QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gründemann, D. Articles by Schömig, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gründemann, D. Articles by Schömig, E.

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR

Agmatine Is Efficiently Transported by Non-Neuronal Monoamine Transporters Extraneuronal Monoamine Transporter (EMT) and Organic Cation Transporter 2 (OCT2)

Department of Pharmacology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Agmatine has received considerable attention recently. Available evidence suggests that agmatine functions as a neurotransmitter and inhibits, via induction of antizyme, cellular proliferation. Because of its positive charge, agmatine will not appreciably cross cellular membranes by simple diffusion. Indeed, all physiological models require a channel or transporter protein in the plasma membrane to effect inactivation or nonexocytotic release of agmatine. However, a transport mechanism for agmatine has not been identified on a molecular level so far. In the present study, the non-neuronal monoamine transporters, organic cation transporter (OCT) 1, OCT2, and extraneuronal monoamine transporter (EMT) (gene symbols SLC22A1–A3), both from human and rat, were examined, stably expressed in 293 cells, for [³H]agmatine transport. Our results indicate that OCT2 and EMT, but not OCT1, efficiently translocate agmatine. The structural homolog putrescine was not accepted as substrate. Uptake of agmatine via EMT and OCT2 was saturable, with K_m values of 1 to 2 mM. The affinity of OCT1 was 10-fold lower. Carrier-mediated efflux of agmatine was documented in a trans-stimulation experiment. Finally, uptake of agmatine increased dramatically with increasing pH. Thus, only the singly charged species of agmatine is accepted as substrate. In conclusion, both EMT and OCT2 must be considered for the control of agmatine levels in rat and human.

Address correspondence to: D. Gründemann, Department of Pharmacology, University of Cologne, Gleueler Strasse 24, 50931 Cologne, Germany. E-mail: dirk.gruendemann{at}uni-koeln.de

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K.-i. Umehara, M. Iwai, Y. Adachi, T. Iwatsubo, T. Usui, and H. Kamimura Hepatic Uptake and Excretion of (-)-N-{2-[(R)-3-(6,7-Dimethoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline-2-carbonyl)piperidino]ethyl}-4-fluorobenzamide (YM758), a Novel If Channel Inhibitor, in Rats and Humans Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2008; 36(6): 1030 - 1038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Jonker and A. H. Schinkel Pharmacological and Physiological Functions of the Polyspecific Organic Cation Transporters: OCT1, 2, and 3 (SLC22A1-3) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2004; 308(1): 2 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. MOLDERINGS, M. BRUSS, H. BONISCH, and M. GOTHERT Identification and Pharmacological Characterization of a Specific Agmatine Transport System in Human Tumor Cell Lines Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2003; 1009(1): 75 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]