![]() |
|
|
Vol. 280, Issue 2, 754-760, 1997
CURE: Digestive Diseases Research Center, West Los Angeles VA Medical Center, Department of Medicine and Brain Research Institute, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The influence of central injection of a new corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) antagonist, astressin, {cyclo(30-33)[D-Phe12,Nle21,38,Glu30,Lys33]r/hCRF12-41)}, on exogenous and endogenous CRF-induced gastric ileus and stimulation of bowel discharges was investigated in conscious rats. Intracisternal (ic) CRF (0.6 µg) reduced gastric emptying of a noncaloric solution to 17.1 ± 4.9% compared with 50.1 ± 4.6% in control group injected ic with vehicle. Astressin (1, 3 and 10 µg, ic) dose dependently prevented ic CRF-induced delayed gastric emptying by 33, 100 and 100%, respectively, and had no effect on basal gastric emptying. Abdominal surgery with cecal manipulation (1 min) reduced gastric emptying to 19.8 ± 5.5% 3 hr postsurgery compared with 59.9 ± 5.2% after anesthesia alone plus ic vehicle. Astressin (1, 3 and 10 µg, ic) prevented postoperative gastric ileus by 56, 93 and 92%, respectively. Intracerebroventricular CRF (0.6 µg) and water-avoidance stress stimulated pellet output (number/60 min) to 5 ± 1 and 11 ± 2, respectively, compared with no fecal pellet output after icv vehicle and no exposure to stress. Astressin (3 and 10 µg, icv) blocked exogenous CRF action by 47 and 63%, respectively, and colonic response to stress by 0 and 54%, respectively. These data indicate that astressin injected into the CSF at low doses (1-10 µg) has an antagonistic action against CRF and stress-related alterations of gastrointestinal motor function, without an intrinsic effect in these in vivo systems. Astressin may be a useful tool to explore functional CRF-dependent physiological pathways in specific brain nuclei.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CRF in the brain is recognized as
a key mediator in a wide range of behavioral, neuroendocrine,
autonomic, immunologic and visceral responses to stress (Dunn and
Berridge, 1990
; Morimoto et al., 1993
; Owens and Nemeroff,
1991
; Swanson et al., 1986
). In particular, convergent
reports in rodents indicate that CRF acts within the central nervous
system to elicit similar changes in GI motor functions as those induced
by stress (Taché et al., 1993). Namely, central
administration of CRF inhibits gastric motility and emptying, and
accelerates colonic motility and transit and fecal pellet output in
rodents (Heymann-Mönnikes et al., 1991
; Lenz et
al., 1988a
; Martinez and Buéno, 1991; Mönnikes et
al., 1992
, 1993
, a and b, 1994; Sheldon et al., 1990
;
Taché et al., 1987; Williams et al., 1987
).
These effects are mediated through the interaction with CRF receptors,
because central administration of specific CRF antagonists blocked CRF
action (Gué et al., 1991; Lenz et al., 1988b
;
Sütó et al., 1994; Taché et al.,
1991; Williams et al., 1987
). Similarly, a variety of
psychological (aversive stimuli), physical (surgery, restraint),
immunological (interleukin-1
) or chemical (anesthesia) stressors
inhibit gastric motor function and/or accelerate colonic transit and
these effects can be blunted or blocked by the central administration
of CRF antagonists (Bonaz and Taché, 1994
; Gué et
al., 1991; Fargeas et al., 1993
; Hernandez et
al., 1993
; Lenz et al., 1988b
; Mönnikes et
al., 1992
, 1993
, a and b; Sütó et al.,
1994; Taché et al., 1991; Williams et al.,
1987
). Therefore the availability of specific and potent CRF
antagonists provide valuable tools to elucidate the role of endogenous
brain CRF in stress-related alterations of GI motor functions.
To date, two generations of CRF analogs with antagonistic
activity have been developed,
-helical CRF9-41,
[Met18,Lys23,Glu27,29,40,Ala32,41,Leu33,36,38]r/hCRF9-41,
and more recently, the constrained D-Phe CRF12-41 analog, [D-Phe12,Nle21,38,
C
MeLeu37]r/hCRF12-41 (Fisher
et al., 1991
; Gulyas et al., 1995
; Hernandez
et al., 1993
; Menzaghi et al., 1994
). These
peptides, particularly
-helical CRF9-41, have been used
extensively in vivo to assess the physiological role of CRF
in endocrine, autonomic and behavioral responses to various stressors
as well as stress-related changes in GI functions (Brown et
al., 1986
; Fisher et al., 1991
; Hernandez et
al., 1993
; Menzaghi et al., 1994
; Rivier et
al., 1984
; Taché et al., 1993; Tazi et
al., 1987
). However, they display some limitations due to their
poor solubility, persistence of intrinsic activity, and weak potency at
the hypophyseal site of action (Fisher et al., 1991
; Gulyas
et al., 1995
; Menzaghi et al., 1994
). Recently,
further search in achieving conformational stability of CRF
antagonists resulted in the development of astressin, cyclo(30-33)[D-Phe12,Nle21,38,Glu30,Lys33]r/hCRF12-41
(Gulyas et al., 1995
). Astressin's main characteristics are
its low intrinsic activity, high solubility in aqueous solutions, increased metabolic stability and high affinity to both
CRF1 and CRF2 receptor subtypes (Gulyas
et al., 1995
; Perrin et al., 1995
). A recent
report indicates that astressin displays about 32% and 100% higher
potency compared with D-Phe CRF12-41 and
-helical CRF12-41, respectively, to inhibit ACTH secretion from
pituitary cell culture in vitro (Gulyas et al.,
1995
). Moreover, the same study shows that after peripheral
administration in rats, astressin is >10 times more potent than any
other CRF antagonists reported to date to inhibit stress-induced
increase in ACTH plasma levels (Gulyas et al., 1995
).
The antagonistic activity of astressin at a central level, on stress-related alterations of the GI function has not been determined. Therefore, our study was designed to characterize the ability of the new CRF antagonist, astressin, injected into the CSF to block established changes in gastric emptying and bowel discharges induced by CSF injection of CRF and physical (surgery) or psychological (water avoidance) stress. In addition, possible intrinsic activity of CSF injection of astressin on these parameters was also tested.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals
Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan, San Diego, CA) weighing 250 to 280 g were maintained at a 12:12-hr light-dark-cycle, under conditions of controlled temperature (21-23°C). Animals were housed in group cages with food (Purina Rat Chow, St. Louis, MO) and tap water ad libitum. Experiments on gastric emptying were performed in 18 to 20 hr fasted rats with free access to water up to the beginning of treatments. In studies on colonic discharges, rats were not deprived of food and water before the treatments.
Peptides
Rat/humanCRF and astressin were synthesized using the
solid-phase approach and the tert-butoxycarbonyl strategy and were
purified as previously described (Gulyas et al., 1995
).
Peptides were kept in powder form at -70°C and dissolved immediately
before the experiments. CRF was dissolved in sterile saline and
astressin in double-distilled water (adjusted to pH 7.0, warmed to
37°C).
Measurement of Gastric Emptying
Gastric emptying was determined by the phenol red method as
previously described (Barquist et al., 1996
; Taché
et al., 1987). A suspension of continuously stirred 1.5%
methyl cellulose (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO) and phenol red
(0.5%, Sigma) was given intragastrically (1.5 ml) to conscious rats.
After a 20-min period, rats were euthanized by CO2
inhalation. The abdominal cavity was opened, and the gastroesophageal
junction and the pylorus clamped, then the stomach was removed, rinsed
in 0.9% saline and placed in 100 ml of 0.1 N NaOH and homogenized
(Polytron, Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, NY). The suspension was
allowed to settle for 1 hr at room temperature and 5 ml of the
supernatant were added to 0.5 ml of 20% trichloroacetic acid (w/v) and
then centrifuged at 3000 rpm at 4°C for 20 min. The supernatant was
mixed with 4 ml of 0.5 N NaOH, and the absorbance of the sample read at
560 nm (Shimazu 260 Spectrophotometer, Cole Scientific Inc., Moorpark,
CA). Phenol red recovered from animals euthanized immediately after the
administration of the methyl-cellulose solution was used as standards
(0% emptying). Percent emptying in the 20-min period was calculated
according to the following equation: % emptying= (1
absorbance
of test sample/absorbance of standard) × 100.
CSF Injections
Intracerebroventricular. Animals were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine hydrochloride (75 mg/kg, i.p.; Ketaset, Fort Dodge Laboratories Inc., Fort Dodge, IA) and xylazine (5 mg/kg, i.p.; Rompun, Mobay Corporation, Shawnee, KS). A chronic guide cannula (22 ga, Plastic One Products, Roanoke, VA) was implanted into the right lateral brain ventricle according to coordinates obtained from Paxinos and Watson (Paxinos and Watson, 1986) (mm from bregma: antero-posterior, -0.8; lateral, -1.5; dorsoventral, -3.5). The guide cannula was maintained in place by dental cement anchored by four stainless steel jewelry screws fixed to the skull. After the surgery, animals were housed individually with direct bedding. Experiments were performed in conscious, nonfasted animals, starting 7 days after the icv cannulation. During this time, rats were habituated to the manipulation of the cannula and were handled daily for a period of about 5 min. Intracerebroventricular injections were performed in conscious lightly restrained animals. A 28 ga cannula, 1 mm longer than the guide cannula, was connected to a 50 µl Hamilton syringe by a PE-50 catheter (Intramedic Polyethylene Tubing, Clay Adams, Sparks, MD) filled with distilled water. A small air bubble (1 µl) was drawn at the distal end of the PE-50 catheter to separate the injected solution from the water and for visual inspection of the icv injection, performed slowly over a 30- to 45-sec period. At the end of the experiments, animals were euthanized by CO2 inhalation, followed by decapitation and the correct location of the cannula into the lateral ventricle was verified by injecting 10 µl of dye (0.1% toluidine blue). Visualization of dye on the wall of the lateral ventricle indicated correct icv injections.
Intracisternal. Intracisternal injections were performed acutely under short enflurane anesthesia (2-3 min) by puncture of the occipital membrane with the needle of a 50-µl Hamilton syringe, in rats placed in ear bars of stereotaxic equipment. The presence of CSF in the Hamilton syringe upon aspiration before injection insured correctness of needle placement into the cisterna magna.
Experimental Procedures
Intracisternal CRF-induced inhibition of gastric emptying. Under short enflurane anesthesia either astressin (1, 3 or 10 µg/rat in 5 µl) or vehicle (5 µl) was injected ic immediately before the ic injection of either CRF (0.6 µg/rat in 5 µl) or vehicle (5 µl) in fasted rats. The ic dose of CRF was selected to produce a 60 to 70% inhibition of gastric emptying when dose response studies were performed under the same experimental conditions (Taché et al., 1987). After ic injections, animals were returned to their home cages and 10 min later, the marker used for the measurement of gastric emptying of noncaloric liquid meal was administered per orogastric gavage in awake rats, lightly restrained. The rate of gastric emptying was determined 20 min after the administration of the marker.
Abdominal surgery-induced inhibition of gastric emptying.
Under 10-min exposure of enflurane anesthesia (5.5% vapor
concentration in O2; Ethrane-Anaquest, Madison, WI) either
vehicle (10 µl) or astressin (1, 3 or 10 µg/rat in 10 µl) was
injected ic and abdominal surgery with cecal manipulation was performed as previously described (Barquist et al., 1996
; Hernandez
et al., 1993
). Abdominal surgery consisted of a medial
celiotomy (3-4 cm) and cecal exteriorization with cecal handling for a
period of 1 min in gauze soaked with saline. The cecum was then
returned to the abdominal cavity. The linea alba and the skin were
closed separately with 3-0 silk sutures. The 20-min rate of gastric
emptying was measured at 160 min after the completion of abdominal
surgery.
Intracerebroventricular CRF-induced fecal pellet output. Either vehicle (5 µl) or astressin (3, 10 µg/rat in 5 µl) was injected icv in conscious, fed rats with chronic icv cannula. The animals were returned to their home cages and 10 min later a second icv injection of either vehicle (5 µl) or CRF (0.6 µg/rat in 5 µl) was performed. Animals were returned to their home cages and the number of pellets excreted during the next 60 min was counted at 15 min intervals. The animals were used four to five times, allowing a period of at least 4 days between consecutive experiments. None of the animals received the same treatment more than once.
Psychological stress-induced fecal pellet output.
Rats
implanted with chronic icv cannulae were injected with either vehicle
(10 µl) or astressin (3, 10 µg/rat in 10 µl) and returned to
their home cages. Ten min later, animals were subjected to a session of
water-avoidance stress for a period of 60 min, as previously described
(Bonaz and Taché, 1994; Mönnikes et al., 1993b
).
Rats were put individually on a plastic platform (8 × 6 × 6 cm) placed in the middle of a home cage filled with water up to 7 cm of
the height of the platform. To avoid direct contact with the water,
rats stand on the platform for the 1-hr experimental period. Control
animals received the same icv injection but were maintained in a
similar cage without water for 1 hr. Fecal pellet output was counted
every 15 min for 1 hr. Due to the habituation of animals to the stress
stimuli, they were exposed only twice to the water avoidance stress at
a 4- to 5-day interval between the two sessions of stress.
Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as mean ± S.E. Comparisons between groups were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by a Student-Newman-Keuls multiple-comparison test. P < .05 were considered statistically significant.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intracisternal CRF-induced inhibition of gastric emptying.
In
rats receiving ic injections twice with vehicles, the 20-min rate of
gastric emptying of a noncaloric solution was 50.1 ± 4.6%
(n = 11). The ic injection of vehicle followed by CRF
(0.6 µg/rat) inhibited the rate of gastric emptying by 66% compared with the control group [17.1 ± 4.9%, n = 7, P < .01 vs. vehicle + vehicle group; ANOVA:
F(6,36)=4.113, P = .003] (fig. 1). The ic
injection of the CRF antagonist, astressin (1 or 3 µg/rat) immediately before the injection of CRF dose-dependently prevented gastric stasis induced by ic CRF (the rate of gastric emptying was
28.1 ± 9.2%, n = 5, and 51.1 ± 10.3%,
n = 6, respectively). The dose 10 µg ic produced
similar full reversal of CRF inhibitory action as 3 µg (48.9 ± 8.1%, n = 5) (fig. 1). The antagonist by itself,
either at doses 3 or 10 µg/rat injected ic, had no significant effect
on basal gastric emptying (45.6 ± 3.4%, n = 5 and 45.8 ± 4.8%, n = 4, respectively).
|
Abdominal surgery-induced inhibition of gastric emptying.
In
rats maintained under enflurane anesthesia during 10 min and receiving
ic injections with saline, the rate of gastric emptying at 3 hr
post-anesthesia was 59.0 ± 5.2% (n = 5).
Astressin injected ic at the dose of 3 µg/rat (n = 4)
or 10 µg/rat (n = 3) did not influence basal gastric
emptying 3 hr later (54.5 ± 4.4 and 50.0 ± 2.7%,
respectively). Laparotomy and 1-min cecal manipulation performed under
10 min of enflurane anesthesia in rats receiving ic injections with
vehicle reduced the rate of gastric emptying to 19.8 ± 5.5% at 3 hr postsurgery [n = 6, P < .01 vs ic
vehicle plus enflurane alone; ANOVA: F(5,26)=11.077, P < .0001]
(fig. 2). Astressin injected ic at 1 and 3 µg/rat
dose-dependently prevented abdominal surgery-induced gastric ileus
(rate of gastric emptying was 34.1 ± 6.9%, n = 4, P > .05, and 50.2 ± 3.2%, n = 6, P < .001 vs. vehicle + surgery, respectively) (fig. 2).
Astressin injected ic at 10 µg/rat had a similar reversal effect as 3 µg (46.1 ± 2.4%, n = 4, P < .01 vs. vehicle + surgery) (fig. 2).
|
Intracerebroventricular CRF-induced fecal pellet output.
In
rats injected with vehicles, no pellet output was observed during the
next 60 min (n = 6). Astressin injected ic either at
the dose of 3 or 10 µg did not increase pellet output during the same
period (0 ± 0 and 0 ± 0 pellets/60 min respectively, n = 6 for each dose, P > .05 vs vehicle + vehicle). CRF (0.6 µg/rat) increased the total pellet output (nb/60
min) to 5 ± 1 [n = 6, P < .05 vs. vehicle + vehicle or astressin + vehicle, ANOVA:
F(5,32)=15.151, P < .0001] (fig. 3). Astressin
injected icv at the doses of 3 or 10 µg/rat, 10 min before the
administration of CRF, dose-dependently inhibited the response to CRF
by 46 and 63%, respectively (3 ± 1 and 2 ± 1 respectively,
n = 7 for each dose of astressin, P < .05 vs. vehicle + CRF) (fig. 3).
|
Psychological stress-(water-avoidance) induced fecal pellet
output.
In animals receiving icv injections with vehicle, water
avoidance stress stimulated fecal pellet output (number/60 min, 11 ± 2, n = 6), although in animals, also injected with
vehicle, but maintained in nonstressful conditions, no pellet output
was observed during the same period of time [number/60 min, 0 ± 0, n = 6, P < .001 vs. vehicle + stress, ANOVA: F(5,29)=32.4, P < .0001] (fig. 4).
Astressin (10 µg/rat, icv) blocked water-avoidance stress-induced
pellet output by 56% (number/60 min, 5 ± 1, n = 8, P < .01 vs. vehicle + stress), although the dose of
3 µg had no effect (number/60 min, 12 ± 1, n = 3, P > .05 vs. vehicle + stress). In animals not
subjected to psychological stress astressin, by itself, did not
stimulate fecal pellet output (fig. 4).
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we investigated the influence of the newly
developed CRF antagonist, astressin, (Gulyas et al., 1995
) injected into the CSF to antagonize ic/icv CRF- and stress-induced GI
motor alterations. The sites of delivery of the peptides ic and icv
were based on preferential sites of action of CRF to influence GI motor
function, the dorsal vagal complex to inhibit gastric motility
(Heymann-Mönnikes et al., 1991
) and paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus for CRF-induced stimulation of colonic motor function (Mönnikes et al., 1993b
). In agreement
with the results of previous reports, we showed that CRF injected ic
inhibits gastric emptying of a noncaloric liquid solution in rats
(Sütó et al., 1994; Taché et
al., 1987
; 1991
; Yoneda et al., 1992
). The CRF
antagonist, astressin injected ic blocked ic-CRF induced delay of
gastric emptying in a dose dependent fashion. At 3 µg/rat, astressin
injected ic completely prevented ic CRF-(0.6 µg/rat)-induced 66%
inhibition of gastric emptying while at 1 µg/rat, a partial blockade
(33%) was observed. Previous dose response studies using ic injection
of other CRF antagonists (Hernandez et al., 1993
; Rivier
et al., 1984
) showed that 50 µg of
-helical
CRF9-41 and 20 µg of the D-Phe CRF12-41
analog were required to achieve maximal blockade (85% and 87%
respectively) of ic CRF (0.6 µg)-induced 60-70% inhibition of
gastric emptying of a similar non-caloric solution in rats
(Sütó et al., 1994; Taché et al., 1991) (Table 1). Taken together the present and previous
results suggest that astressin is more potent than
-helical
CRF9-41 and D-Phe CRF12-41 to block ic
CRF-induced delayed gastric emptying in conscious rats. However, no
direct relative potency calculation can be derived since experiments
were performed in different groups of animals and times. Several lines
of evidence (Taché et al., 1993) indicate that gastric
stasis induced by ic CRF is mediated by a central action and not by
leakage of the peptide into the peripheral circulation (Martins
et al., 1996
; Taché et al., 1987). In
particular microinjection studies indicate that CRF acts in the dorsal
motor nucleus of the vagus to inhibit vagally stimulated gastric
motility (Heymann-Mönnikes et al., 1991
).
|
In humans, surgical stress is known to have important GI motor effects
including the induction of gastric stasis (Hocking et al.,
1992
). In animal models, surgical stress also results in similar
gastric motor alterations (Barquist et al., 1996
; Dubois et al., 1973
). In rats, abdominal surgery, consisting of
laparotomy and handling of the cecum under short enflurane anesthesia,
causes gastric ileus which persists for several hours. By contrast, 10 min exposure to enflurane alone or with laparotomy produces a significant inhibitory effect only during the first 30 min postsurgery which is no longer observed 3 hr later (Barquist et
al., 1992b
; 1996
; Ruwart et al., 1979
). Convergent
anatomical and functional data support a role of brain CRF as key
neurotransmitter in the coding of neurocircuitry involved in abdominal
surgery-induced gastric ileus (Barquist et al., 1996
; Bonaz
et al., 1994
; Taché et al., 1991). Firstly,
this surgical procedure induced neuronal activation, as assessed by the
presence of c-fos expression in brain nuclei involved in the
control of autonomic functions and known to contain CRF
immunoreactivity (Barquist et al., 1996
; Bonaz et
al., 1994
; Zittel et al., 1993
). In particular, the
distribution of activated neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the
hypothalamus (PVN) 3 hr after abdominal surgery is congruent with
the visualization of CRF-containing neurons in this area in colchicine
pretreated rats (Barquist et al., 1996
; Swanson et
al., 1986
). Moreover, it has been shown that various stressors, as
well as abdominal surgery, increase hypothalamic CRF synthesis and
release (Giuffre et al., 1988
; Harbuz and Lightman, 1989
;
Plotsky and Vale, 1984
). Secondly, we reported previously that
abdominal surgery-induced gastric ileus measured at 30 min and 3 hr postoperatively is reverted by the prior ic injection of the CRF
antagonists,
-helical CRF9-41 and D-Phe
CRF12-41 (Barquist et al., 1996
; Hernandez
et al., 1993
; Taché et al., 1991). However,
doses of 50 µg/rat of
-helical CRF9-41 and 20 µg/rat of D-Phe CRF12-41 injected ic were necessary to
produce a maximal 60-84% reversal of the gastric stasis at 3 h
after abdominal surgery (Barquist et al., 1996
; Hernandez
et al., 1993
). In the present study, astressin injected ic
at 1 and 3 µg/rat reversed the effect of abdominal surgery by 56 and
93%, compared with animals exposed to enflurane anesthesia for 10 min
and injected ic with the same dose of the antagonist but without
surgery. By contrast, D-Phe CRF12-41 injected ic at 3 µg
was ineffective against abdominal surgery-induced delay of gastric
emptying in our previous studies (Barquist et al., 1996
).
Based on the previous and present results, astressin injected ic
appears to be more potent than ic D-Phe CRF12-41 and
-helical CRF9-41 at inhibiting postoperative gastric ileus as measured 3 hr after abdominal surgery (Table 1).
Central injection of CRF is well established to stimulate colonic
motility, transit and fecal pellet output in conscious rats (Lenz
et al., 1988a
; Martinez and Buéno, 1991;
Mönnikes et al., 1992
; 1993a
; 1993b
; 1994
; Williams
et al., 1987
). Functional data suggests that central
CRF-induced stimulation of colonic motility and transit are mediated by
an action of the peptide in the PVN and/or the locus ceruleus complex
(Bonaz and Taché, 1994
; Mönnikes et al., 1992
;
1993b
; 1994
). CRF injected icv stimulates fecal pellet output in fed
rats, as previously described (Williams et al., 1987
). The
CRF antagonist,
-helical CRF9-41 injected icv at 50 µg/rat blocked water-avoidance and wrapping restraint stress-induced
stimulation of fecal pellet output by 60% while a higher dose (100 µg) did not result in further attenuation of the colonic response
(Bonaz and Taché, 1994
; Williams et al., 1987
) (Table
1). In the present study, astressin injected icv at the doses of 3 and
10 µg/rat blocked icv CRF-induced fecal pellets by 46% and 63%
respectively. However, although astressin injected icv at 3 µg/rat
was partially efficient in blocking bowel discharges induced by icv
CRF, this dose of CRF antagonist did not modify water-avoidance
stress-induced bowel discharges. At the icv dose of 10 µg, astressin
blocked the response to water avoidance stress by 56%. The lower
efficacy of icv astressin in blocking water avoidance stress-compared
with icv CRF-induced bowel discharges may be due to a greater
stimulatory colonic response induced by stress (11 ± 2 pellets)
vs CRF (5 ± 1 pellets) and/or the involvement of multiple
pathways in the response to stress, some of which may be unrelated to
CRF or related to CRF in brain nuclei not accessible to the antagonist
when administered icv.
Astressin injected ic or icv at 3 or 10 µg exhibits no intrinsic
agonist action since the basal rate of gastric emptying was not
modified and there was no bowel discharge in fed rats. In addition,
these results further strengthen previous evidence that central CRF is
not involved in the basal regulation of GI motor function while playing
an important role as a mediator of stress-related alterations of GI
motor function (Taché et al., 1993
).
Previous in vivo studies showed that astressin injected
peripherally exhibited a higher duration of action and a 10 fold higher potency than D-Phe CRF12-41 to block ACTH release induced by stress or adrenalectomy (Gulyas et al., 1995
). Likewise,
dose response curve in previous and present reports indicates that lower doses of astressin injected into the CSF are needed compared with
D-Phe CRF12-41 and
-helical CRF9-41 to
prevent CRF injected into the CSF- and stress-induced gastric stasis
and bowel discharge suggesting a higher potency (Table 1). The enhanced potency of astressin injected into the CSF compared with the previous CRF antagonists is consistent with the higher affinity of the peptide
to CRF receptors compared with previous CRF antagonists (Gulyas
et al., 1995
). In binding assay using cloned human
CRF1 receptors subtype, astressin displays a higher binding
affinity (2 nM) compared with D-Phe CRF12-41 (56 nM) or
-helical CRF9-41 (17 nM) and, unlike previous CRF
antagonists, astressin does not bind to the CRF binding protein (Gulyas
et al., 1995
). Preliminary evidence indicates that these
peptide antagonists also bind with a similar affinity to the
CRF2 receptor subtypes than respectively displayed on
CRF1 receptor subtype (Lovenberg et al., 1995
;
Perrin et al., 1995
;). Therefore, the receptor subtype specificity involved in the central action of CRF to alter GI motor
function cannot be inferred by using astressin or other CRF
antagonists. However, sauvagine shows a higher affinity for CRF2 receptor subtype and a similar affinity for
CRF1 receptor subtype compared with CRF (Lovenberg et
al., 1995
). Likewise, sauvagine is more potent than CRF itself to
inhibit gastric emptying when injected into the CSF (Barquist et
al., 1992a
; Improta, 1991
) suggesting a possible involvement of
CRF2 receptor subtype in CRF- or sauvagine-induced
inhibition of gastric emptying.
In summary, the new CRF antagonist, astressin, injected into the CSF at low doses of 1-10 µg blocked ic CRF- and surgical stress-induced inhibition of gastric emptying and blunted icv CRF- and psychological stress-induced bowel discharges in conscious rats. These results further establish an important role of brain CRF in stress-related alterations of GI motor function and show that astressin may be a useful tool to dissect sites of action of CRF in stress-related GI motor disorders.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication October 30, 1996.
Received for publication June 17, 1996.
1 This work was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Grants DK-33061 (Y.T.), DK-41301 (Center Grant, Animal Core, Y.T.) and DK-26741 (J.R.) and the National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH-00663 (Y.T.).
2 Current address: The Clayton Foundation Laboratories for Peptide Biology, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA.
Send reprint requests to: Dr. Vicente Martínez, Bld 115, Room 203, West Los Angeles VA Medical Center, 11301 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90073.
| |
Abbreviations |
|---|
ACTH, adrenocorticotropin hormone;
ANOVA, analysis of variance;
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid;
CRF, corticotropin-releasing factor;
r/hCRF, rat/human
corticotropin-releasing factor;
ic, intracisternal;
icv, intracerebroventricular;
-helical CRF9-41, [Met18,Lys23,Glu27,29,40,Ala32,41,Leu33,36,38]h/rCRF9-41;
D-Phe CRF12-41, [D-Phe12,Nle21,38,C
MeLeu37]CRF12-41;
GI, gastrointestinal;
PVN, paraventricular nucleus of the
hypothalamus.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
on intestinal motility in rats: Mediation by two mechanisms.
Gastroenterology
104: 377-383, 1993[Medline].
-helical CRF9-41 in three bioassay systems.
Endocrinology
129: 1312-1316, 1991
-endorphin in the surgically stressed rat.
Endocrinology
122: 306-310, 1988
inhibits gastric emptying in rats: Mediation through prostaglandin and corticotropin-releasing factor.
Gastroenterology
106: 1568-1575, 1994[Medline].This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Larauche, G. Gourcerol, L. Wang, K. Pambukchian, S. Brunnhuber, D. W. Adelson, J. Rivier, M. Million, and Y. Tache Cortagine, a CRF1 agonist, induces stresslike alterations of colonic function and visceral hypersensitivity in rodents primarily through peripheral pathways Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, July 1, 2009; 297(1): G215 - G227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Miragaya and R. B. S. Harris Antagonism of corticotrophin-releasing factor receptors in the fourth ventricle modifies responses to mild but not restraint stress Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2008; 295(2): R404 - R416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Czimmer, M. Million, and Y. Tache Urocortin 2 acts centrally to delay gastric emptying through sympathetic pathways while CRF and urocortin 1 inhibitory actions are vagal dependent in rats Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): G511 - G518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y Sagami, Y Shimada, J Tayama, T Nomura, M Satake, Y Endo, T Shoji, K Karahashi, M Hongo, and S Fukudo Effect of a corticotropin releasing hormone receptor antagonist on colonic sensory and motor function in patients with irritable bowel syndrome Gut, July 1, 2004; 53(7): 958 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Martinez, L. Wang, J. Rivier, D. Grigoriadis, and Y. Tache Central CRF, urocortins and stress increase colonic transit via CRF1 receptors while activation of CRF2 receptors delays gastric transit in mice J. Physiol., April 1, 2004; 556(1): 221 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Huang, X. Pang, K. Karalis, and T. C. Theoharides Stress-induced interleukin-6 release in mice is mast cell-dependent and more pronounced in Apolipoprotein E knockout mice Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2003; 59(1): 241 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W Lewis, G. E Hermann, R. C Rogers, and R A. Travagli In vitro and in vivo analysis of the effects of corticotropin releasing factor on rat dorsal vagal complex J. Physiol., August 15, 2002; 543(1): 135 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-C. Chang and M. R. Opp Role of corticotropin-releasing hormone in stressor-induced alterations of sleep in rat Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): R400 - R407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Mertz Role of the brain and sensory pathways in gastrointestinal sensory disorders in humans Gut, July 1, 2002; 51(90001): i29 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kojima, Y. Naruse, N. Iijima, N. Wakabayashi, S. Mitsufuji, Y. Ibata, and M. Tanaka HPA-axis responses during experimental colitis in the rat Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): R1348 - R1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Li, J. Vaughan, P. E. Sawchenko, and W. W. Vale Urocortin III-Immunoreactive Projections in Rat Brain: Partial Overlap with Sites of Type 2 Corticotrophin-Releasing Factor Receptor Expression J. Neurosci., February 1, 2002; 22(3): 991 - 1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kihara, M. Fujimura, I. Yamamoto, E. Itoh, A. Inui, and M. Fujimiya Effects of central and peripheral urocortin on fed and fasted gastroduodenal motor activity in conscious rats Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2001; 280(3): G406 - G419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E A MAYER The neurobiology of stress and gastrointestinal disease Gut, December 1, 2000; 47(6): 861 - 869. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Jones, J Boorman, P Cann, A Forbes, J Gomborone, K Heaton, P Hungin, D Kumar, G Libby, R Spiller, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of the irritable bowel syndrome Gut, November 1, 2000; 47(90002): ii1 - 19. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Inui Cancer Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome: Are Neuropeptides the Key? Cancer Res., September 1, 1999; 59(18): 4493 - 4501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Martínez, J. Rivier, and Y. Taché Peripheral Injection of a New Corticotropin-Releasing Factor (CRF) Antagonist, Astressin, Blocks Peripheral CRF- and Abdominal Surgery-Induced Delayed Gastric Emptying in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 1999; 290(2): 629 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nozu, V. Martinez, J. Rivier, and Y. Tache Peripheral urocortin delays gastric emptying: role of CRF receptor 2 Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, April 1, 1999; 276(4): G867 - G874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Million, Y. Tache, and P. Anton Susceptibility of Lewis and Fischer rats to stress-induced worsening of TNB-colitis: protective role of brain CRF Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, April 1, 1999; 276(4): G1027 - G1036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Singh, W. Boucher, X. Pang, R. Letourneau, D. Seretakis, M. Green, and T. C. Theoharides Potent Mast Cell Degranulation and Vascular Permeability Triggered by Urocortin Through Activation of Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 1999; 288(3): 1349 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F.-C. Chang and M. R. Opp Blockade of corticotropin-releasing hormone receptors reduces spontaneous waking in the rat Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 1998; 275(3): R793 - R802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Martinez, E. Barquist, J. Rivier, and Y. Tache Central CRF inhibits gastric emptying of a nutrient solid meal in rats: the role of CRF2 receptors Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 1998; 274(5): G965 - G970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. MartInez, F. Cuttitta, and Y. Tache Central Action of Adrenomedullin to Inhibit Gastric Emptying in Rats Endocrinology, September 1, 1997; 138(9): 3749 - 3755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V. Coutinho, P. M. Plotsky, M. Sablad, J. C. Miller, H. Zhou, A. I Bayati, J. A. McRoberts, and E. A. Mayer Neonatal maternal separation alters stress-induced responses to viscerosomatic nociceptive stimuli in rat Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): G307 - G316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||