JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cemazar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sersa, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cemazar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sersa, G.

Vol. 302, Issue 1, 337-343, July 2002

Schedule-Dependent Interaction between Vinblastine and Cisplatin in Ehrlich Ascites Tumors in Mice

Maja Cemazar, Marija Auersperg, Janez Scancar, Irena Srebotnik Kirbis, Ana Pogacnik and Gregor Sersa

Institute of Oncology (M.C., M.A., I.S.K., A.P., G.S.) and Jozef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia (J.S.)

Information on the in vivo antitumor efficiency of the combination of Vinca alkaloids in animal tumor models, especially vinblastine (VLB) with cisplatin [cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II); CDDP] is very limited. Therefore, the aim of our study was to explore whether antitumor schedule dependence exists for the combination of CDDP and VLB on i.p. Ehrlich ascites tumors in mice. Animals were treated 3 days after tumor transplantation with VLB (0.006 mg/kg) or CDDP (0.05 mg/kg) alone, VLB followed by CDDP, and CDDP followed by VLB. The time interval between i.p. injections of the drugs was 24 h. Cell number was measured by counting viable cells using the trypan blue exclusion assay, cell platinum content by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry, DNA distribution pattern using flow cytometry, apoptosis by flow-cytometric terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling assay, and cell morphology. Combination of CDDP and VLB resulted in additive interaction when VLB preceded CDDP as determined from cell survival data 24 h after completion of the therapy and in increased platinum content (two times) compared with the same combination in a reverse schedule (CDDP given before VLB), which resulted in antagonism. None of the treatment combinations induced apoptosis. We propose that the observed increase in antitumor effectiveness is mainly due to higher platinum accumulation in tumor cells, which we unambiguously demonstrated by measurement of platinum content in the tumor cells, leading to increased cytotoxicity as well as to cell cycle-dependent effects of VLB and CDDP.


0022-3565/02/3021-0337$03.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.