![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSORPTION, DISTRIBUTION, METABOLISM, AND EXCRETION
DMPK and Bioanalytical Chemistry (X.-Q.L., L.W., T.B.A.) and Medicinal Chemistry (R.S.), AstraZeneca R&D Mölndal, Mölndal, Sweden; and Division of Molecular Toxicology (T.B.A.), Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
We investigated the enzyme kinetic basis for the stereoselective disposition of R- and S-omeprazole (OME) and racemic OME in human liver microsomes. OME is primarily metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme system (CYP2C19 and 3A4). The metabolism of each enantiomer and pseudoracemic OME was studied using unlabeled and 13C7-labeled enantiomers. The enantiomers inhibited each other's metabolism competitively in human liver microsomes and in recombinant CYP2C19 and 3A4. The results obtained with the individual enantiomers allowed successful prediction of the enzyme kinetics for the pseudoracemate. The intrinsic clearance of each enantiomer in a pseudoracemic mixture remained the same as those of the individually incubated enantiomers, although Km and Vmax decreased. In the pseudoracemate, the relative contribution of CYP2C19 and 3A4 to 5-hydroxylation and 5'-O-demethylation of R-OME was comparable to that obtained for the incubation of R-OME alone. For S-OME, however, the presence of its antipode greatly increased the contribution of CYP3A4, with increasing concentrations, compared with that obtained when incubating S-OME alone. The results of our in vitro study clearly show metabolic interactions between the OME enantiomers, which may also occur in vivo. Because the enantiomers of OME produce similar pharmacological effects, the enantiomer interactions should not significantly affect the pharmacodynamics. On the other hand, the use of the S-enantiomer results in less complex enzyme kinetics than those of the racemate; thus, the outcome of its clinical use is more predictable.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Xue-Qing Li, DMPK and Bioanalytical Chemistry, AstraZeneca R&D Mölndal, S-431 83 Mölndal, Sweden. E-mail: xueqing.li{at}astrazeneca.com
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. S. Foti and J. L. Wahlstrom CYP2C19 Inhibition: The Impact of Substrate Probe Selection on in Vitro Inhibition Profiles Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2008; 36(3): 523 - 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Dennison, D. R. Jones, J. L. Renbarger, and S. D. Hall Effect of CYP3A5 Expression on Vincristine Metabolism with Human Liver Microsomes J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2007; 321(2): 553 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||