JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on December 1, 2004; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.104.078741


0022-3565/05/3123-1314-1320$20.00
JPET 312:1314-1320, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.104.078741v1
312/3/1314    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jutkiewicz, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Traynor, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jutkiewicz, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Traynor, J. R.

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY

Comparison of Peptidic and Nonpeptidic {delta}-Opioid Agonists on Guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTP{gamma}S) Binding in Brain Slices from Sprague-Dawley Rats

Emily M. Jutkiewicz, Nicholas P. Walker, John E. Folk, Kenner C. Rice, Philip S. Portoghese, James H. Woods, and John R. Traynor

Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan (E.M.J., N.P.W., J.H.W., J.R.T.); Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (J.E.F., K.C.R.); and Department of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (P.S.P.)

Previous studies have demonstrated that peptidic and nonpeptidic {delta}-opioid receptor agonists have different effects depending on the measure. For example, nonpeptidic {delta}-opioid agonists, but not peptidic agonists, produce convulsions in rats, and in vitro studies suggested that peptidic and nonpeptidic {delta}-opioid agonists might have differential mechanisms of receptor downregulation. The present study evaluated potential differences between peptidic and nonpeptidic {delta}-opioid agonists in their ability to activate G proteins using guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTP{gamma}S) autoradiography experiments in rat brain slices. The peptidic agonist [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]-enkephalin and the nonpeptidic agonist (+)BW373U86 [(+)-4-[{alpha}(R)-{alpha}-[(2S,5R)-2,5-dimethyl-4-(2-propenyl)-1-piperazinyl]-(3-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide] demonstrated concentration-dependent increases in [35S]GTP{gamma}S binding that were attenuated by the {delta}-opioid antagonist naltrindole. (+)BW373U86 was more potent and efficacious than the peptidic agonist, and this difference remained consistent across brain regions where significant stimulation was observed. In addition, multiple {delta}-opioid compounds were evaluated for their agonist activity in this assay. These data suggested that differences between peptidic and nonpeptidic {delta}-opioid agonists in behavioral studies were most likely caused by differences in agonist efficacy. Finally, these data also revealed that [35S]GTP{gamma}S autoradiography could be used to compare efficacy differences among agonists across various brain regions in rat brain slices.


Received October 1, 2004; accepted November 30, 2004.

Address correspondence to: Dr. John R. Traynor, 1301 Medical Science Research Building 3, Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0632. E-mail: jtraynor{at}umich.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
E. M. Jutkiewicz, M. G. Baladi, J. E. Folk, K. C. Rice, and J. H. Woods
The {delta}-Opioid Receptor Agonist SNC80 [(+)-4-[{alpha}(R)-{alpha}-[(2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl]-(3-methoxybenzyl)-N,N-diethylbenzamide] Synergistically Enhances the Locomotor-Activating Effects of Some Psychomotor Stimulants, but Not Direct Dopamine Agonists, in Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2008; 324(2): 714 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. D. Iordanova, G. P. McNally, and R. F. Westbrook
Opioid Receptors in the Nucleus Accumbens Regulate Attentional Learning in the Blocking Paradigm
J. Neurosci., April 12, 2006; 26(15): 4036 - 4045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
E. M. Peckham and J. R. Traynor
Comparison of the Antinociceptive Response to Morphine and Morphine-Like Compounds in Male and Female Sprague-Dawley Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2006; 316(3): 1195 - 1201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
E. M. Jutkiewicz, S. T. Kaminsky, K. C. Rice, J. R. Traynor, and J. H. Woods
Differential Behavioral Tolerance to the {delta}-Opioid Agonist SNC80 ([(+)-4-[({alpha}R)-{alpha}-[(2S,5R)-2,5-Dimethyl-4-(2-propenyl)-1-piperazinyl]-(3-methoxyphenyl)methyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide) in Sprague-Dawley Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2005; 315(1): 414 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.