JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GREEN, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by MORRIS, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GREEN, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by MORRIS, M. L.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 64, Issue 3, 263-270, 1938
Copyright © 1938 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE RENAL EXCRETION OF SULFANILAMIDE IN DOGS

D. F. GREEN 1, J. B. ALLISON 1, and M. L. MORRIS 2

1 Bureau of Biological Research, Rutgers University
2 Raritan Hospital for Animals, Stelton, N. J.

The maximum variation in urea clearance and sulfanilamide clearance on one normal dog on a standard mixed diet and under hospital conditions was established.

The average sulfanilamide clearance was found to be approximately 36 per cent of the average urea clearance and 20 per cent of the average creatinine clearance in this dog with normal renal function. This sulfanilamide/urea clearance ratio varied between 0.24 and 0.48 but was independent of the rate of urine flow. These findings support the conclusion reached by Marshall, Emerson and Cutting that sulfanilamide is excreted in a similar way to urea but is reabsorbed to a greater extent by the tubule.

The sulfanilamide clearance is lowered in general, as the urea clearance is reduced due to kidney damage. The sulfanilamide/urea clearance ratio does not, however, always remain the same as in the normal kidney. In many of the cases presented the ratio increases when there is any lowering in the urea clearance. it is suggested that this ratio, and perhaps other ratios, may be used to indicate kidney damage as well as to give more information concerning kidney function.

It is apparent that dosage should be based upon maintenance of blood sulfanilamide level rather than body weight.

Submitted on March 25, 1938







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1938 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.