QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jpet.106.106377v1 319/2/507    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Negus, S. S. Articles by Borsook, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Negus, S. S. Articles by Borsook, D.

PERSPECTIVES IN PHARMACOLOGY

Preclinical Assessment of Candidate Analgesic Drugs: Recent Advances and Future Challenges

Department of Psychiatry, Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research Center (S.S.N.) and Department of Psychiatry, Brain Imaging Center (L.B., D.B.), McLean Hospital, and Department of Radiology, Atinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Engineering, Massachusetts General Hospital (D. B.), Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts; Departments of Pharmacology and Anesthesiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (T.W.V.); Department of Drug Discovery/Analgesics, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania (M.R.B.); and Department of Pharmacology, University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine, Biddeford, Maine (E.J.B.)

In analgesic drug development, preclinical procedures are widely used to assess drug effects on pain-related behaviors. These procedures share two principal components: 1) a manipulation intended to produce a pain-like state in the experimental subject and 2) measurement of behaviors presumably indicative of that pain state. Drugs can then be evaluated for their ability to attenuate pain-related behaviors. In the simplest procedures, the pain state is produced by delivery of an acute noxious stimulus (e.g., a warm thermal stimulus), and the primary dependent measures focus on withdrawal responses or other nocifensive behaviors that increase in rate, frequency, or intensity in response to the noxious stimulus. This approach has been refined in two ways. First, new methods have been developed to induce more clinically relevant pain states. In particular, pain requiring clinical intervention is often associated with inflammation or neuropathy, and novel procedures have emerged to model these conditions and their ability to produce hypersensitive pain states, such as allodynia and hyperalgesia. Second, studies are incorporating a broader array of pain-related behaviors as dependent measures. For example, pain not only stimulates nocifensive behaviors but also suppresses many adaptive behaviors, such as feeding or locomotion. Measures of pain-suppressed behaviors can provide new insights into the behavioral consequences of pain and the effects of candidate analgesics. In addition, functional magnetic resonance imaging has emerged as a noninvasive tool for investigating changes in neural activity associated with pain and analgesia. Integration of these complementary approaches may improve the predictive validity of analgesic drug development.

Address correspondence to: S. Stevens Negus, Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research Center, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 115 Mill St., Belmont, MA 02478-9106. E-mail: negus{at}mclean.harvard.edu