JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on February 17, 2006; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.106.101246


0022-3565/06/3173-1134-1142$20.00
JPET 317:1134-1142, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.106.101246v1
317/3/1134    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dowling, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Challiss, R. A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dowling, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Challiss, R. A. J.

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR

A Single Point Mutation (N514Y) in the Human M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Reveals Differences in the Properties of Antagonists: Evidence for Differential Inverse Agonism

Mark R. Dowling, Jonathon M. Willets, David C. Budd, Steven J. Charlton, Stefan R. Nahorski, and R. A. John Challiss

Department of Cell Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom (M.R.D., J.M.W., D.C.B., S.R.N., R.A.J.C.); and Novartis Horsham Research Centre, Horsham, West Sussex, United Kingdom (M.R.D., D.C.B., S.J.C.)

A single asparagine-to-tyrosine point mutation in the human M muscarinic acetylcholine (mACh) receptor at residue 514 (N514Y) resulted in a marked increase (~300%) in agonist-independent [3H]inositol phosphate ([3H]IPx) accumulation compared with the response observed for the wild-type (WT) receptor. All the antagonists tested were able to inhibit both the WT-M3 and N514YM3 mACh receptor-mediated basal [3H]IPx accumulation in a concentration-dependent manner. However, significant differences in both potency and binding affinity were only seen for those antagonists that possess greater receptor affinity. Despite being transfected with equivalent amounts of cDNA, cells expressed the N514YM3 mACh receptor at levels that were only 25 to 30% of those seen for the WT receptor. Differences in the ability of chronic antagonist exposure to up-regulate N514YM3 mACh receptor expression levels were also seen, with 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine (4-DAMP) producing only 50% of the receptor up-regulation produced by atropine or pirenzepine. Basal phosphorylation of the N514YM3 mACh receptor was approximately 100% greater than that seen for the WT-M3 receptor. The ability of antagonists to decrease basal N514YM3 mACh receptor phosphorylation revealed differences in inverse-agonist efficacy. Atropine, 4-DAMP, and pirenzepine all reduced basal phosphorylation to similar levels, whereas methoctramine, a full inverse agonist with respect to reducing agonist-independent [3H]IPx accumulation, produced no significant attenuation of basal receptor phosphorylation. This study shows that mACh receptor inverse agonists can exhibit differential signaling profiles, which are dependent on the specific pathway investigated, and therefore provides evidence that the molecular mechanism of inverse agonism is likely to be more complex than the stabilization of a single inactive receptor conformation.


Received January 11, 2006; accepted February 16, 2006.

Address correspondence to: R. A. J. Challiss, Department of Cell Physiology and Pharmacology, Maurice Shock Medical Sciences Building, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK. E-mail: jc36{at}leicester.ac.uk







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.