QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Correction An erratum has been published All Versions of this Article: jpet.103.053710v1 307/1/42    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Borghese, C. M. Articles by Harris, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Borghese, C. M. Articles by Harris, R. A.

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY

Sites of Excitatory and Inhibitory Actions of Alcohols on Neuronal 24 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors

Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas (C.M.B., L.A.H., V.B., R.A.H.); and Department of Anesthesia and Beckman Program for Molecular and Genetic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California (J.R.T.)

To define potential alcohol binding sites in the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) we used cysteine mutagenesis and sulfhydryl-specific labeling. The basis of this strategy is that covalent addition of an alkylthiol group to a cysteine in an alcohol binding site will mimic the action of an irreversibly bound alcohol. Each amino acid in the extracellular region of the second transmembrane segment of the nAChR subunit 2 was mutated to cysteine. The resulting 2 subunits were coexpressed with wild-type 4in Xenopus laevis oocytes, and the responses were studied using two-electrode voltage clamp. Of the 11 mutants tested, 2 fulfilled criteria for participation in an alcohol binding site: 2(L262C)4 and 2(L263C)4. Covalent binding of propanethiol to these cysteines did not change acetylcholine (ACh) affinity, but modified ACh maximal response in both cases: it increased for 2(L263C)4 and decreased for 2(L262C)4. The same modifications on ACh responses were obtained with ethanol on 2(L263C)4 and octanol on 2(L262C)4. This suggested that alcohol binding at L263 enhances receptor function, whereas binding at L262 inhibits function. We studied different n-alcohols (ethanol, butanol, pentanol, and octanol), as well as isoflurane and urethane, on these two mutants. Covalent binding of propanethiol to the cysteines revealed changes in the alcohol modulation consistent with an excitatory site (L263) or an inhibitory site (L262) being no longer accessible to alcohol. Thus, n-alcohols appear to act on both sites and their ability to enhance (short-chain), inhibit (long-chain), or produce no effect (intermediate-chain) depends upon their relative action at these two sites.

Address correspondence to: R. Adron Harris, University of Texas at Austin, Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research, 1 University Station A4800, Austin, TX 78712-0159. E-mail: harris{at}mail.utexas.edu

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. Dopico and D. M. Lovinger Acute Alcohol Action and Desensitization of Ligand-Gated Ion Channels Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2009; 61(1): 98 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Harris, J. R. Trudell, and S. J. Mihic Ethanol's Molecular Targets Sci. Signal., July 15, 2008; 1(28): re7 - re7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Yang, P. S. Milutinovic, R. J. Brosnan, E. I. Eger II, and J. M. Sonner The Plasticizer Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate Modulates {gamma}-Aminobutyric Acid Type A and Glycine Receptor Function Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 393 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Crowley, S. N. Treistman, and A. M. Dopico Distinct Structural Features of Phospholipids Differentially Determine Ethanol Sensitivity and Basal Function of BK Channels Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2005; 68(1): 4 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]