JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on March 6, 2003; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.103.049619


0022-3565/03/3053-1104-1115$20.00
JPET 305:1104-1115, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.103.049619v1
305/3/1104    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seifert, R.
Right arrow Articles by Elz, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seifert, R.
Right arrow Articles by Elz, S.

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR

Multiple Differences in Agonist and Antagonist Pharmacology between Human and Guinea Pig Histamine H1-Receptor

Roland Seifert, Katharina Wenzel-Seifert, Tilmann Bürckstümmer, Heinz H. Pertz, Walter Schunack, Stefan Dove, Armin Buschauer, and Sigurd Elz

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, the University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas (R.S., K.W.-S.); Department of Molecular Biosciences, the University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas (T.B.); Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany (T.B.); Institute of Pharmacy, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany (H.H.P., W.S.); Institute of Pharmacy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany (S.D., A.B., S.E.)

Species isoforms of histamine H2-, H3-, and H4-receptors differ in their pharmacological properties. The study aim was to dissect differences between the human H1R (hH1R) and guinea pig H1R (ghH1R). We coexpressed hH1R and gpH1R with regulators of G-protein signaling in Sf9 insect cells and analyzed the GTPase activity of Gq-proteins. Small H1R agonists showed similar effects at hH1R and gpH1R, whereas bulkier 2-phenylhistamines and histaprodifens were up to ~10-fold more potent at gpH1R than at hH1R. Most 2-phenylhistamines and histaprodifens were more efficacious at gpH1R than at hH1R. Several first-generation H1R antagonists were ~2-fold, and arpromidine-type H1R antagonists up to ~10-fold more potent at gpH1R than at hH1R. [3H]Mepyramine competition binding studies confirmed the potency differences of the GTPase studies. Phe-153->Leu-153 or Ile-433->Val-433 exchange in hH1R (hH1R->gpH1R) resulted in poor receptor expression, low [3H]mepyramine affinity, and functional inactivity. The Phe-153->Leu-153/Ile-433->Val-433 double mutant expressed excellently but only partially changed the pharmacological properties of hH1R. Small H1R agonists and 2-phenylhistamines interacted differentially with human and guinea pig H2R in terms of potency and efficacy, respectively. Our data show the following: 1) there are differences in agonist- and antagonist-pharmacology of hH1R and gpH1R encompassing diverse classes of bulky ligands. These differences may be explained by higher conformational flexibility of gpH1R relative to hH1R; 2) Phe-153 and Ile-433 are critical for proper folding and expression of hH1R; and 3) H2R species isoforms distinguish between H1R agonists.


Received for publication January 28, 2003
Accepted February 21, 2003.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Roland Seifert, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, The University of Kansas, Malott Hall, Room 5064, 1251 Wescoe Hall Drive, Lawrence, KS 66045-7582. E-mail: rseifert{at}ku.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
K.-F. Deml, S. Beermann, D. Neumann, A. Strasser, and R. Seifert
Interactions of Histamine H1-Receptor Agonists and Antagonists with the Human Histamine H4-Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2009; 76(5): 1019 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
H.-J. Wittmann, R. Seifert, and A. Strasser
Contribution of Binding Enthalpy and Entropy to Affinity of Antagonist and Agonist Binding at Human and Guinea Pig Histamine H1-Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2009; 76(1): 25 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. Strasser, H.-J. Wittmann, M. Kunze, S. Elz, and R. Seifert
Molecular Basis for the Selective Interaction of Synthetic Agonists with the Human Histamine H1-Receptor Compared with the Guinea Pig H1-Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2009; 75(3): 454 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
A. Strasser, H.-J. Wittmann, and R. Seifert
Ligand-Specific Contribution of the N Terminus and E2-Loop to Pharmacological Properties of the Histamine H1-Receptor
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2008; 326(3): 783 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
A. Strasser, B. Striegl, H.-J. Wittmann, and R. Seifert
Pharmacological Profile of Histaprodifens at Four Recombinant Histamine H1 Receptor Species Isoforms
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2008; 324(1): 60 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
H. Preuss, P. Ghorai, A. Kraus, S. Dove, A. Buschauer, and R. Seifert
Constitutive Activity and Ligand Selectivity of Human, Guinea Pig, Rat, and Canine Histamine H2 Receptors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2007; 321(3): 983 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
H. Preuss, P. Ghorai, A. Kraus, S. Dove, A. Buschauer, and R. Seifert
Mutations of Cys-17 and Ala-271 in the Human Histamine H2 Receptor Determine the Species Selectivity of Guanidine-Type Agonists and Increase Constitutive Activity
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2007; 321(3): 975 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S.-X. Xie, A. Kraus, P. Ghorai, Q.-Z. Ye, S. Elz, A. Buschauer, and R. Seifert
N1-(3-Cyclohexylbutanoyl)-N2-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl]guanidine (UR-AK57), a Potent Partial Agonist for the Human Histamine H1- and H2-Receptors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2006; 317(3): 1262 - 1268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S.-X. Xie, P. Ghorai, Q.-Z. Ye, A. Buschauer, and R. Seifert
Probing Ligand-Specific Histamine H1- and H2-Receptor Conformations with NG-Acylated Imidazolylpropylguanidines
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2006; 317(1): 139 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Bruysters, A. Jongejan, A. Akdemir, R. A. Bakker, and R. Leurs
A Gq/11-coupled Mutant Histamine H1 Receptor F435A Activated Solely by Synthetic Ligands (RASSL)
J. Biol. Chem., October 14, 2005; 280(41): 34741 - 34746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. Bruysters, A. Jongejan, M. Gillard, F. van de Manakker, R. A. Bakker, P. Chatelain, and R. Leurs
Pharmacological Differences between Human and Guinea Pig Histamine H1 Receptors: Asn84 (2.61) as Key Residue within an Additional Binding Pocket in the H1 Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2005; 67(4): 1045 - 1052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
N. H. Moniri, D. Covington-Strachan, and R. G. Booth
Ligand-Directed Functional Heterogeneity of Histamine H1 Receptors: Novel Dual-Function Ligands Selectively Activate and Block H1-Mediated Phospholipase C and Adenylyl Cyclase Signaling
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2004; 311(1): 274 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. P. Fitzsimons, F. Monczor, N. Fernandez, C. Shayo, and C. Davio
Mepyramine, a Histamine H1 Receptor Inverse Agonist, Binds Preferentially to a G Protein-coupled Form of the Receptor and Sequesters G Protein
J. Biol. Chem., August 13, 2004; 279(33): 34431 - 34439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
R. A. Bakker, D. M. Weiner, T. ter Laak, T. Beuming, O. P. Zuiderveld, M. Edelbroek, U. Hacksell, H. Timmerman, M. R. Brann, and R. Leurs
8R-Lisuride Is a Potent Stereospecific Histamine H1-Receptor Partial Agonist
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2004; 65(3): 538 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.