JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WÉGRIA, R.
Right arrow Articles by BROWN, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WÉGRIA, R.
Right arrow Articles by BROWN, B. S.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 71, Issue 4, 336-343, 1941
Copyright © 1941 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE FIBRILLATION THRESHOLD AFTER ADMINISTRATION OF DIGITALIS AND OUABAIN

RENÉ WÉGRIA 1, J. H. GEYER 1, and B. S. BROWN 1

1 From the Department of Physiology, Western Reserve University Medical School, Cleveland, O.

1. As a result of previous investigations, a critical method for determining the sensitivity of the dog ventricles to fibrillation is presented. It consists fundamentally in measuring the strength of a short D.C. stimulus applied in late systole, just sufficient to induce fibrillation.

2. Studied by this method, digitalis and ouabain (g-strophanthin) in doses sufficient to elicit clear signs of action, do not alter significantly Such a fibrillation threshold of the dog ventricles.

3. Since toxic doses of digitalis and ouabain induce spontaneous fibrillation of the ventricles, some other mechanism must be involved. Results are presented which lead to the conclusions (a) that the type of fibrillation induced differs significantly from that caused by electrical currents and coronary occlusion in normal hearts and (b) that its onset and development depend on favorable development of localized blocks and changes in myocardial conductivity and does not require the advent of an effective stimulus during the vulnerable period, as in electrocution and coronary occlusion.

4. The results are of fundamental importance in showing (a) that ventricular fibrillation may result as a consequence of more than one mechanism, and (b) that the slow and somewhat variable progression of the fibrillating process which leads to death from digitalis, is one of the factors which makes dogs unfavorable animals for the bio-assay of digitalis.

Submitted on February 11, 1941







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1941 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.