![]() |
|
|
Vol. 300, Issue 1, 265-272, January 2002
-Receptors
Geraldine Brush Cancer Research Institute, California Pacific
Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, California (P.R.,
Y.B., A.P.S., N.M.L.); and Semmelweis University School of Medicine,
Budapest, Hungary (S.F.)
When the opioid agonist morphine is given chronically and
systemically to mice by pellet implantation for 3 days, the animals develop substantial tolerance to the antinociceptive effect of a test
dose of morphine given systemically. When the test dose is administered
to the spinal cord, however, very little tolerance is observed. We
tested six strains of mice differing in the degree to which they
develop systemic tolerance to morphine and found that none of them
developed significant tolerance to spinal morphine. However, most of
these strains did develop substantial spinal tolerance to
antinociception induced by the selective µ-agonist [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin
(DAMGO) and by the selective
-agonist
[D-Pen2,D-Pen5]-enkephalin
(DPDPE). Moreover, in naïve animals, the antinociceptive effect
of both DAMGO and DPDPE was blocked by
D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2, a selective µ-antagonist, indicating that both agonists mediate antinociception in the spinal cord through µ-receptors. In addition to directly mediating antinociception, however, DPDPE potentiated the
antinociceptive activity of DAMGO in the spinal cord of naïve animals, and this antinociception was blocked by the
-antagonist H-TyrTicPsi[CH2NH]Phe-Thr-OH (TIPP
), indicating
mediation through
-receptors. In contrast, in tolerant animals,
TIPP
enhanced the antinociception of DAMGO. These results thus
demonstrate not only that µ- and
-opioid receptors interact in
naïve animals, but that the nature of this interaction changes
during tolerance, from a potentiation to an inhibition. The lack of
tolerance to spinal morphine may result from the ability of morphine to
act as a partial antagonist at
-receptors.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Rozenfeld and L. A. Devi Receptor heterodimerization leads to a switch in signaling: {beta}-arrestin2-mediated ERK activation by {micro}-{delta} opioid receptor heterodimers FASEB J, August 1, 2007; 21(10): 2455 - 2465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fan, G. Varghese, T. Nguyen, R. Tse, B. F. O'Dowd, and S. R. George A Role for the Distal Carboxyl Tails in Generating the Novel Pharmacology and G Protein Activation Profile of {micro} and {delta} Opioid Receptor Hetero-oligomers J. Biol. Chem., November 18, 2005; 280(46): 38478 - 38488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Roy, X. Guo, J. Kelschenbach, Y. Liu, and H. H. Loh In Vivo Activation of a Mutant {micro}-Opioid Receptor by Naltrexone Produces a Potent Analgesic Effect But No Tolerance: Role of {micro}-Receptor Activation and {delta}-Receptor Blockade in Morphine Tolerance J. Neurosci., March 23, 2005; 25(12): 3229 - 3233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Sterious and E. A. Walker Potency Differences for D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 as an Antagonist of Peptide and Alkaloid {micro}-Agonists in an Antinociception Assay J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2003; 304(1): 301 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||