JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacFarlane, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacFarlane, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, J. T.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 99, Issue 2, 226-233, 1950
Copyright © 1950 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


EVALUATION OF CURARIZING DRUGS IN MAN

III. Antagonism to Curarizing Effects of D-Tubocurarine and Decamethylene-Bis(Trimethylammonium Bromide)

D. W. MacFarlane 1, K. R. Unna 1, E. W. Pelikan 1, R. J. Cazort 1, M. S. Sadove 1, and J. T. Nelson 1

1 Departments of Pharmacology and Surgery (Anesthesia), University of Illinois, College of Medicine, Chicago 12, Illinois

Antagonism of neostigmine and C5 to the curarizing action of dTC and C10 was studied in unanesthetized man and on mice. In all experiments, administration of the potential antagonist preceded that of the curarizing agent.

1. Neostigmine (0.75 mgm.) significantly reduced but did not abolish the paralyzing effects of dTC. It also shortened the duration of action of dTC. In mice, it increased significantly both the HD50 and the LD50 of dTC.

2. C5 (50 mgm.) failed to alter significantly the effects of C10 on grip strength and vital capacity in man. The duration of action of C10 remained unchanged. C5 also failed to antagonize the paralyzing effects of C10 in mice as measured by the HD50.

3. C10 in large doses caused excitement in mice. C5 and sodium thiopental were equally effective in increasing the LD50 of C10. This effect of C5 was apparently independent of its ganglionic blocking action, since other blocking agents like TEA failed to exert such an effect.

4. Curarization with dTC almost completely abolished the response to a subsequent injection of C10 in unanesthetized subjects and in patients during surgical anesthesia.

Submitted on March 1, 1950







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1950 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.