml ADA (unless stated otherwise). Drugs were added to microcentrifuge tubes containing aliquots of the cell suspension in a final volume of 300 µl. The tubes containing the drugs and the cells were then incubated for 6 min at 37°C. Incubations were terminated by transferring tubes to a boiling water bath for 5 min. Cellular debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 2000 × g for 5 min, and the supernates were transferred to new microcentrifuge tubes for determination of cAMP content. To determine the cellular content of cAMP, 50-µl aliquots of supernate were incubated in buffer (150 µl) containing 50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.4, [3H]cAMP (4 nM) and bovine adrenal cortex extract in a final volume of 200 µl for 1 hr at 0°C (Baker et al., 1985Data Analysis
All values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. unless otherwise
stated. Statistical analysis of differences among values in experiments with multiple-comparison groups was based on analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni testing. For experiments with two comparison groups, statistical analysis was performed with a two-tailed
t test (IN STAT MAC, GraphPAD Software, San Diego, CA).
Differences between group mean values were considered significant at
P
.05. Binding parameters (i.e.,
Bmax, Kd,
IC50, and Ki) were determined using
the radioligand binding analysis program LIGAND 4.0 (Elsevier-Biosoft).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effect of PD 81,723 on agonist and antagonist binding.
To
determine whether the allosteric enhancer PD 81,723 potentiates agonist
binding to A1AdoR, saturation binding experiments (n = 3) were performed using membranes prepared from
CHO cells expressing recombinant human A1AdoR. As shown in
figure 1, the maximum specific binding
(Bmax) of the A1AdoR agonist
[3H]CHA increased from 1306 ± 98 fmol/mg of protein
in the absence to 1774 ± 105 fmol/mg of protein in the presence
of PD 81,723 (10 µM; P
.05). The concentration of
[3H]CHA at which half of the receptors were occupied
(Kd) was not significantly (P
.05)
different in the absence (3.5 ± 0.3 nM) or presence (3.4 ± 0.2 nM) of PD 81,723 (10 µM). In contrast to the effect of PD 81,723 on agonist binding, the maximum specific binding
(Bmax) of the A1AdoR antagonist
[3H]CPX was not significantly (P
.05) different
in the absence (10,288 ± 240 fmol/mg of protein) and presence
(10,474 ± 205 fmol/mg of protein) of PD 81,723 (10 µM;
n = 3). In addition, the Kd of [3H]CPX was also not significantly (P
.05)
different in the absence (1.7 ± 0.7 nM) or presence (1.4 ± 1.2 nM) of PD 81,723 (10 µM). The results of these experiments
demonstrated that PD 81,723 significantly enhanced agonist, but not
antagonist, binding to the recombinant human A1AdoR.
|
Affinity of the A1AdoR agonist
(R)-PIA and the allosteric enhancer PD 81,723 for the
recombinant human A1AdoR.
Competition
binding experiments (n = 3) were carried out to
determine the effects of (R)-PIA and PD 81,723 on the
binding of the agonist radioligand [3H]CHA (2 nM) and the
antagonist radioligand [3H]CPX (1 nM) to recombinant
human A1AdoR. The A1AdoR agonist
(R)-PIA decreased the specific binding of
[3H]CHA (fig. 2A) and
[3H]CPX (fig. 2B) in a concentration-dependent manner.
The concentrations of (R)-PIA that displaced half of the
specific binding (i.e., Ki) of
[3H]CHA and [3H]CPX were 7.7 ± 2.2 nM
and 820 ± 104 nM, respectively (fig. 2). In contrast to the
effect of the agonist (R)-PIA , the effect of the allosteric
enhancer PD 81,723 on the specific binding of [3H]CHA was
biphasic. The specific binding of [3H]CHA increased as
the concentration of PD 81,723 was raised from 0.1 to 10 µM and fell
when the concentration of PD 81,723 was further increased (fig. 2A).
The allosteric enhancer did not, however, enhance the binding of the
antagonist radioligand. PD 81,723, at concentrations >10 µM,
decreased the specific binding of [3H]CPX (fig. 2B).
|
Effects of (R)-PIA and PD 81,723 on
forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation.
Activation of the
A1AdoR by adenosine agonists has been shown to decrease
forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation in many different cell types
(Altio et al., 1992
; Ma and Green, 1992
; Murphy et al., 1995
). In CHO cells expressing the recombinant human
A1AdoR, both the agonist (R)-PIA and the
allosteric enhancer PD 81,723 inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP
accumulation in a concentration-dependent manner in the presence of
adenosine deaminase (ADA = 2 units/ml), an enzyme that catalyzes
the degradation of adenosine to inosine (fig. 3). In a
series of three experiments, forskolin (2 µM) increased cellular cAMP
accumulation from a base-line level of 34 ± 12 pmol/mg to
823 ± 94 pmol/mg of cellular protein (fig. 3; control). The A1AdoR agonist (R)-PIA at concentrations of 0.5, 1 and 5 nM decreased forskolin (2 µM) stimulated cAMP accumulation to
46 ± 7%, 24 ± 6% and 14 ± 2%, respectively, of the
control value (fig. 3; P
.05). In a separate series of
experiments (n = 3) in which forskolin (2 µM)
increased cellular cAMP accumulation from a baseline level of 45 ± 9 pmol/mg to 797 ± 137 pmol/mg of cellular protein (control), PD 81,723 at concentrations of 5, 25 and 50 µM decreased forskolin (2 µM) stimulated cAMP accumulation to 49 ± 2%, 34 ± 3%
and 24 ± 4%, respectively, of control (fig. 3; P
.05).
|
Effect of ADA on adenosine- and PD 81,723-mediated inhibition of
forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation.
In CHO cells expressing
the recombinant human A1AdoR, adenosine (0.5 µM) in the
absence of ADA significantly (P
.05) decreased forskolin (2 µM)-stimulated cAMP accumulation by 96 ± 3% (fig. 4A; n = 3). In the same cells and in the
absence of ADA, PD 81,723 (10 µM) significantly (P
.05)
decreased forskolin (5 µM)-stimulated cAMP accumulation by 50 ± 9% (fig. 4B; n = 3). In the presence of ADA (
2
units/ml), however, adenosine failed to decrease forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation (fig. 4A). As shown in figure 4A, in the presence of
adenosine (0.5 µM) and ADA at concentrations of 2, 5 and 10 units/ml,
the cAMP accumulations caused by forskolin (2 µM) were 445 ± 50, 476 ± 52 and 496 ± 34 pmol/mg of cellular protein,
respectively. These values were not significantly different (P
.05) from the accumulation of cAMP in the presence of forskolin (2 µM) alone (538 ± 15 pmol/mg of cellular protein; fig. 4A). In
contrast to the effect of adenosine, the inhibition of
forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation caused by PD 81,723 was not
attenuated by ADA (fig. 4B). The forskolin (5 µM)-stimulated cAMP
accumulations in the presence of PD 81,723 (10 µM) alone and PD
81,723 (10 µM) and ADA (10 units/ml) were 429 ± 78 and 432 ± 69 pmol/mg of cellular protein, respectively. Both values were
significantly (P
.05) less than cAMP accumulation in the
presence of forskolin (5 µM) alone (control; 854 ± 125 pmol/mg
of cellular protein). Thus, ADA abolished the inhibitory effect of
adenosine, but not PD 81,723, on forskolin-stimulated cAMP
accumulation.
|
Synergistic effect of (R)-PIA and PD 81,723 to inhibit
forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation.
The A1AdoR
agonist (R)-PIA (0.2 nM) and the allosteric enhancer PD
81,723 (2.5 µM) significantly (P
.05) decreased forskolin (2 µM) stimulated cAMP accumulation from a control (i.e., in
the absence of (R)-PIA and PD 81,723) value of 712 ± 26 pmol/mg to 543 ± 17 and 587 ± 14 pmol/mg of cellular
protein, respectively (fig. 5; n = 3).
In combination, however, the same concentrations of (R)-PIA
and PD 81,723 decreased the forskolin (2 µM)-stimulated cAMP
accumulation to 350 ± 12 pmol/mg of cellular protein. The decrease in cAMP caused by the combination of (R)-PIA and PD
81,723 was significantly greater (P
.05) than the decrease
caused by either agent alone and greater than the expected decrease
caused by the additive effect of both agents together (fig. 5).
|
Effect of CPX on forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation.
The
effect of the A1AdoR antagonist CPX on cAMP accumulation
was determined in nontransfected CHO cells and CHO cells expressing the
recombinant human A1AdoR treated with 1 µM forskolin
(n = 3). In the absence of CPX, cAMP accumulation in
nontransfected cells treated with 1 µM forskolin (control) was
335 ± 15.0 nmol, which was significantly (P
.05) greater
than cAMP accumulation in CHO cells expressing A1AdoR
(153 ± 17.0 nmol). As shown in figure 6, CPX
increased cAMP accumulation in CHO cells expressing A1AdoR
but not in nontransfected cells. In CHO cells expressing A1AdoR, CPX caused a concentration-dependent increase in
cellular cAMP accumulation (fig. 6). CPX at concentrations of 3, 10 and 30 nM caused a 130 ± 4.4%, 175 ± 6.5% and 257 ± 15.5% increase in cAMP accumulation above control, respectively (fig.
6). As shown in figure 6, CPX (3, 10 and 30 nM) had no effect on cAMP accumulation in nontransfected cells (P
.05).
|
Effects of (R)-PIA and PD 81,723 on
[35S]GTP[S] binding.
A1AdoR agonists have been shown to increase the specific
binding of [35S]GTP[S] to Gi proteins in
membranes prepared from bovine forebrain (Lorenzen et al.,
1994
). In membranes prepared from CHO cells expressing the recombinant
human A1AdoR, both the A1AdoR agonist (R)-PIA and the allosteric enhancer PD 81,723 increased
[35S]GTP[S] specific binding by almost 2-fold above
base line in the presence of ADA (2 units/ml; n = 3).
The increase in [35S]GTP[S] binding caused by the
allosteric enhancer, however, was attenuated in the presence of the
antagonist CPX, whereas the increase caused by the agonist was not
(fig. 7). As shown in figure 7, in the absence of CPX,
both (R)-PIA and PD 81,723 increased [35S]GTP[S] binding from 100% to ~180%, almost a
2-fold increase. In the presence of CPX (100 nM), the baseline level of
[35S]GTP[S] binding decreased from 100% to ~60%.
Nevertheless, (R)-PIA in the presence of CPX (100 nM)
increased [35S]GTP[S] binding from 60% to 120%, a
2-fold increase (fig. 7A). In contrast to the agonist, PD 81,723 in the
presence of CPX (100 nM) did not significantly (P
.05) increase
[35S]GTP[S] binding above control (fig. 7B).
|
.05) increased
[35S]GTP[S] binding (fig. 8). However, in combination,
the same concentrations of (R)-PIA and PD 81,723 increased
[35S]GTP[S] binding to 170 ± 6% of baseline
(P
.05; fig. 8).
|
Effect of ADA on increases in
[35S]GTP[S] binding caused by adenosine and
PD 81,723.
Adenosine (1 µM) and PD 81,723 (10 µM) increased
[35S]GTP[S] binding (P
.05) to CHO cell
membranes expressing the recombinant human A1AdoR to
131 ± 7% and 167 ± 32% of baseline, respectively (fig.
9; n = 3). However, as shown in figure
9A, in the presence of ADA (
2 units/ml), adenosine (1 µM) failed to
increase [35S]GTP[S] binding above baseline (P
.05). In contrast, the increase in [35S]GTP[S] binding
caused by PD 81,723 was not attenuated by ADA (fig. 9B). As shown in
figure 9B, [35S]GTP[S] binding was 167 ± 32% of
baseline in the presence of PD 81,723 (10 µM) alone and 174 ± 27% of base line in the presence of PD 81,723 (10 µM) and ADA (10 units/ml); both values are significantly greater (P
.05) than
[35S]GTP[S] binding in the absence of PD 81,723 (i.e., control). Thus, ADA abolished the increase in
[35S]GTP[S] binding caused by adenosine but not by PD
81,723.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The allosteric enhancer PD 81,723 has been shown to increase
agonist- but not antagonist-specific binding to A1AdoR in
membranes prepared from various tissues (i.e., heart and
brain) from several different species (i.e., human, guinea
pig, rat and dog), including recombinant human A1AdoRs
(Bhattacharya and Linden, 1995
; Bruns and Fergus, 1990
; Kollias-Baker
et al., 1994a
). Consistent with these findings, in the
current study PD 81,723 increased the maximum specific binding
(Bmax) of the agonist [3H]CHA to
recombinant human A1AdoR in CHO cell membranes (figs. 1 and
2). Also consistent with the results of previous studies, the
Bmax value, as determined with the antagonist
ligand [3H]CPX, was >9-fold higher than the value as
determined with the agonist ligand [3H]CHA in the absence
of PD 81,723 (Kollias-Baker et al., 1994a
). This difference
reflects the fact that the antagonist [3H]CPX labels the
total population of A1AdoR, whereas the agonist [3H]CHA preferentially labels only those receptors in the
agonist high-affinity state.
Similar to the results of radioligand binding studies, the potentiation
of agonist-mediated A1AdoR responses by PD 81,723 is well
described. For example, PD 81,723 has been shown to potentiate the
effect of A1AdoR agonists in isolated guinea pig hearts
(Amoah-Apraku et al., 1993
; Kollias-Baker et al.,
1994a
, 1994b
), rat isolated atria (Mudumbi et al., 1993
) and
rat hippocampal brain slices (Janusz et al., 1991
).
Consistent with these previous findings, in the current study in CHO
cells stably expressing the recombinant human A1AdoR, PD
81,723 acted in synergism with the agonist (R)-PIA to
inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation (fig. 5) and to increase
[35S]GTP[S] binding (fig. 8). Inhibition of
forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation is a measure of
A1AdoR-mediated Gi protein activation (Cooper
et al., 1980
), whereas stimulation of
[35S]GTP[S] binding has been shown to reflect GDP/GTP
exchange that leads to Gi protein activation (Gilman, 1987
;
Lorenzen et al., 1994
).
An important finding of this study was that PD 81,723 alone, in the
absence of an agonist and in a concentration-dependent manner,
inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation (fig. 3) and increased
[35S]GTP[S] binding (fig. 7). These apparent
agonist-independent effects of PD 81,723 have not been reported in
preparations from studies evaluating the actions of this allosteric
enhancer on A1AdoR expressed in native tissues, such as the
isolated guinea pig heart and rat hippocampal brain tissue (Janusz
et al., 1991
; Kollias-Baker et al., 1994b
). These
results are consistent, however, with those of two previous studies in
which PD 81,723 appeared to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP
accumulation in cultured FRTL-5 cells (Bruns and Fergus, 1990
) and in
CHO cells stably expressing the recombinant human A1AdoR
(Bhattacharya and Linden, 1995
). The increase in
[35S]GTP[S] binding mediated by PD 81,723 has not been
previously reported.
There are several possible explanations for these apparent
agonist-independent effects of PD 81,723. First, it is possible that
the allosteric enhancer mediates these effects by binding to the
agonist binding site of A1AdoR. The results of competition binding studies, however, demonstrated that none of the concentrations of PD 81,723 (1 pM to 100 µM) used in these studies significantly inhibited agonist binding to recombinant human A1AdoR. The
specific binding of the agonist [3H]CHA increased as the
concentration of PD 81,723 was raised from 0.1 to 10 µM and then fell
when the concentration of PD 81,723 was increased further (fig. 2A).
Unlike the effect of PD 81,723 on agonist binding, the allosteric
enhancer did not increase the binding of the antagonist, and at a
concentration of >50 µM, the specific binding of
[3H]CPX decreased (fig. 2B). These results are consistent
with previous reports indicating that the effect of PD 81,723 on
agonist binding is biphasic, increasing agonist binding at lower
concentrations but decreasing binding at higher concentrations (Bruns
and Fergus, 1990
). In contrast to the allosteric enhancer PD 81,723, the A1AdoR agonist (R)-PIA decreased the
specific binding of both [3H]CHA and
[3H]CPX in a concentration-dependent manner with
Ki values of 7.7 ± 2.2 and 820 ± 104 nM, respectively. The higher potency of the agonist (R)-PIA
to compete with [3H]CHA, as opposed to
[3H]CPX, for binding to A1AdoR in CHO cell
membranes is due to the preferential binding of agonist to the
high-affinity state of the receptor. Altogether, these results strongly
support the conclusion that in CHO cells stably expressing the
recombinant human A1AdoR, the effects of PD 81,723 alone
(i.e., in the absence of an agonist) at concentrations of
<100 µM are not due to the binding of PD 81,723 to agonist binding
sites on A1AdoR.
A second possible explanation for the apparent agonist-independent effects of PD 81,723 is that the allosteric enhancer potentiates the action of endogenous adenosine present in the media. Therefore, to investigate this possibility, we sought to eliminate or reduce these effects of PD 81,723 using ADA to degrade adenosine present in the incubation media. In the presence of ADA, adenosine-mediated inhibition of cAMP accumulation (fig. 4A) and stimulation of [35S]GTP[S] binding (fig. 9A) were attenuated. In contrast, neither the inhibition of cAMP accumulation (fig. 4B) nor the stimulation of [35S]GTP[S] binding (fig. 9B) caused by PD 81,723 was attenuated by ADA at a concentration 5-fold higher than that required to attenuate the actions of the exogenous adenosine. Therefore, these results indicate that if the agonist-independent effect of PD 81,723 was due to potentiation of the action of endogenous adenosine, the concentration of adenosine in the media would have to be >1 µM in the cAMP assays and >0.5 µM in the [35S]GTP[S] assays in this study. Because these high concentrations of endogenous adenosine are unlikely, the results support the conclusion that the effects of PD 81,723 on forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation and [35S]GTP[S] binding are not mediated through the enhancement of the action of endogenous adenosine.
The results of the experiments provide substantial evidence that the
agonist-independent effects of the allosteric enhancer observed in this
study are neither mediated by the binding of PD 81,723 to the agonist
binding site of the A1AdoR nor due to the potentiation by
PD 81,723 of the actions of endogenous adenosine. The explanation for
this unique effect of the allosteric enhancer may involve the
overexpression of A1AdoR in this CHO cell line compared
with the normal physiological level of receptor expression. For
example, the results of saturation binding experiments using the
A1AdoR antagonist [3H]CPX show that guinea
pig forebrain tissue and these CHO cell membranes express ~3000
(Kollias-Baker et al., 1994a
) and 10,000 fmol/mg of protein
of A1AdoR binding, respectively. Thus, the level of
A1AdoR expression in the CHO cells is >3-fold higher than
in guinea pig forebrain tissue. In other receptor systems (e.g., beta-2 adrenergic system), it has been
hypothesized that a higher level of receptor expression increases the
number of receptors coupled to G proteins, thereby permitting the
detection of constitutive receptor activity (Bond et al.,
1995
; Lefkowitz et al., 1993
; Milligan et al.,
1995
).
There is evidence in the results of our studies that A1AdoR expressed in these CHO cells exhibits constitutive receptor activity. The cellular cAMP accumulation in nontransfected cells was >2-fold higher than that in cells expressing the recombinant human A1AdoR. In addition, the A1AdoR antagonist CPX significantly increased cellular cAMP in CHO cells expressing recombinant A1AdoR but had no effect on cAMP accumulation in nontransfected cells (fig. 6). Consistent with these findings, baseline [35S]GTP[S] binding to CHO cell membranes expressing the recombinant human A1AdoR was significantly decreased by the A1AdoR antagonist CPX (fig. 7). Together, the results imply that in these cells, in the absence of an agonist, a significant number of A1AdoRs are coupled to Gi proteins. CPX, acting as an inverse agonist, inhibits this constitutive receptor activity.
We hypothesize that the overexpression of A1AdoR in the CHO
cells studied has enabled us to detect constitutive A1AdoR
activity. PD 81,723 may potentiate the constitutive receptor activity
by promoting isomerization of the A1AdoR to an active state
of conformation. This explanation is in keeping with the idea that the
fraction of receptors capable of interacting with G proteins in the
absence of an agonist is dependent on a process of isomerization of
receptors from an inactive to an active state that is governed by an
equilibrium constant (Lefkowitz et al., 1993
). Consistent
with this theory, PD 81,723 has been shown to increase the fraction of
A1AdoRs coupled to Gi proteins (Bhattacharya
and Linden, 1995
; Kollias-Baker et al., 1994a
) and the
binding of [35S]GTP[S] CHO cell membranes (fig. 7).
In summary, the results of this study show that in CHO cells stably expressing the recombinant human A1AdoR, the allosteric enhancer PD 81,723 alone, in the absence of an agonist, can attenuate forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation and increase [35S]GTP[S] binding. More importantly, these findings indicate that the allosteric enhancer does not mediate these effects by either binding to the agonist binding site of the A1AdoR or enhancing the action of endogenous adenosine present in the incubation media. These agonist-independent effects of PD 81,723 observed in CHO cells stably expressing the recombinant human A1AdoR may be due to enhancement of constitutive receptor activity.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication January 27, 1997.
Received for publication December 12, 1996.
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HL-50488 (L.B.) and a postdoctoral fellowship from the American Heart Association, Florida Affiliate (C.A.K.-B.).
2 Current address: School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, CVDLS, P.O. Box 1770, Davis, CA 95617.
Send reprint requests to: L. Belardinelli, M.D., University of Florida, Department of Medicine, P.O. Box 100277, Gainesville, FL 32610.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
PD 81, 723,
(2-amino-4,5-dimethyl-3-thienyl)-[3-(trifluromethyl)phenyl]methanone;
cAMP, adenosine-3
,5
-cyclic monophosphate;
ADA, adenosine deaminase;
GTP
S, guanosine-5
-O-(3-thiotriphosphate);
GDP, guanosine-5
-diphosphate;
CPX, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine, CPA,
N6-cyclopentyl adenosine;
(R)-PIA, (R)-N6-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine;
CHA, N6-cyclohexyladenosine;
HBSS, Hanks' balanced salt
solution;
[3H]CPX, 8-[dipropyl-2,3-3H(N)]cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine;
[3H]CHA, N6-[adenine-2,8-3H]cyclohexyladenosine;
[35S]GTP[S], [35S]-5
-(
-thio)triphosphate;
[3H]cAMP, [2,8-3H]adenosine-3
,5
-cyclic phosphate;
AdoR, adenosine
receptor;
G protein, guanine nucleotide-binding protein;
CHO, Chinese
hamster ovary.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-adrenoreceptor by a partial agonist.
J. Biol. Chem.
260: 15820-15828, 1985
2 adrenoceptor.
Nature
34: 272-215, 1995.
-O-(3- [35S]thio)triphosphate binding.
Mol. Pharmacol.
44: 11-123, 1994.
-subunit expression, myristoylation, and membrane association in COS cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87: 728-732, 1990This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Lee, R. Schwandner, G. Swaminath, J. Weiszmann, M. Cardozo, J. Greenberg, P. Jaeckel, H. Ge, Y. Wang, X. Jiao, et al. Identification and Functional Characterization of Allosteric Agonists for the G Protein-Coupled Receptor FFA2 Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2008; 74(6): 1599 - 1609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Rosenkilde, R. David, I. Oerlecke, T. Benned-Jensen, U. Geumann, A. G. Beck-Sickinger, and T. W. Schwartz Conformational Constraining of Inactive and Active States of a Seven Transmembrane Receptor by Metal Ion Site Engineering in the Extracellular End of Transmembrane Segment V Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2006; 70(6): 1892 - 1901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Murali, X. Cheng, A. Berezov, X. Du, A. Schon, E. Freire, X. Xu, Y. H. Chen, and M. I. Greene Disabling TNF receptor signaling by induced conformational perturbation of tryptophan-107 PNAS, August 2, 2005; 102(31): 10970 - 10975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Figler, R. A. Olsson, and J. Linden Allosteric Enhancers of A1 Adenosine Receptors Increase Receptor-G Protein Coupling and Counteract Guanine Nucleotide Effects on Agonist Binding Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2003; 64(6): 1557 - 1564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Baker, I. P. Hall, and S. J. Hill Agonist Actions of "{beta}-Blockers" Provide Evidence for Two Agonist Activation Sites or Conformations of the Human {beta}1-Adrenoceptor Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2003; 63(6): 1312 - 1321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Christopoulos and T. Kenakin G Protein-Coupled Receptor Allosterism and Complexing Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2002; 54(2): 323 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Zahn, N. Eckstein, C. Trankle, W. Sadee, and K. Mohr Allosteric Modulation of Muscarinic Receptor Signaling: Alcuronium-Induced Conversion of Pilocarpine from an Agonist into an Antagonist J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2002; 301(2): 720 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Hall Modeling the Functional Effects of Allosteric Modulators at Pharmacological Receptors: An Extension of the Two-State Model of Receptor Activation Mol. Pharmacol., April 13, 2001; 58(6): 1412 - 1423. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. Musser, R. V. Mudumbi, J. Liu, R. D. Olson, and R. E. Vestal Adenosine A1 Receptor-Dependent and -Independent Effects of the Allosteric Enhancer PD 81,723 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 1999; 288(2): 446 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Shryock, M. J. Ozeck, and L. Belardinelli Inverse Agonists and Neutral Antagonists of Recombinant Human A1 Adenosine Receptors Stably Expressed in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 1998; 53(5): 886 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||