JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on August 30, 2004; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.104.073411


0022-3565/05/3121-96-102$20.00
JPET 312:96-102, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.104.073411v1
312/1/96    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Czoty, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Nader, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Czoty, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Nader, M. A.

BEHAVIORAL PHARMACOLOGY

Assessment of the Relative Reinforcing Strength of Cocaine in Socially Housed Monkeys Using a Choice Procedure

Paul W. Czoty, Ciara McCabe, and Michael A. Nader

Center for the Neurobiological Investigation of Drug Abuse, Departments of Physiology and Pharmacology (P.W.C., C.M., M.A.N.) and Radiology (M.A.N.), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Position in the social hierarchy can influence brain dopamine function and cocaine reinforcement in nonhuman primates during early cocaine exposure. With prolonged exposure, however, initial differences in rates of cocaine self-administration between dominant and subordinate monkeys dissipate. The present studies used a choice procedure to assess the relative reinforcing strength of cocaine in group-housed male cynomolgus monkeys with extensive cocaine self-administration histories. Responding was maintained under a concurrent fixed-ratio 50 schedule of food and cocaine (0.003–0.1 mg/kg per injection) presentation. Responding on the cocaine-associated lever increased as a function of cocaine dose in all monkeys. Although response distribution was similar across social rank when saline or relatively low or high cocaine doses were the alternative to food, planned t tests indicated that cocaine choice was significantly greater in subordinate monkeys when choice was between an intermediate dose (0.01 mg/kg) and food. When a between-session progressive-ratio procedure was used to increase response requirements for the preferred reinforcer (either cocaine or food), choice of that reinforcer decreased in all monkeys. The average response requirement that produced a shift in response allocation from the cocaine-associated lever to the food-associated lever was higher in subordinates across cocaine doses, an effect that trended toward significance (p = 0.053). These data indicate that despite an extensive history of cocaine self-administration, most subordinate monkeys were more sensitive to the relative reinforcing strength of cocaine than dominant monkeys.


Received June 28, 2004; accepted August 30, 2004.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Michael A. Nader, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1083. E-mail: mnader{at}wfubmc.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
M. A Nader, P. W Czoty, R. W Gould, and N. V Riddick
Positron emission tomography imaging studies of dopamine receptors in primate models of addiction
Phil Trans R Soc B, October 12, 2008; 363(1507): 3223 - 3232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. A. Nader and P. W. Czoty
PET Imaging of Dopamine D2 Receptors in Monkey Models of Cocaine Abuse: Genetic Predisposition Versus Environmental Modulation
Am J Psychiatry, August 1, 2005; 162(8): 1473 - 1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.