![]() |
|
|
Vol. 302, Issue 1, 257-263, July 2002
Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science
University, Portland Alcohol Research Center and Veterans
Administration Medical Center, Portland, Oregon
Loss of righting reflex (LRR) has traditionally been used to estimate
hypnotic sensitivity to ethanol in rodents. Traditional methods of
monitoring ethanol-induced sedation seems to lack accuracy in
estimating blood ethanol concentration (BEC) at initial LRR, a measure
of initial sensitivity. Herein, we present a novel method that improves
detection of the onset of LRR by using a new apparatus and a
loss-of-function criterion of 5 s. DBA/2J and C57BL/6J mice were
placed in cylindrical restrainers after injection of 3 g/kg (20% v/v)
ethanol. Restrainers were then turned until mice were no longer able to
right themselves within 5 s from a position on their back, which
represented the endpoint of the initial loss of righting reflex.
Initial sensitivity and acute functional tolerance (AFT) to ethanol
were assessed in the same group of mice by quantifying BEC at the
initial loss and subsequent recoveries of righting reflex over four
sequential injections [3 g/kg + (3 × 0.5 g/kg)]. Initial brain
sensitivity was calculated from BEC at the first LRR, using the
parameters of ethanol uptake kinetics. These values of initial
sensitivity were similar for the two strains. On the other hand, DBA/2J
mice recovered at higher BEC than C57BL/6J animals. AFT calculated as a
difference between the maximum BEC at any recovery and the value of
initial sensitivity was greater in DBA/2J mice. These results show that
the novel method is a sensitive tool for the measurement of initial
sensitivity and detection of AFT to the hypnotic effects of ethanol.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E. Kralic, M. Wheeler, K. Renzi, C. Ferguson, T. K. O'Buckley, A. C. Grobin, A. L. Morrow, and G. E. Homanics Deletion of GABAA Receptor alpha 1 Subunit-containing Receptors Alters Responses to Ethanol and Other Anesthetics J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2003; 305(2): 600 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||