JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRAHAM, J. D. P.
Right arrow Articles by GURD, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GRAHAM, J. D. P.
Right arrow Articles by GURD, M. R.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 72, Issue 1, 48-62, 1941
Copyright © 1941 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


A COMPARISON OF EPHEDRINE AND ESERINE

J. D. P. GRAHAM 1 and M. R. GURD 1

1 From the Nuffield Institute for Medical Research, Oxford

1. The effects of various concentrations of ephedrine and eserine on the actions of adrenaline and acetylcholine respectively were examined in the following preparations under similar conditions: perfused frog heart, cat blood pressure, cat limb volume, perfused rabbit ear, isolated rabbit gut, and cat nictitating membrane.

2. In the first four of these preparations the effects of the two drugs showed a close similarity. Low concentrations of either drug up to about 10–9 were without effect, while concentrations from about 1O–9 to 10–7 produced potentiation, i.e. an increase in the action of the corresponding hormone. At a concentration in the range from 10–7 to 10–6, a transition occurred, the effect being reversed from potentiation to depression, and at higher concentrations the degree of depression became greater, until at about 10–3 the action was completely abolished. These concentration levels were practically identical for the two drugs. The experimental results on isolated rabbit gut and cat nictitating membrane were inconclusive, but as far as they went were in general agreement with the statement above.

3. The action of ephedrine is discussed, and it is concluded that while the close parallelism which exists between the effects of ephedrine and eserine affords some support for the theory that ephedrine acts, in part at least, by inhibiting the enzyme which is responsible for the inactivation of adrenaline, the development of this theory must await further evidence as to the nature and properties of the enzyme.

Submitted on January 20, 1941







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1941 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.