QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jpet.107.123620v1 322/2/654    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Liu, N.-J. Articles by Gintzler, A. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Liu, N.-J. Articles by Gintzler, A. R.

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY

Sexually Dimorphic Recruitment of Spinal Opioid Analgesic Pathways by the Spinal Application of Morphine

Departments of Biochemistry (N.-J.L., A.R.G.) and Scientific Computing (H.v.G.), State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York

Current evidence for sex-based nociception and antinociception, largely confined to behavioral measures of pain sensitivity, chronic pain syndromes, and analgesic efficacy, provides little mechanistic insights into biological substrates causally associated with sexual dimorphic pain experience. Spinal cord has been shown to be a central nervous system region in which regulation of opioid antinociceptive substrates manifest sexual dimorphism. This site was therefore chosen to explore whether or not differential mechanisms underlie comparable spinal opioid antinociception in male and female rodents. Intrathecal (i.t.) application of morphine to male and female rats produces a thermal antinociception equivalent in magnitude and temporal profile. Nevertheless, it results from the sex-based differential recruitment of spinal analgesic components. As expected, the spinal µ-opioid receptor is critical for i.t. morphine antinociception in both sexes. However, in females, but not males, activation by i.t. morphine of spinal -opioid receptors is a prerequisite for spinal morphine antinociception. Furthermore, in females, but not males, i.t. application of antidynorphin antibodies substantially attenuates the antinociception produced by i.t. morphine. This indicates that the antinociception that results from the i.t. application of morphine in females requires the functional recruitment of spinal dynorphin. Female-specific recruitment by i.t. morphine of a spinal dynorphin/-opioid receptor pathway results from organizational consequences of ovarian sex steroids and not the absence of testicular hormones. These observations suggest that sexual dimorphic pain and analgesic mechanisms might be far more pervasive than commonly thought and underscore the imperative for including female as well as male subjects in all studies of pain and antinociception.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Alan Gintzler, Box 8, Department of Biochemistry, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203. E-mail: alan.gintzler{at}downstate.edu

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. R. Gintzler, S. A. Schnell, D. S. Gupta, N.-J. Liu, and M. W. Wessendorf Relationship of Spinal Dynorphin Neurons to {delta}-Opioid Receptors and Estrogen Receptor {alpha}: Anatomical Basis for Ovarian Sex Steroid Opioid Antinociception J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2008; 326(3): 725 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]