JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burnett, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Beecher, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Burnett, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Beecher, H. K.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 96, Issue 4, 380-387, 1949
Copyright © 1949 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ETHER AND CYCLOPROPANE ANESTHESIA ON THE RENAL FUNCTION OF MAN

Charles H. Burnett 1, Esther L. Bloomberg 1, Gerald Shortz 1, David W. Compton 1, and Henry K. Beecher 1

1 Anesthesia Laboratory of the Harvard Medical School at The Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital

1. The renal clearances of mannitol and sodium para-aminohippurate were determined before and during anesthesia. Ether was administered to eight human subjects and cyclopropane to seven.

2. All studies were conducted on patients in good condition with normal renal function as inferred from the usual clinical criteria. All observations were completed before any surgical procedures were started.

3. In seven of the eight patients who received ether, and in all who received cyclopropane, the average glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow fell during anesthesia. The average filtration fraction rose in each patient except in one, who also showed no significant changes in mannitol or para-aminohippurate clearances. Average urine flow fell in both groups, accompanied by a rise in the average U/P ratio. Individual variations in all of these measurements were observed.

4. The changes in kidney function observed during ether and cyclopropane anesthesia were qualitatively similar; quantitatively, they were greater with cyclopropane, and somewhat less subject to individual variation. Thus, average glomerular filtration rate fell 21 pen cent with ether, and 31 per cent with cyclocpropane; average effective renal plasma flow fell 39 per cent with ether and 52 per cent with cyclopropane; average filtration fraction rose 25 per cent with ether and 35 per cent with cyclopropane.

5. Possible reasons for the variation of our data from that of previous workers are presented. Certain physiologic and therapeutic implications of these data are suggested.

Submitted on May 9, 1949







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1949 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.