JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hung, K.-c.
Right arrow Articles by Tseng, L. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hung, K.-c.
Right arrow Articles by Tseng, L. F.

Vol. 303, Issue 2, 874-879, November 2002

D-Pro2-Endomorphin-1 and D-Pro2-Endomorphin-2, Respectively, Attenuate the Antinociception Induced by Endomorphin-1 and Endomorphin-2 Given Intrathecally in the Mouse

Kuei-chun Hung, Hsiang-en Wu, Hirokazu Mizoguchi, Shinobu Sakurada, Toru Okayama, Tsutomu Fujimura, Kimie Murayama, Tsukasa Sakurada, James M. Fujimoto and Leon F. Tseng

Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (K.-C.H., H.-E.W., H.M., J.M.F., L.F.T.); Department of Physiology and Anatomy, Tohoku Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan (S.S.); Research Institute, Fuji Chemical Industries Ltd., Takaoka, Japan (T.O.); Central Laboratory of Medical Sciences, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan (T.F., K.M.); and Department of Biochemistry, Daiichi College of Pharmaceutical Science, Fukuoka, Japan (T.S.)

First, the antinociception with the tail-flick test of D-Pro2-endomorphin-1 and D-Pro2-endomorphin-2 given i.t. was compared with that produced by endomorphin-1 and -2 in male CD-1 mice. High doses of D-Pro2-endomorphin-1 (0.2-0.4 pmol) and D-Pro2-endomorphin-2 (300-800 pmol) given i.t. produced antinociception with low intrinsic activity [about 25% maximum possible effect (MPE)] compared with that of endomorphin-1 (16.4 nmol) and endomorphin-2 (35 nmol) (>90% MPE). Second, coadministration of a low dose of D-Pro2-endomorphin-1 (0.1 pmol), which given alone did not affect the tail-flick latencies, markedly attenuated the antinociception induced by endomorphin-1 (16.4 nmol) but not by endomorphin-2 (35 nmol). Similarly, coadministration of a low dose of D-Pro2-endomorphin-2 (200 pmol), which given alone did not affect the tail-flick latencies, significantly attenuated the antinociception induced by endomorphin-2 (35 nmol) and, to a much lesser extent, endomorphin-1 (16.4 nmol). It is concluded that D-Pro2-endomorphin-1 and D-Pro2-endomorphin-2 at high doses were partial opioid receptor agonists to produce antinociception, and at low doses were opioid receptor antagonists to block selectively the antinociception induced by endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2, respectively. Furthermore, our results are consistent with the view that the antinociception induced by endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 is mediated by the stimulation of different subtypes of µ-opioid receptors.


0022-3565/02/3032-0874$07.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
H. Watanabe, D. Nakayama, K. Ito, C. Watanabe, H. Mizoguchi, T. Fujimura, K. Murayama, S. Kawamura, T. Sato, C. Sakurada, et al.
A Tyr-W-MIF-1 Analog Containing D-Pro2 Acts as a Selective {micro}2-Opioid Receptor Antagonist in the Mouse
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2005; 312(3): 1075 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.