JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nickerson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nomaguchi, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nickerson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nomaguchi, G. M.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 95, Issue 1, 1-11, 1949
Copyright © 1949 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


MECHANISM OF DIBENAMINE PROTECTION AGAINST CYCLOPROPANE-EPINEPHRINE CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIAS

Mark Nickerson 1 and George M. Nomaguchi 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah

Experiments on dogs under cyclopropane anesthesia indicate that the protection against epinephrine-induced cardiac arrhythmias afforded by Dibenamine and related adrenergic blocking agents is due to two factors:

1. A direct cardiac action which requires larger doses of blocking agent than are necessary to reverse completely the peripheral pressor effect of the injected epinephrine. This protection is largely independent of a transient "quinidine like" action on the myocardium shared by related compounds devoid of adrenergic blocking activity.

2. Prevention of an elevated blood pressure during the period of epinephrine action. Artificial elevation of the blood pressure by occlusion of the thoracic aorta has been shown to act as an added stress capable of producing irregularities in many hearts otherwise protected by Dibenamine. The effects of aortic occlusion were found to be dependent upon the final level of systemic arterial pressure attained and to be largely independent of the magnitude of the rise in pressure. Sustained pressure elevation produces cumulative effects.

The heart was found to be most prone to develop arrhythmias shortly after the injected epinephrine first reaches it rather than at the time of maximum epinephrine rine concentration in the blood stream.

The influence of systemic arterial pressure on the production of cardiac arrhythmias does not appear to be mediated through the vagi.

The development of a relative myocardial hypoxia and the production of some degree of cardiac dilatation are discussed as possible mechanisms by which systemic hypertension might sensitize the myocardium to epinephrine-induced arrhythmias.

Submitted on September 14, 1948




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
W. J. Angenent and G. B. Koelle
The Destruction of Epinephrine by the DOPA-Oxidase System of Ocular Tissue
Science, November 14, 1952; 116(3020): 543 - 544.
[PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. H. Heller, R. B. Setlow, and E. Mylon
Fluorescence of Mixtures of Arterenol, Epinephrine, and Phosphate
Science, July 21, 1950; 112(2899): 88 - 89.
[PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1949 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.