JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SLEETH, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by VAN LIERE, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by SLEETH, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by VAN LIERE, E. J.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 63, Issue 1, 65-69, 1938
Copyright © 1938 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF VARIOUS ANESTHETIC AGENTS ON THE EMPTYING TIME OF THE STOMACH

CLARK K. SLEETH 1 and EDWARD J. VAN LIERE 1

1 From the Department of Physiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia

Four normal dogs, previously accustomed to the procedure, were used in this work. The normal emptying time of the stomach of each dog was determined by repeated fluoroscopic examinations, using a standard opaque meal. The effects of six anesthetic agents on gastric emptying time were studied. All were found to prolong gastric emptying time: chloroform by 64 per cent; ether by 40 per cent; nitrous oxide by 15 per cent; ethylene, cyclopropane and divinyl oxide each by about 7 per cent. It is felt that the severe anoxemia (5 per cent oxygen) accompanying the nitrous oxide anesthesia probably explains the longer delay with nitrous oxide than with the other gases.

It is suggested that the data presented may be correlated with previous work quoted in this paper to throw some light on the reason why chloroform and ether are more prone than the other agents to be followed by paralytic ileus.

Finally, it is suggested that the general results obtained raise the question as to whether gastric motility may not be used as a criterion of general bodily response to certain external or environmental agencies.

Submitted on October 11, 1937







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1938 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.