![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vol. 305, Issue 2, 710-718, May 2003
Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, School of
Pharmacy, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
In this study the role of cytochrome P450 2D (CYP2D) in the
pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship of (+)-tramadol [(+)-T] has been explored in rats. Male Wistar rats were infused with (+)-T in
the absence of and during pretreatment with a reversible CYP2D
inhibitor quinine (Q), determining plasma concentrations of Q, (+)-T,
and (+)-O-demethyltramadol [(+)-M1], and
measuring antinociception. Pharmacokinetics of (+)-M1, but not (+)-T,
was affected by Q pretreatment: early after the start of (+)-T
infusion, levels of (+)-M1 were significantly lower
(P < 0.05). However, at later times during Q
infusion those levels increased continuously, exceeding the values
found in animals that did not receive the inhibitor. These results
suggest that CYP2D is involved in the formation and elimination of
(+)-M1. In fact, results from another experiment where (+)-M1 was given
in the presence and in absence of Q showed that (+)-M1 elimination
clearance (CLME0) was significantly lower
(P < 0.05) in animals receiving Q. Inhibition of
both (+)-M1 formation clearance (CLM10) and
CLME0 were modeled by an inhibitory EMAX model, and the estimates (relative
standard error) of the maximum degree of inhibition
(EMAX) and IC50, plasma
concentration of Q eliciting half of EMAX
for CLM10 and CLME0, were 0.94 (0.04), 97 (0.51) ng/ml, and 48 (0.42) ng/ml, respectively. The modeling of the
time course of antinociception showed that the contribution of (+)-T
was negligible and (+)-M1 was responsible for the observed effects,
which depend linearly on (+)-M1 effect site concentrations. Therefore,
the CYP2D activity is a major determinant of the antinociception elicited after (+)-T administration.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. V. HERSH and P. A. MOORE Drug interactions in dentistry: The importance of knowing your CYPs J Am Dent Assoc, March 1, 2004; 135(3): 298 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||