QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jpet.105.099010v1 317/2/882    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Webb, I. C. Articles by Mistlberger, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Webb, I. C. Articles by Mistlberger, R. E.

BEHAVIORAL PHARMACOLOGY

Modafinil [2-[(Diphenylmethyl)sulfinyl]acetamide] and Circadian Rhythms in Syrian Hamsters: Assessment of the Chronobiotic Potential of a Novel Alerting Compound

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

In Syrian hamsters, behavioral procedures for inducing arousal (e.g., running in a novel wheel or gentle handling) can shift circadian rhythms when applied during the usual sleep period ("subjective day") and can attenuate phase shifts to light during the active period ("subjective night"). This raises the possibility that drugs that affect behavioral state may have "chronobiotic" potential. We characterized the effects of modafinil (2-[(diphenylmethyl)sulfinyl]acetamide), an atypical alerting compound, on circadian rhythms in male Syrian hamsters. Electroencephalogram recordings and video observations confirmed that modafinil dose dependently increases wakefulness at the expense of slow-wave and paradoxical sleep with no increase in locomotor activity per unit of time awake. Despite inducing arousal, modafinil at these doses (150 or 300 mg/kg), administered in the subjective day or early or late in the subjective night, did not perturb circadian phase. Modafinil (300 mg/kg) also had no effect on phase shifts to light exposure either early or late in the night and did not alter the size of phase shifts induced by running in a novel wheel for 3 h during the mid-day. Modafinil (300 mg/kg) did, however, decrease by 50% the amount of novel wheel-stimulated running, moving leftward the dose-response relation between wheel revolutions and shift magnitude. These results indicate that, in Syrian hamsters, modafinil alone has no significant chronobiotic efficacy. Nevertheless, this agent may increase the sensitivity of the circadian pacemaker to nonphotic stimuli and may thus have some potential as a tool for promoting clock resetting in combination with behavioral strategies.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Ralph E. Mistlberger, Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6. E-mail: mistlber{at}sfu.ca