|
|
|
|
Vol. 300, Issue 1, 330-338, January 2002
Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of
Pharmacology, Sylvius Laboratory, Leiden, The Netherlands (K.P.Z.,
N.T., H.J.M., J.M.G.-S., P.H.v.d.G., M.D.); and Mathematical Institute,
Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands (L.A.P.)
ABSTRACT
The objective of this investigation was to characterize quantitatively
the pharmacodynamic interaction between
N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-2-pyridinyl-cyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY-100,635) and
R-(+)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (R-8-OH-DPAT) in vivo. The 8-OH-DPAT-induced change in body
temperature was used as a pharmacodynamic endpoint. Four groups of rats
each received 1 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT in 5 min during computer-controlled infusions of physiological saline or WAY-100,635, targeted at steady-state concentrations of 20, 85, and 170 ng/ml. Body temperature was monitored continuously with a telemetric system, and frequent blood
samples were obtained to determine the pharmacokinetics of both drugs.
Large differences in pharmacokinetics were observed between WAY-100,635
and R-8-OH-DPAT, reflected in values of the terminal
elimination half-life of 33 and 143 min, respectively. Infusion of
WAY-100,635 had no influence on the pharmacokinetics of
R-8-OH-DPAT. With regard to the pharmacodynamics, clear
antagonism of the R-8-OH-DPAT-induced hypothermia was
observed. The complex pharmacological effect versus time profiles of
R-8-OH-DPAT were analyzed on the basis of an indirect
physiological response model with set point control coupled to a
competitive interaction model for an agonist and antagonist acting at a
common receptor. This model converged, yielding precise estimates of
the pharmacodynamic parameters of both WAY-100,635 and
R-8-OH-DPAT, which were independent of the infusion rate of
WAY-100,635. The estimated in vivo binding constant of WAY-100,635 was
0.98 ng/ml (2.3 nM), which is very similar to the reported value from
in vitro receptor binding assays. The findings of this investigation
show that, in contrast to earlier reports in the literature, WAY
100,635 behaves as a pure competitive antagonist at the
5-hydroxytryptamine1A receptor in vivo.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. J. van Steeg, J. Freijer, M. Danhof, and E. C. M. de Lange Mechanism-Based Pharmacodynamic Modeling of S(-)-Atenolol: Estimation of in Vivo Affinity for the {beta}1-Adrenoceptor with an Agonist-Antagonist Interaction Model J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2008; 324(3): 1234 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Zuideveld, P. H. Van der Graaf, D. Newgreen, R. Thurlow, N. Petty, P. Jordan, L. A. Peletier, and M. Danhof Mechanism-Based Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of 5-HT1A Receptor Agonists: Estimation of in Vivo Affinity and Intrinsic Efficacy on Body Temperature in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2004; 308(3): 1012 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. G. Visser, D. R. H. Huntjens, P. H. van der Graaf, L. A. Peletier, and M. Danhof Mechanism-Based Modeling of the Pharmacodynamic Interaction of Alphaxalone and Midazolam in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2003; 307(2): 765 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Zuideveld, J. Rusic-Pavletic, H. J. Maas, L. A. Peletier, P. H. Van der Graaf, and M. Danhof Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Buspirone and Its Metabolite 1-(2-Pyrimidinyl)-piperazine in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2002; 303(3): 1130 - 1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||