JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, D. F.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 93, Issue 3, 338-345, 1948
Copyright © 1948 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE COMPARATIVE PHARMACOLOGY OF THE CYCLOHEXYLALKYLAMINES

David F. Marsh 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown

2-Phenylethylamine, 2-phenyl-1-propylamine, 1-phenyl-2-propylamine and their N-methyl homologs have been compared with their cyclohexyl analogs. The unsubstituted phenylethylamine is more active as a pressor agent than phenylethyl methylamine, and these are both more active than the corresponding cyclohexylethylamines. Similarly, the phenylpropylamines, though less active than the phenylethylamines, are more active than their cyclohexyl analogs. On isolated smooth muscle, the reverse is true, with the hydrogenated compounds being more relaxant than the aromatic compounds, and the N-methyl homologs being more active than the unsubstituted compounds.

Submitted on March 17, 1948







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1948 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.