JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by QUIGLEY, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by HIMMELSBACH, C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by QUIGLEY, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by HIMMELSBACH, C. K.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 50, Issue 4, 425-439, 1934
Copyright © 1934 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


CORRELATION OF VISCERAL AND SOMATIC ACTIVITY FOLLOWING ADMINISTRATION OF HYPNOTICS (A) BARBITAL COMPOUNDS, AND (B) TRIBROMETHANOL (AVERTIN-CRYSTALS AND FLUID)

J. P. QUIGLEY 1, O. W. BARLOW 1, and C. K. HIMMELSBACH 1

1 From the Departments of Physiology and Pharmacology of the School of Medicine, Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

The effect of a range of doses of pentobarbital, amytal and barbital (intravenously administered) on tone and motility of the stomach, ileum and colon has been studied by the balloon method in trained, unanesthetized dogs. The action of barbital has been checked by direct observations using the paraffin bath method. The visceral response has been correlated with the hypnotic action of these compounds.

Motor activity of the gut was depressed in a qualitatively similar manner by each of the barbitals but maximal depression frequently developed most rapidly in the colon and latest in the stomach; complete recovery usually occurred early in the ileum and late in the stomach. With doses of the barbiturates producing equal degrees of hypnosis, gastro-intestinal depression was longest with barbital (1), intermediate with amytal (0.6) and shortest with pentobarbital (0.3).

Expressing the ratio between duration of hypnosis (taken as 1) and persistence of gastro-intestinal depression, pentobarbital, small and medium dosages, is 0.25 to 0.33 and completely anesthetic doses 0.25 to 0.5; amytal, small doses 1 or occasionally more, medium doses 0.5 to 1, maximal doses 0.25 to 1; anesthetic doses of barbital 0.08.

Excitation from barbital and pentobarbital was more frequent after small than with moderate dosages but the maximal dose of amytal produced marked restlessness. The frequency with which excitement or restlessness was observed was in the order amytal > barbital > pentobarbital.

The influence of avertin (crystals and fluid) administered rectally, on gastric, ileal and colonic motor activity of trained, unanesthetized dogs also was studied by the balloon method.

Dosages of avertin having a slight hypnotic action markedly depressed the gastro-intestinal tract (order of depression, stomach > ileum > colon), but the visceral effects persisted only 0.6 to 0.8 times as long as the period of hypnosis.

The somatic depression produced by avertin fluid exceeded that from avertin crystals, in that the maximal effects of the fluid developed somewhat earlier were of greater degree and persisted 1.5 to 2.0 times as long as with the crystals. This indicated that the rate of absorption of an aqueous solution of avertin fluid from the dog's colon equaled or exceeded that of a similar solution of the crystals. The amylene hydrate contained in the fluid may have produced a moderate irritation of the colon.

Submitted on January 17, 1934







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1934 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.