![]() |
|
|
Vol. 303, Issue 1, 412-423, October 2002
Puracyp, Inc., San Diego, California
Assessing the inducibility of CYP3A4 by various xenobiotics can predict
potential drug interactions. In the present investigation, human
hepatoma cells were stably integrated with either the CYP3A4 enhancer
region and a luciferase reporter gene or the CYP3A4-luciferase construct and the human pregnane X receptor (PXR). Several colonies containing one to three copies of luciferase per cell were identified by Southern blot analysis. Those transformants producing high luciferase activity in response to rifampicin were used to standardize a 96-well plate screening system with minimal inter- and intraplate variability. Standardization also consisted of assessing viability of
cells cultured in medium containing various serum concentrations. In
cells maintained for 48 h in medium with less than 5% serum, a
significant (p < 0.01) decline was observed in
viability accompanied by altered induction. A defined serum-free medium
also produced less viable cells but did not alter the inductive
response. Treatment of transformants with various concentrations of
rifampicin produced a dose-response curve with maximal induction at 10 µM (5.6 ± 0.18- and 2.1 ± 0.3-fold above dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO)-treated cells in transformants with and without PXR,
respectively). Of additional agents examined for their ability to
induce CYP3A4, omeprazole (200 µM) was the most potent inducer
(12.8 ± 1.9- and 2.4 ± 0.2-fold above DMSO-treated cells in
transformants with and without PXR, respectively). Mifepristone and
mevastatin produced modest induction (~3-fold) in the cell line
containing exogenous PXR, but produced less than 1.2-fold increases in
cells lacking PXR. Thus, only potent inducers can be identified in the
cell line without PXR. In contrast, cells containing the receptor can
be used to rank CYP3A4 induction. Because a high volume of chemicals
can be readily and accurately screened for their ability to induce
CYP3A4 with this format, such a system could be valuable in the initial
stages of preclinical drug development.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Cheung and F. J. Gonzalez Humanized Mouse Lines and Their Application for Prediction of Human Drug Metabolism and Toxicological Risk Assessment J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2008; 327(2): 288 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Surapureddi, R. Rana, J. K. Reddy, and J. A. Goldstein Nuclear Receptor Coactivator 6 Mediates the Synergistic Activation of Human Cytochrome P-450 2C9 by the Constitutive Androstane Receptor and Hepatic Nuclear Factor-4{alpha} Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2008; 74(3): 913 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Wang, W. W. Prosise, J. Chen, S. S. Taremi, H. V. Le, V. Madison, X. Cui, A. Thomas, K.-C. Cheng, and C. A. Lesburg Construction and characterization of a fully active PXR/SRC-1 tethered protein with increased stability Protein Eng. Des. Sel., July 1, 2008; 21(7): 425 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Bordet, B. Buisson, M. Michaud, C. Drouot, P. Galea, P. Delaage, N. P. Akentieva, A. S. Evers, D. F. Covey, M. A. Ostuni, et al. Identification and Characterization of Cholest-4-en-3-one, Oxime (TRO19622), a Novel Drug Candidate for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2007; 322(2): 709 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Urquhart, R. G. Tirona, and R. B. Kim Nuclear Receptors and the Regulation of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Drug Transporters: Implications for Interindividual Variability in Response to Drugs J. Clin. Pharmacol., May 1, 2007; 47(5): 566 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Ma, Y. Shah, C. Cheung, G. L. Guo, L. Feigenbaum, K. W. Krausz, J. R. Idle, and F. J. Gonzalez The Pregnane X Receptor Gene-Humanized Mouse: A Model for Investigating Drug-Drug Interactions Mediated by Cytochromes P450 3A Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2007; 35(2): 194 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Faucette, T.-C. Zhang, R. Moore, T. Sueyoshi, C. J. Omiecinski, E. L. LeCluyse, M. Negishi, and H. Wang Relative Activation of Human Pregnane X Receptor versus Constitutive Androstane Receptor Defines Distinct Classes of CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 Inducers J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 72 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Katso, J. H. Parham, M. Caivano, W. C. Clay, J. P. Condreay, D. W. Gray, K. M. Lindley, S. J. Mason, J. Rieger, N. C. Wakes, et al. Evaluation of Cell-Based Assays for Steroid Nuclear Receptors Delivered by Recombinant Baculoviruses J Biomol Screen, October 1, 2005; 10(7): 715 - 724. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-F. Yueh, M. Kawahara, and J. Raucy HIGH VOLUME BIOASSAYS TO ASSESS CYP3A4-MEDIATED DRUG INTERACTIONS: INDUCTION AND INHIBITION IN A SINGLE CELL LINE Drug Metab. Dispos., January 1, 2005; 33(1): 38 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Rosenfeld, R. Vargas Jr., W. Xie, and R. M. Evans Genetic Profiling Defines the Xenobiotic Gene Network Controlled by the Nuclear Receptor Pregnane X Receptor Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2003; 17(7): 1268 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Raucy Regulation of CYP3A4 Expression in Human Hepatocytes by Pharmaceuticals and Natural Products Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2003; 31(5): 533 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Madan, R. A. Graham, K. M. Carroll, D. R. Mudra, L. A. Burton, L. A. Krueger, A. D. Downey, M. Czerwinski, J. Forster, M. D. Ribadeneira, et al. Effects of Prototypical Microsomal Enzyme Inducers on Cytochrome P450 Expression in Cultured Human Hepatocytes Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2003; 31(4): 421 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||