|
|
|
|
Vol. 303, Issue 2, 664-672, November 2002
Department of Psychology (A.S.R., S.N.M., M.T.B.) and College of
Pharmacy (L.P.D.), University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
The ability of reboxetine, a selective inhibitor of the norepinephrine
transporter and noncompetitive antagonist at neuronal nicotinic
receptors, to alter nicotine self-administration in rats was compared
with that of mecamylamine, a classical noncompetitive antagonist at
nicotinic receptors. The ability of reboxetine to alter
sucrose-maintained responding was also examined to assess the
specificity of the effect on nicotine self-administration. Rats were
trained on a fixed ratio 5 schedule to self-administer nicotine (0.02 mg/kg/infusion i.v.) or to respond for sucrose pellets. Upon reaching a
stable baseline, rats were pretreated 15 min before the session with
vehicle, reboxetine (racemic), (+)-(S,S)-reboxetine (0.3-30 mg/kg s.c.)
or mecamylamine (0.5-4 mg/kg s.c). To assess the effect of repeated
administration, reboxetine (5.6 mg/kg) was injected once daily for 14 consecutive sessions before either nicotine self-administration or
sucrose-maintained responding. Specificity was further assessed by
examining the ability of repeated administration of reboxetine (5.6 mg/kg) to alter nicotine-induced hyperactivity (0.8 mg/kg). Reboxetine, (+)-(S,S)-reboxetine, and mecamylamine
dose dependently decreased nicotine self-administration by ~60%,
whereas reboxetine and
(+)-(S,S)-reboxetine decreased
sucrose-maintained responding to a lesser extent (~20%). Repeated
administration of reboxetine (5.6 mg/kg) decreased nicotine self-administration and sucrose-maintained responding across the 14 sessions, suggesting that tolerance did not develop to these effects of
reboxetine. Additionally, reboxetine did not alter baseline locomotor
activity, indicating that the decrease in operant responding for
nicotine and sucrose was not the result of a nonspecific decrease in
activity. The reboxetine-induced decrease in nicotine self-administration and sucrose-maintained responding may be the result
of inhibition of norepinephrine transporters and/or neuronal nicotinic
receptor function.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. H. Frishman Smoking cessation pharmacotherapy Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, August 1, 2009; 3(4): 287 - 308. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Ray, M Rukstalis, C Jepson, A. Strasser, F Patterson, K Lynch, and C Lerman Effects of atomoxetine on subjective and neurocognitive symptoms of nicotine abstinence J Psychopharmacol, March 1, 2009; 23(2): 168 - 176. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. De Biasi and R. Salas Influence of Neuronal Nicotinic Receptors over Nicotine Addiction and Withdrawal Experimental Biology and Medicine, August 1, 2008; 233(8): 917 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. Berrettini and C. E. Lerman Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacogenetics of Nicotine Dependence Am J Psychiatry, August 1, 2005; 162(8): 1441 - 1451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lerman, F. Patterson, and W. Berrettini Treating Tobacco Dependence: State of the Science and New Directions J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2005; 23(2): 311 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Middleton, W. A. Cass, and L. P. Dwoskin Nicotinic Receptor Modulation of Dopamine Transporter Function in Rat Striatum and Medial Prefrontal Cortex J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2004; 308(1): 367 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||