![]() |
|
|
1 From the Research Institute of Cutaneous Medicine and the Department of Bacteriology and Immunology of Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa.
As shown in table 7 all five of the compounds employed in the treatment of acute brucellosis of mice showed best therapeutic results in the case of the 160 infected with Br. abortus. Of the 160 infected with Br. melitensis, the compounds were much less effective while of the 80 infected with Br. suis, the therapeutic effects were nil insofar as survival was concerned although all appreciably prolonged the lives of the mice and especially in the case of sulfanilamide and sulfapyridine.
In the Br. abortus infections best results were observed with aldanil followed in order by sulfanilamide, neo-prontosil and sulfapyridine.
In the Br. melitensis infections best results were observed with sulfapyridine followed in order by neo-prontosil and aldanil.
In the Br. suis infections best results were observed with sulfanilamide and sulfapyridine followed in order by neo-prontosil and aldanil.
It is apparent, therefore, that sulfanilamide, sulfapyridine, neo-prontosil and aldanil vary in their therapeutic effectiveness in the treatment of acute brucellosis of mice according to the strain of Brucella employed.
According to these results the compounds of choice in the treatment of undulant fever of human beings due to Br. abortus would appear to be aldanil, sulfanilamide, neo-prontosil and sulfapyridine in the order mentioned; for infections due to Br. melitensis, sulfapyridine and neo-prontosil while for those due to Br. suis, sulfanilamide, sulfapyridine, neo-prontosil and aldanil in the order given.
Submitted on December 11, 1939
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. KOLMER PROGRESS IN CHEMOTHERAPY OF BACTERIAL AND OTHER DISEASES: WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE PRONTOSILS, SULFANILAMIDE AND SULFAPYRIDINE Arch Intern Med, April 1, 1940; 65(4): 671 - 743. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||