JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de BODO, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by PRESCOTT, K. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by de BODO, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by PRESCOTT, K. F.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 85, Issue 3, 222-233, 1945
Copyright © 1945 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE ANTIDIURETIC ACTION OF BARBITURATES (PHENOBARBITAL, AMYTAL, PENTOBARBITAL) AND THE MECHANISM INVOLVED IN THIS ACTION

R. C. de BODO 1 and K. F. PRESCOTT 1

1 Department of Pharmacology, New York University College of Medicine

1. Normal dogs, in the postabsorptive state and in water equilibrium, excreted ingested water (40 cc./kgm.) or intravenously infused water (25 cc./kgm.) almost quantitatively within three hours.

2. Phenobarbital sodium given intravenously in one-half of the anesthetic dose (0.04 gram/kgm.), either 40 minutes after the administration of water by stomach or a few minutes before the intravenous infusion of water was started, inhibited water diuresis in every normal dog studied. The degree of this inhibition was such that the water output during the experimental period was about one-half of the water intake. Phenobarbital in doses smaller than 0.035-0.040 gram/kgm. had no consistent effect on water diuresis.

3. Phenobarbital sodium given intravenously in full anesthetic doses (0.08 gram/kgm.) inhibited water diuresis in normal dogs to a degree not more marked than that produced by the half anesthetic dose.

4. Still larger doses of phenobarbital sodium, causing very deep anesthesia, inhibited water diuresis to a greater degree in normal dogs.

5. In contrast to phenobarbital either amytal sodium or pentobarbital sodium, given intravenously in half anesthetic or even in full anesthetic doses, inhibited water excretion in only some animals. If an antidiuretic action was produced. by either dose of these drugs, it was about of the same degree as that produced by the smallest effective dose of phenobarbital.

6. The effect of repeated administrations of pentobarbital sodium on the water diuresis of an individual normal dog was in some cases the same, but not always so; for instance, dogs which failed to respond with an antidiuretic effect on the first or first and second occasions gave an antidiuretic response at a later time, whereas sometimes the first and third administrations produced an antidiuretic response and the second failed to do so.

7. In dogs in which the entire neurohypophysis (infundibular process,infundibular stem and median eminence) was destroyed and in which, as a result, permanent diabetes insipidus developed, the excretion of water was never inhibited by any of the barbiturates studied even when these drugs were given in full anesthetic doses.

8. In contrast to the above, in dogs in which the usual hypophysectomy was performed, leaving some parts of the neurohypophysis intact, as evidenced by only a transient diabetes insipidus followed by a permanent normal water balance, the barbiturates inhibited water diuresis.

9. Phenobarbital, amytal, and pentobarbital sodium then, inhibited water diuresis in dogs only if some part of the neurohypophysis was functioning.

10. In contrast to its effect on water diuresis in normal dogs, phenobarbital, even in full anesthetic doses, either did not inhibit saline diuresis (isotonic sodium sulfate solution) or inhibited it only in some animals (isotonic sodium chloride solution).

Submitted on July 19, 1945




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. D. M. Cabral, D. R. Kapusta, V. A. Kenigs, and K. J. Varner
Central alpha 2-receptor mechanisms contribute to enhanced renal responses during ketamine-xylazine anesthesia
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 1998; 275(6): R1867 - R1874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
A. M. Cabral, K. J. Varner, and D. R. Kapusta
Renal Excretory Responses Produced by Central Administration of Opioid Agonists in Ketamine and Xylazine-Anesthetized Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 1997; 282(2): 609 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
M. R. Schoenfeld
Acute Pulmonary Edema Caused by Barbiturate Poisoning: A Consideration of Its Genesis and Therapy
Angiology, October 1, 1964; 15(10): 445 - 453.
[PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1945 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.