QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jpet.106.109025v1 320/1/354    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leffler, A. Articles by Nau, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Leffler, A. Articles by Nau, C.

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY

Use-Dependent Block by Lidocaine but Not Amitriptyline Is More Pronounced in Tetrodotoxin (TTX)-Resistant Na_v1.8 Than in TTX-Sensitive Na⁺ Channels

Department of Anesthesiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany

The excitability of sensory neurons depends on the expression of various voltage-gated Na⁺ channel isoforms. The tetrodotoxin-resistant (TTXr) Na⁺ channel Na_v1.8 accounts for the electroresponsiveness of nociceptive neurons and contributes to inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Na⁺ channel blockers are clinically employed for chronic pain management, but side effects limit their use. There is conflicting information whether their potency to block tetrodotoxin-sensitive (TTXs) and TTXr Na⁺ channels differs. We analyzed the action of lidocaine and amitriptyline on TTXr Na_v1.8 heterologously expressed in ND7/23 cells in comparison with TTXs Na⁺ channels endogenously expressed in ND7/23 cells. TTXr Na_v1.8 and TTXs currents were investigated under whole-cell voltage-clamp. At a holding potential of –80 mV, lidocaine was 5-fold and amitriptyline 8-fold more potent to tonically block TTXs than Na_v1.8 currents. This was due to a higher percentage of TTXs channels residing in the inactivated, high-affinity state at this potential. Tonic block of either resting or inactivated channels by lidocaine or amitriptyline revealed little differences between TTXs and Na_v1.8 channels. Use-dependent block by amitriptyline was similar in TTXs and Na_v1.8 channels. Surprisingly, use-dependent block by lidocaine was more pronounced in Na_v1.8 than in TTXs channels. This result was confirmed in dorsal root ganglion neurons and is associated with the greater tendency of Na_v1.8 to enter a slow inactivated state. Our data suggest that lidocaine could selectively block Na_v1.8-mediated action potential firing. It is conceivable that the expression pattern of Na⁺ channels in sensory neurons might influence the efficiency of Na⁺ channel blockers used for chronic pain management.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Carla Nau, Department of Anesthesiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Krankenhausstrasse 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany. E-mail: Carla.Nau{at}kfa.imed.uni-erlangen.de

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. R. Strichartz Novel ideas of local anaesthetic actions on various ion channels to ameliorate postoperative pain Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2008; 101(1): 45 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Scroggs Evidence of a physiological role for use-dependent inactivation of NaV1.8 sodium channels J. Physiol., February 15, 2008; 586(4): 923 - 923. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. De Col, K. Messlinger, and R. W. Carr Conduction velocity is regulated by sodium channel inactivation in unmyelinated axons innervating the rat cranial meninges J. Physiol., February 15, 2008; 586(4): 1089 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]