JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EMERSON, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by CLARK, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by EMERSON, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by CLARK, D.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 85, Issue 4, 336-342, 1945
Copyright © 1945 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


INDUCTION OF NUTRITIONAL DEFICIENCY BY ORAL ADMINISTRATION OF STREPTOMYCIN

GLADYS A. EMERSON 1, DOROTHY G. SMITH 1, ELIZABETH WURTZ 1, and DOROTHY CLARK 1

1 From the Merck Institute for Therapeutic Research, Rahway, New Jersey

Rats receiving 160,000-375,000 units per kg. of streptomycin in conjunction with a purified diet failed to develop significant nutritional deficiencies although some evidence of toxicity was observed. Rats fed a higher level of the drug, namely 580,000-875,000 units per kg. showed signs similar to those observed in experimental biotin deficiency. Furthermore, the animals responded to biotin therapy. Microbiological analyses indicated a decreased biotin synthesis. Deficiency signs ascribable to a lack of folic acid or vitamin K were not observed.

The change in coliform count, a reduction following a return to normal, was similar to that seen with the sulfonamides; however the degree of depression was much greater. The total flora was likewise depressed with streptomycin which was not the case with succinylsulfathiazole. These findings would seem to indicate that for the temporary sterilization of the gastro-intestinal tract streptomycin might be more effective than succinylsulfathiazole.

Submitted on September 6, 1945







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1945 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.