JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WOODS, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by NELSON, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WOODS, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by NELSON, E. E.
Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, Vol. 45, Issue 4, 403-418, 1932
Copyright © 1932 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics


THE EFFECT OF SMALL AMOUNTS OF ERGOTAMINE ON THE CIRCULATORY RESPONSE TO EPINEPHRINE

GERALD G. WOODS 1, VICTOR E. NELSON 1, and ERWIN E. NELSON 1

1 From the Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Materia Medica and Therapeutics, University of Michigan

1. In anesthetized, vagotomized dogs, evidence of splanchnic constriction to small doses of epinephrine (0.00005 to 0.0001 mgm.) intravenously administered, is removed by small doses of ergotamine (0.1 mgm. or less), the exact amount required varying in different animals.

2. After such splanchnic paralysis, there is still a rise in pressure after epinephrine injections, which rise may be somewhat less than, equal to, or actually greater than that seen before ergotamine administration.

3. This rise is believed to be due in part to cardiac stimulation, and in part to va. soconstriction in the skin and mucous membranes, whose vessels are more resistant to ergotamine paralysis than those of the splanchnic region.

4. Doses of ergotamine removing the splanchnic vasoconstriction to doses of epinephrine of the order mentioned above do not prevent cardiac acceleration to the same doses of epinephrine.

5. The belief is expressed that greater emphasis should be placed on the ability of epinephrine to cause a redistribution of the blood, rather than on its ability to produce a rise in blood pressure.

Submitted on December 23, 1931




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. L. POOL, T. J. C. VON STORCH, and W. G. LENNOX
EFFECT OF ERGOTAMINE TARTRATE ON PRESSURE OF CEREBROSPINAL FLUID AND BLOOD DURING MIGRAINE HEADACHE
Arch Intern Med, January 1, 1936; 57(1): 32 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1932 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.