QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jpet.108.147744v1 330/1/352    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Coffield, J. A. Articles by Yan, X. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Coffield, J. A. Articles by Yan, X.

TOXICOLOGY

Neuritogenic Actions of Botulinum Neurotoxin A on Cultured Motor Neurons

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are extremely potent neuromuscular poisons that act through soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) protein cleavage to inhibit neurotransmitter release. The ability of BoNT serotype A (BoNT/A) to eliminate localized transmitter release at extremely low doses is well characterized. In the current study, we investigated the less understood characteristic of BoNT/A to induce nerve outgrowth, sometimes referred to as sprouting. This phenomenon is generally considered a secondary response to the paralytic actions of BoNT/A, and other potential factors that may initiate this sprouting have not been investigated. Alternatively, we hypothesized that BoNT/A induces sprouting through presynaptic receptor activation that is independent of its known intracellular actions on the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment receptor (SNARE) synaptosomal associated protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25). To test this, the effects of BoNT/A application on neurite outgrowth were examined using primary cultures enriched with motor neurons isolated from embryonic mouse spinal cord. In this system, BoNT/A potently stimulated neuritogenesis at concentrations as low as 0.01 nM. The neuritogenic effects of BoNT/A exposure were concentration dependent and antagonized by Triticum vulgaris lectin, a known competitive antagonist of BoNT. Similar results were observed with the isolated BoNT/A binding domain, revealing that neuritogenesis could be initiated solely by the binding actions of BoNT/A. In addition, the presence or absence of SNAP-25 cleavage by BoNT/A was not a determinant factor in BoNT/A-induced neuritogenesis. Collectively, these results suggest that binding of BoNT/A to the motor neuronal membrane activates neuritogenesis through as yet undetermined intracellular pathway(s), independent of its known action on vesicular release.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Julie A. Coffield, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602. E-mail: coffield{at}uga.edu