QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jpet.106.113589v1 320/1/218    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baker, J. G. Articles by Hill, S. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Baker, J. G. Articles by Hill, S. J.

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR

A Comparison of the Antagonist Affinities for the G_i- and G_s-Coupled States of the Human Adenosine A1-Receptor

Institute of Cell Signalling, Medical School, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom

The antagonist affinity for a given receptor is traditionally considered to be constant, reflecting the chemical nature of the specific ligand-receptor interaction. However, recent observations with all three -adrenoceptors have cast doubt on this basic pharmacological principle. The extent to which this finding applies to other G protein-coupled receptors and their interaction with different G proteins is unknown. Therefore, we studied the influence of different agonists on antagonist affinity measurements for G_i- and G_s-coupled conformations of the adenosine A1-receptor in Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing the human adenosine A1-receptor and a cAMP-response element (CRE)-secreted placental alkaline phosphatase reporter gene. G_i-coupled inhibition of [³H]cAMP accumulation via the A1-receptor was observed at low concentrations of agonist; however, a small increase in [³H]cAMP accumulation was also seen at higher agonist concentrations. This biphasic response was more evident for A1-stimulated CRE-gene transcription. The inhibitory component was abolished by pretreatment with pertussis toxin, whereas the stimulatory component was augmented, suggesting that the responses were due to an A1-G_i-coupled inhibition followed by an A1-G_s-coupled stimulation. However, the antagonist affinity values measured at the G_i-coupled and G_s-coupled conformations of the receptor were the same in both functional responses and whole-cell binding. Thus, in marked contrast to the -adrenoceptors, the A1-receptor conforms to the long-held principle of pharmacology that antagonist affinity measurements are constant regardless of the response being measured and the competing agonist used to stimulate that response. This was true even when the receptor was shown, in the same assay, to exist in two different conformational states coupled to two different G proteins.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Jillian G. Baker, Institute of Cell Signaling, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. E-mail: jillian.baker{at}nottingham.ac.uk