JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by UNGAR, J.
Right arrow Articles by ROBINSON, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by UNGAR, J.
Right arrow Articles by ROBINSON, F. A.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 80, Issue 3, 217-232, 1944
Copyright © 1944 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


INVESTIGATION OF THE ANTIBACTERIAL AND TOXIC ACTION OF CERTAIN ACRIDINE DERIVATIVES

J. UNGAR M.D., L.R.C.P., M.R.C.S.1 and F. A. ROBINSON M.Sc. TECH., F.I.C.1

1 Glaxo Laboratories Ltd., Greenford, Middlesex

1. 2:7-Diaminoacridine monohydrochloride and 5-aminoacridine hydrochloride are active in high dilutions against gram-positive cocci (streptococcus, pneumococcus, staphylococcus) and spore-bearing anaerobes and in lower dilutions against gram-positive and gram-negative bacilli. The presence of blood and serum decreases the activity of both compounds to some extent. They do not neutralise toxin in vitro.

2. Whilst acriflavine is more rapid than 2:7-diaminoacridine monohydrochloride in its bactericidal effect against staphylococcus, it is slower against B. coli and B. proteus. 5-Aminoacridine hydrochloride is the least rapid of the three compounds.

3. In serum, 2:7-diaminoacridine monohydrochloride kills staphylococcus more quickly than do 5-aminoacridine hydrochloride and proflavine; the three compounds are approximately equally effective against B. coli. The salts are in general more rapid in their action than the corresponding bases.

4. 2:7-Diaminoacridine monohydrochloride has a lower, and 5-aminoacridine hydrochloride a higher, systemic toxicity than proflavine, but both compounds are less toxic to tissues than proflavine and acriflavine. The action of the bases on tissues was similar to that of the corresponding salts.

5. The 2:7-compound interfered least with the healing of artificial wounds, whilst the 5-amino-compound was also less harmful than proflavine or acriflavine. The order in which the compounds slowed down the rate of healing was the same whether the substances were applied in solution or in powder form.

Submitted on August 30, 1943







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1944 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.