JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TORDA, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by TORDA, C.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 77, Issue 4, 350-356, 1943
Copyright © 1943 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


EFFECT OF CHLOROFORM AND ETHER ON THE SENSITIVITY OF MUSCLE TO ACETYLCHOLINE

CLARA TORDA 1

1 From the Department of Pharmacology, Cornell University Medical College, New York

1. The effect of chloroform and ether on the response of the rectus abdominis muscle of frog to acetylcholine was investigated.

2. These drugs in low concentrations increase the response of the muscle to acetylcholine (chloroform from 0.0025 to 0.03 cc. per cent; ether from 0.5 to 1.5 cc. per cent).

3. Higher concentrations decrease the response of the muscle to acetylcholine (chloroform from 0.03 cc. per cent; ether from 1.5 cc. per cent).

4. Still higher concentrations cause contracture (chloroform from 0.16 cc. per cent; ether more than 3.7 cc. per cent).

5. Physostigmine potentiates the response of deeply chloroformed muscles to acetylcholine.

6. Chloroform and ether potentiate the response of fully eserinized muscles to acetylcholine.

7. Chloroform and ether even in high concentration are not able to counteract the effect of atropine in inhibiting the effect of acetylcholine.

8. Atropine does not modify chloroform and ether contracture.

9. These results indicate that chloroform and ether increase the excitability of the parasympathetic nervous system both by inhibiting the destruction of acetylcholine by choline esterase and by increasing the sensitivity of the effector organs to acetylcholine.

10. The contracture caused by chloroform and ether is probably the result of processes which do not involve acetylcholine.

11. The difference in the parasympathetic effects of chloroform and ether during anesthesia may be explained by the difference in concentrations required to stimulate the parasympathetic nervous system and the relative lethal concentrations in the tissues.

Submitted on January 5, 1943







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1943 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.