JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MOLITOR, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MOLITOR, H.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 57, Issue 3, 274-288, 1936
Copyright © 1936 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


SOME PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF VINYL ETHER

HANS MOLITOR 1

1 From the Merck Institute of Therapeutic Research, Rahway, New Jersey

1. During a 3-hour anesthesia the lethal dose 50 of vinyl ether is 0.19 cc. (1.71 millimols) per liter of air. This compares with 0.18 cc. (1.80 millimols) per liter of ethyl ether and 0.026 cc. (1.32 millimols) per liter of chloroform under the same experimental conditions.

2. The majority of white mice which survive a 3-hour exposure to vinyl ether die subsequently. No such late deaths are observed under identical conditions in rats. An explanation for these deaths cannot yet be given, since no macroscopic or microscopic changes of the organs have been found.

3. Vinyl ether does not decompose when recirculated through the body.

4. The acute toxicity of pure and of decomposed vinyl ether is about the same. Decomposed vinyl ether is less efficacious as an anesthetic than pure vinyl ether.

5. The difference in rapidity of action between ethyl ether and vinyl ether anesthesia depends upon the experimental conditions. In low anesthetic concentrations, ethyl ether is the quicker acting agent. In higher concentrations, vinyl ether acts more rapidly than ethyl ether.

6. The differences in induction time between ethyl ether and vinyl ether depend largely upon the temperature. They are greatest at low temperatures and smallest at 40°C. Recovery from vinyl ether is always much more rapid than from ethyl ether, regardless of temperature.

Submitted on April 1, 1936







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1936 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.