![]() |
|
|
Vol. 303, Issue 3, 1075-1085, December 2002
Department of Pharmacology, Southern Illinois University,
Springfield, Illinois (A.C.A., Y.-F.X., M.K.); Cortex Pharmaceuticals
Inc., Irvine, California (G.R.); and Department of Psychiatry,
University of California, Irvine, California (G.L.)
CX516 (BDP-12) and CX546, two first-generation benzamide-type AMPA
receptor modulators, were compared with regard to their influence on
AMPA receptor-mediated currents, autaptic responses in cultured
hippocampal neurons, hippocampal excitatory postsynaptic currents,
synaptic field potentials, and agonist binding. The two drugs exhibited
comparable potencies in most tests but differed in their efficacy and
in their relative impact on various response parameters. CX546 greatly
prolonged the duration of synaptic responses, and it slowed 10-fold the
deactivation of excised-patch currents following 1-ms pulses of
glutamate. The effects of CX516 on those measures were, by comparison,
small; however, the drug was equally or more efficacious than CX546 in
increasing the amplitude of synaptic responses. This double
dissociation suggests that amplitude and duration of synaptic responses
are governed by different aspects of receptor kinetics, which are
differentially modified by the two drugs. These effects can be
reproduced in receptor simulations if one assumes that CX516
preferentially accelerates channel opening while CX546 slows channel
closing. In binding tests, CX546 caused an approximately 2-fold
increase in the affinity for radiolabeled agonists, whereas CX516 was
ineffective. More importantly, even millimolar concentrations of CX516
did not influence the dose-response relation for CX546, suggesting the
possibility that they bind to different sites. Taken together, the
evidence suggests that benzamide modulators from the Ampakine family
form two subgroups with different modes and sites of action. Of these,
CX516-type drugs may have the greater therapeutic utility because of
their limited efficacy in prolonging synaptic responses and in
attenuating receptor desensitization.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. A. Mitchell and M. W. Fleck Targeting AMPA Receptor Gating Processes with Allosteric Modulators and Mutations Biophys. J., April 1, 2007; 92(7): 2392 - 2402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Ryder, J. F. Falcone, J. R. Manro, K. A. Svensson, and K. M. Merchant Pharmacological Characterization of cGMP Regulation by the Biarylpropylsulfonamide Class of Positive, Allosteric Modulators of {alpha}-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic Acid Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2006; 319(1): 293 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Jourdi, X. Lu, T. Yanagihara, J. C. Lauterborn, X. Bi, C. M. Gall, and M. Baudry Prolonged Positive Modulation of {alpha}-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic Acid (AMPA) Receptors Induces Calpain-Mediated PSD-95/Dlg/ZO-1 Protein Degradation and AMPA Receptor Down-Regulation in Cultured Hippocampal Slices J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2005; 314(1): 16 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Suzuki, M. Kessler, K. Montgomery, and A. C. Arai Divergent Effects of the Purinoceptor Antagonists Suramin and Pyridoxal-5'-phosphate-6-(2'-naphthylazo-6'-nitro-4',8'-disulfonate) (PPNDS) on {alpha}-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic Acid (AMPA) Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2004; 66(6): 1738 - 1747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Quirk and E. S. Nisenbaum Multiple Molecular Determinants for Allosteric Modulation of Alternatively Spliced AMPA Receptors J. Neurosci., November 26, 2003; 23(34): 10953 - 10962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Leever, S. Clark, A. M. Weeks, and K. M. Partin Identification of a Site in GluR1 and GluR2 That Is Important for Modulation of Deactivation and Desensitization Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2003; 64(1): 5 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||