JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lehman, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Taube, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lehman, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Taube, H.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 99, Issue 2, 149-162, 1950
Copyright © 1950 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE PHARMACOLOGY OF THIOMERIN

Robert A. Lehman 1, E. E. King 1, and Harry Taube 1

1 Department of Therapeutics, New York University—Bellevue Medical Center, New York, New York

Acute lethal doses in the cat, the isolated cat heart, the rabbit and the mouse determined within a few hours after injection confirm the results previously reported on the basis of electrocardiographic data and indicate that in Thiomerin the acute cardiac action common to other mercurial diuretics has been virtually suppressed.

On the other hand Thiomerin has been found to resemble closely the theophylline-bearing mercurials in most of its pharmacologic properties. The lethal doses over a four- to eight-day period are very similar, although Thiomerin is slightly more toxic. Thiomerin, Mercuzanthin and Mercuhydrin appear to be indistinguishable with respect to chronic toxicity when administered three times a week over a period of one to three months.

The absorption of Thiomerin from muscle is slightly faster than the other mercurials but of essentially the same order of magnitude. More mercury is fixed in the kidney of the rabbit after chronic administration of Thiomerin than after equivalent dosage of the theophylline-bearing mercurials but this is not associated with increased toxicity based on histologic evidence. The course of elimination of mercury and the total recovery of mercury in the urine after administration of Thiomerin in man follow closely the pattern observed with Mercuzanthin and Salyrgan-theophylline.

Submitted on January 13, 1950




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. T. RAY
Mercurial Diuretics: Their Mechanism of Action and Application
Arch Intern Med, December 1, 1958; 102(6): 1016 - 1023.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. F. Lehman, L. P. Barrack, and R. A. Lehman
Reactions of Mercurial Diuretics with Mono- and Dithiols
Science, April 13, 1951; 113(2937): 410 - 412.
[PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1950 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.