|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of Pharmacology, Gorlaeus Laboratory, Leiden, The Netherlands (K.P.Z., M.D.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Discovery Biology, Sandwich, Kent, United Kingdom (P.H.V., D.N., R.T., N.P.); F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Modeling and Simulation and Biometrics Groups, Basel, Switzerland (K.P.Z., P.J.); and Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands (L.A.P.)
The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) correlations of seven prototypical 5-HT1A agonists were analyzed on the basis of a recently proposed semi-mechanistic PK-PD model for the effect on body temperature. The resulting concentration-effect relationships were subsequently analyzed on the basis of the operational model of agonism to estimate the operational affinity (pKA) and efficacy (log
) at the 5-HT1A receptor in vivo. The values obtained in this manner were compared with estimates of the affinity (pKi) and intrinsic efficacy (log[agonist ratio]) in a receptor-binding assay. Between 5-HT1A agonists wide differences in in vivo affinity and efficacy were observed, with values of the pKA ranging from 5.67 for flesinoxan to 8.63 for WAY-100,635 [N-(2-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl)ethyl)-N-2-pyridinyl-cyclohexanecarboxamide] and of the log
ranging from 1.27 for WAY-100,135 [N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-
-phenyl-1-piperazine-propanamide] to 0.62 for R-(+)-8-hydroxy-2-[di-n-propylamino)tetralin. Poor correlations were observed between the in vivo receptor affinity (pKA) and the affinity estimates in the in vitro receptor binding assay (pKi; r2 = 0.55, P > 0.05), which could in part be explained by differences in blood-brain distribution. In contrast, a highly significant correlation was observed between the efficacy parameters in vivo (log
) and in vitro (log [agonist ratio]; r2 = 0.76, P < 0.05). Thus by combining the previously proposed semi-mechanistic PK-PD model for the effect on body temperature with the operational model of agonism, a full mechanistic PK-PD model for 5-HT1A receptor agonists has been obtained, which is highly predictive of the in vivo intrinsic efficacy.
Address correspondence to: Prof. Meindert Danhof, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of Pharmacology, Gorlaeus Laboratory, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail: M.Danhof{at}LACDR.LeidenUniv.nl
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Yassen, J. Kan, E. Olofsen, E. Suidgeest, A. Dahan, and M. Danhof Mechanism-Based Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of the Respiratory-Depressant Effect of Buprenorphine and Fentanyl in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2006; 319(2): 682 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. De Maeyer, N. H. Prins, J. A. J. Schuurkes, and R. A. Lefebvre Differential Effects of 5-Hydroxytryptamine4 Receptor Agonists at Gastric versus Cardiac Receptors: An Operational Framework to Explain and Quantify Organ-Specific Behavior J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2006; 317(3): 955 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. G. Visser, B. Sallstrom, T. Forsberg, L. A. Peletier, and J. Gabrielsson Modeling Drug- and System-Related Changes in Body Temperature: Application to Clomethiazole-Induced Hypothermia, Long-Lasting Tolerance Development, and Circadian Rhythm in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2006; 317(1): 209 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yassen, E. Olofsen, A. Dahan, and M. Danhof Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of the Antinociceptive Effect of Buprenorphine and Fentanyl in Rats: Role of Receptor Equilibration Kinetics J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2005; 313(3): 1136 - 1149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||