QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jpet.106.108894v1 319/3/1081    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Iwai, M. Articles by Horiuchi, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Iwai, M. Articles by Horiuchi, M.

ENDOCRINE AND DIABETES

Calcium Channel Blocker Azelnidipine Reduces Glucose Intolerance in Diabetic Mice via Different Mechanism Than Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Olmesartan

Department of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology and Pharmacology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Tohon, Ehime, Japan

The potential combined effect and mechanism of calcium channel blockers (CCB) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB) to improve insulin resistance were investigated in type 2 diabetic KK-Ay mice, focusing on their antioxidative action. Treatment of KK-Ay mice with a CCB, azelnidipine (3 mg/kg/day), or with an ARB, olmesartan (3 mg/kg/day), for 2 weeks lowered the plasma concentrations of glucose and insulin in the fed state, attenuated the increase in plasma glucose in the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and increased 2-[³H]deoxy-D-glucose (2-[³H]DG) uptake into skeletal muscle with the increase in translocation of glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) to the plasma membrane. Both blockers also decreased the in situ superoxide production in skeletal muscle. The decrease in plasma concentrations of glucose and insulin in the fed state and superoxide production in skeletal muscle, as well as GLUT4 translocation to the plasma membrane, after azelnidipine administration was not significantly affected by coadministration of an antioxidant, 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (tempol). However, those changes caused by olmesartan were further improved by tempol. Moreover, olmesartan enhanced the insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 induced in skeletal muscle, whereas azelnidipine did not change it. Coadministration of azelnidipine and olmesartan further decreased the plasma concentrations of glucose and insulin, improved OGTT, and increased 2-[³H]DG uptake in skeletal muscle. These results suggest that azelnidipine improved glucose intolerance mainly through inhibition of oxidative stress and enhanced the inhibitory effects of olmesartan on glucose intolerance, as well as the clinical possibility that the combination of CCB and ARB could be more effective than monotherapy in the treatment of insulin resistance.

Address correspondence to: Masatsugu Horiuchi, Department of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology and Pharmacology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Tohon, Ehime 791-0295, Japan. E-mail: horiuchi{at}m.ehime-u.ac.jp

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Tsukuda, M. Mogi, J.-M. Li, J. Iwanami, L.-J. Min, A. Sakata, T. Fujita, M. Iwai, and M. Horiuchi Diabetes-Associated Cognitive Impairment Is Improved by a Calcium Channel Blocker, Nifedipine Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 528 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-K. Sim, X.-G. Xu, Y.-C. Wong, S.-Z. Sim, and K.-O. Lee Des-Aspartate-Angiotensin I Exerts Hypoglycemic Action via Glucose Transporter-4 Translocation in Type 2 Diabetic KKAy Mice and GK Rats Endocrinology, December 1, 2007; 148(12): 5925 - 5932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]