|
|
|
|
Vol. 302, Issue 3, 1158-1167, September 2002
Division of Pharmacology, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug
Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands (S.A.G.V.,
C.J.G.M.S., B.P.R.R., M.D.); Pfizer Global Research & Development,
Discovery Biology, Sandwich, Kent, United Kingdom (P.H.v.d.G.);
Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
(L.A.P.)
The neuroactive steroid alphaxalone reveals a complex biphasic
concentration-effect relationship using the 11.5 to 30 Hz frequency band of the electroencephalogram (EEG) as biomarker. The purpose of the
present investigation was to develop a mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model to describe this observation. The
proposed model is based on receptor theory and aims to separate the
drug-receptor interaction from the transduction of the initial stimulus
into the observed biphasic response. Individual concentration-time courses of alphaxalone were obtained in combination with continuous recording of the EEG parameter. Alphaxalone was administered
intravenously in various dosages. The pharmacokinetics were described
by a two-compartment model, and parameter estimates for clearance,
intercompartmental clearance, volume of distribution 1 and 2 were
158 ± 29 ml · min
1 · kg
1, 143 ± 31 ml · min
1
· kg
1, 122 ± 20 ml · kg
1 and
606 ± 48 ml · kg
1, respectively.
Concentration-effect relationships exhibited a biphasic pattern and
delay in onset of effect. The hysteresis was described on the basis of
an effect-compartment model with Cmax as
covariate. The pharmacodynamic model consisted of a receptor model,
featuring a monophasic saturable receptor activation model in
combination with a biphasic stimulus-response model. The in vivo
affinity (KPD) was estimated at 432 ± 26 ng · ml
1. Unique parameter estimates were
obtained that were independent of the dose and the duration of the
infusion. In conclusion, we have shown that this mechanism-based
approach, which separates drug- and system-related properties in vivo,
was successfully applied for the characterization of the biphasic
effect versus time patterns of alphaxalone. The model should be of use
in the characterization of other biphasic responses.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. K. Ellerkmann, J. Bruhn, M. Soehle, M. Kehrer, A. Hoeft, and S. Kreuer Maximizing Prediction Probability PK as an Alternative Semiparametric Approach to Estimate the Plasma Effect-Site Equilibration Rate Constant ke0 Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2009; 109(5): 1470 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Sear What makes a molecule an anaesthetic? Studies on the mechanisms of anaesthesia using a physicochemical approach Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2009; 103(1): 50 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yassen, J. Kan, E. Olofsen, E. Suidgeest, A. Dahan, and M. Danhof Mechanism-Based Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of the Respiratory-Depressant Effect of Buprenorphine and Fentanyl in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2006; 319(2): 682 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yassen, E. Olofsen, A. Dahan, and M. Danhof Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of the Antinociceptive Effect of Buprenorphine and Fentanyl in Rats: Role of Receptor Equilibration Kinetics J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2005; 313(3): 1136 - 1149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Sewell and J. W. Sear Derivation of preliminary three-dimensional pharmacophoric maps for chemically diverse intravenous general anaesthetics{dagger} Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2004; 92(1): 45 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. G. Visser, D. R. H. Huntjens, P. H. van der Graaf, L. A. Peletier, and M. Danhof Mechanism-Based Modeling of the Pharmacodynamic Interaction of Alphaxalone and Midazolam in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2003; 307(2): 765 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. G. Visser, F. L. C. Wolters, P. H. van der Graaf, L. A. Peletier, and M. Danhof Dose-Dependent EEG Effects of Zolpidem Provide Evidence for GABAA Receptor Subtype Selectivity in Vivo J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2003; 304(3): 1251 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.A.G. Visser, F.L.C. Wolters, J. M. Gubbens-Stibbe, E. Tukker, P. H. van der Graaf, L. A. Peletier, and M. Danhof Mechanism-Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of the Electroencephalogram Effects of GABAA Receptor Modulators: In Vitro-in Vivo Correlations J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2003; 304(1): 88 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. G. Visser, W. W. F. T. Gladdines, P. H. van der Graaf, L. A. Peletier, and M. Danhof Neuroactive Steroids Differ in Potency but Not in Intrinsic Efficacy at the GABAA Receptor in Vivo J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2002; 303(2): 616 - 626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||